10-K: Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405]
Published on March 2, 2026
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31 , 2025
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-40046
Core Scientific, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)
(512 ) 402-5233
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Warrants, each whole warrant exercisable for one share of common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share |
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller
reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller
reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
☒ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | Emerging growth company | ||
Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | Smaller reporting company |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for
complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of
the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b))
by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the
registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based
compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to § 240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
As of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the
common stock outstanding, other than shares held by persons who may be deemed affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference
to the closing sales price for the common stock on June 30, 2025 of $17.07, as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, was
approximately $4.25 billion.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes ☒ No ☐
As of February 26, 2026, 315,332,655 shares of common stock, par value $0.00001, were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
4
SUMMARY OF SELECTED RISK FACTORS
The following is a summary of the principal risks associated with an investment in our securities:
•Our success depends in large part on our ability to timely and successfully convert our existing facilities to support our high-
density colocation customers and to attract new high-density colocation customers. Delays in the expansion or modification
of existing facilities or the construction of new facilities or significant cost overruns could present significant risks to our
business and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
•Currently our high-density colocation business is highly dependent on a single customer.
•Our increased focus on high-density colocation services may not be successful and depends on the continuing development
and resource and computational requirements of high-density colocation applications such as cloud computing, machine
learning and artificial intelligence and continuing need for the infrastructure and services we provide.
•Our business is capital intensive, we will need to raise additional capital, and failure to obtain the necessary capital when
needed will force us to delay, limit or terminate our expansion efforts or other operations, which would have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
•We are subject to risks associated with our need for significant electric power and the limited availability of electrical power
and resources, equipment and materials designed to provide usable electrical power within our facilities. In addition, public
sentiment regarding electrical power generation, usage and storage, high volume electrical use and climate change, may limit
our access to electrical power, decrease available facility sites, and increase our costs and limit the demand for our high-
density colocation services. An inability to purchase and develop additional sources of low-cost sources of energy effectively
or to obtain real estate, materials and equipment to operate our facilities efficiently will have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
•Any failure in our critical systems, facilities or services we provide could lead to disruptions in our and our customers’
businesses and could harm our reputation and result in financial penalty and legal liabilities, which would reduce our revenue
and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
•We may be vulnerable to physical security breaches, which could disrupt our operations and have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our success is also dependent on our ability to mine bitcoin
profitably, and we will not be able to maintain our competitive position as the Bitcoin network experiences increases in total
network hash rate.
•A slowdown in market and economic conditions, particularly those impacting the cloud computing, machine learning and AI
industries, the demand for high-density colocation infrastructure and services, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
•We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, which has resulted in the
ineffectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. While we are working to remediate the identified material weakness,
we cannot assure you whether or when we will be successful in remediating the identified material weakness or that
additional material weaknesses will not be identified in the future. Failure to maintain an effective system of internal control
may result in material misstatements of our financial statements or cause us to fail to meet our periodic reporting obligations.
•The cash needs of our high-density colocation growth initiatives will limit the amount of digital assets we hold, thus
preventing us from recognizing any gain from the appreciation in value of the digital assets we have sold and may sell in the
future.
•Any change in the interpretive positions of the SEC or its staff with respect to digital asset mining firms could have a material
adverse effect on us.
•U.S. federal and state laws and regulations of digital assets and digital asset intermediaries, such as digital asset exchanges
and custodians, may increase our compliance costs and adversely impact the market for digital assets.
•Increasing scrutiny and changing expectations from government regulators, investors, lenders, customers, and other market
participants with respect to Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) policies may impose additional costs on us or
expose us to additional risks.
•Digital assets, and bitcoin in particular, are subject to price volatility. The value of bitcoin is dependent on a number of
factors, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
5
•The “halving” of rewards available on the Bitcoin network, or the reduction of rewards on other networks, has had and in the
future could have a negative impact on our ability to generate revenue which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
•If the bitcoin rewards and/or transaction fees for solving blocks on other networks is not sufficiently high to incentivize
miners or validators, such miners or validators may reduce or cease expending processing power on a particular network,
which could negatively impact the utility of the network, reduce the value of its native digital assets and have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
•Our compliance and risk management methods might not be effective and may result in outcomes that could adversely affect
our reputation, operating results, and financial condition.
•We may not have adequate sources of recovery if the bitcoin or other digital assets held by us are lost, stolen or destroyed due
to third-party digital asset services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
6
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including, without limitation, statements under Item 1. — “Business” and Item 7. —
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” includes forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of words such as
“ability,” “aim,” “assume,” “estimate,” “plan,” “possible,” “project,” “forecast,” “goal,” “opportunity,” “intend,” “will,” “expect,”
“anticipate,” “believe,” “enable,” “seek,” “target” or other similar expressions that predict or indicate future events or trends or that are
not statements of historical matters. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding projections,
estimates and forecasts of revenue and other financial and performance metrics, projections of market opportunity and expectations,
the Company’s ability to scale and grow its business, successfully complete construction of its data centers, and source sufficient
electrical energy, necessary long lead infrastructure components, supplies and equipment, the advantages and expected growth of the
Company and the Company’s ability to source and retain talent. These statements are provided for illustrative purposes only and are
based on various assumptions, whether or not identified in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and on the current expectations of the
Company’s management. These forward-looking statements are not intended to serve, and must not be relied on by any investor, as a
guarantee, an assurance, a prediction or a definitive statement of fact or probability. Actual events and circumstances are difficult or
impossible to predict and will differ from assumptions. Many actual events and circumstances are beyond the control of the Company.
These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and
assumptions, known or unknown, that could cause actual results to vary materially from those indicated or anticipated. These risks,
assumptions and uncertainties include those described in Item 1A. — “Risk Factors.” If one or more of these risks or uncertainties
materializes, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those indicated or anticipated by
such forward-looking statements. There may be additional risks that the Company could not presently know or that the Company
currently believes are immaterial that could also cause actual results to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements.
In addition, forward-looking statements reflect the Company’s expectations, plans or forecasts of future events and views as of the
date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should not be relied upon as representing the Company’s assessments as of any date
subsequent to the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company anticipates that subsequent events and developments will
cause the Company’s assessments to change. However, while the Company may elect to update these forward-looking statements at
some point in the future, the Company specifically disclaims any obligation to do so. Accordingly, you should not place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made.
7
Part I
Item 1. Business
Overview
Core Scientific, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” “Core Scientific,” or “Core”) designs, builds and operates large-scale,
purpose-built data centers that support high-density colocation services and digital asset mining for both our own account and to a
lesser extent, third-party customers. Our data centers are optimized for power-intensive, mission-critical computing workloads, with a
focus on artificial intelligence (“AI”) and other high-performance computing (“HPC”) applications.
As of December 31, 2025, we owned or leased ten data centers across seven U.S. states, representing approximately 1.4
gigawatts (“GW”) of gross utility power capacity, or approximately 920 megawatts (“MW”) of total leasable customer power
capacity. A portion of these facilities were in operation as of December 31, 2025, with the remainder under construction or in various
stages of development.
Since its inception in 2017, Core Scientific has been focused on building and operating high-power, purpose-built data centers,
initially for digital asset mining and hosting third-party digital asset mining customers. The Company historically targeted sites with
abundant, reliable and cost-effective power, strong network connectivity, available land or existing buildings suitable for
redevelopment, attractive economic incentives, and access to utilities. In developing its facilities, the Company typically designed
powered shells and sufficient fiber connectivity to high performance data center standards, enabling flexibility to support increasing
power densities and evolving compute requirements over time.
In 2024, the Company announced its strategy to focus its data center infrastructure and expertise to the high-density colocation
compute business and in February 2024, entered into long-term contract with CoreWeave, Inc. (“CoreWeave”) to deliver 16 MW of
infrastructure at our Austin, Texas facility. In June 2024, Core Scientific announced that it had entered another contract with
CoreWeave for 200 MW of leased customer power capacity. Through the exercise of several contractual options during 2024 and into
early 2025, total leased customer power capacity under the relationship with CoreWeave increased to approximately 590 MW of
leased power capacity.
In 2025, we derived the majority of our revenue from earning digital assets for our own account but expect that a meaningful
amount of our revenue will be derived from high-density colocation (“HDC”) in 2026, as billable customer power capacity gets
delivered to our end customer. We intend to convert every megawatt in our portfolio to high-density colocation infrastructure over the
next three years, while continuing to digital asset mine during conversion only to meet existing power commitments at facilities where
HDC conversion is taking place or to honor a small number of digital asset mining hosting commitments. We are also actively
evaluating opportunities to acquire new sites, including land and power capacity, to expand our data center footprint beyond our
current portfolio.
Industry Background
We participate in the third-party colocation market, providing customers with access to purpose-built data center environments
that deliver secure physical space, reliable electrical power, cooling systems and facility operations required to support IT and
networking equipment. Customers deploy and manage their own hardware, while the operator designs, builds and operates the
underlying infrastructure needed to maintain uptime, power availability and cooling requirements. Customers often utilize third-party
colocation services as part of a broader infrastructure strategy to accelerate deployment timelines, expand into additional
geographic markets or optimize capital allocation, while retaining control over their hardware, software and data.
Within the third-party colocation market, providers offer wholesale, retail or hybrid colocation services, which differ primarily
based on contract size, deployment scale and customer profile. Our operations are primarily focused on wholesale colocation, which
typically involves large, long-term agreements with a limited number of customers, often with initial terms of 10 years or more for
dedicated suites, halls or entire buildings, with leased customer power capacity that can range from several megawatts to tens or
hundreds of megawatts per customer. Wholesale customers are commonly hyperscale cloud providers, AI and other HPC operators
and large enterprises with the operational capability to manage hardware and networking at scale.
Wholesale colocation agreements are commonly structured as either triple-net or modified gross leases, which differ in how
operating costs are allocated between the operator and the customer. Under a triple-net structure, the customer is generally responsible
for substantially all operating expenses associated with the leased space, including power, maintenance, taxes, insurance and other
facility-related costs. Modified gross leases, by contrast, typically involve the operator retaining responsibility for certain facility-level
operating expenses, while the customer is billed separately for power and, in some cases, other variable operating costs. Both lease
8
structures are frequently paired with long-term, take-or-pay contractual commitments, under which the customer is obligated to pay for
leased customer power capacity regardless of utilization, providing operators with revenue visibility over the contract term.
The colocation industry has evolved significantly in recent years, driven in particular by the large-scale deployment of
infrastructure to support AI and other HPC workloads. We expect demand for AI-focused compute resources to continue to grow
significantly as generative AI adoption accelerates and AI use cases expand across industries. These compute-intensive environments
require substantially higher rack power densities, specialized cooling technologies and access to large-scale, power capacity. As these
requirements continue to increase, demand is shifting toward operators capable of supporting high-density, accelerator-driven
workloads and delivering the associated power and cooling infrastructure at scale, trends that are expected to continue shaping the
industry.
Key Industry Trends
Significant increase in power density and infrastructure requirements driven by AI and HPC.
The rapid expansion of AI and other HPC workloads is driving materially higher infrastructure requirements across the
colocation industry. Traditional enterprise and cloud deployments have historically operated at rack power densities of approximately
5 to 15 kilowatts per rack, whereas AI and HPC workloads increasingly require 50 kilowatts per rack or more, with deployments
increasingly exceeding 100 kilowatts per rack. Supporting these higher-density environments requires substantially greater electrical
capacity, advanced cooling technologies and access to large, contiguous blocks of power, and introduces additional complexity in
facility design and construction. As a result, traditional data center designs optimized for air-cooled environments are often insufficient
for these workloads, and new developments increasingly incorporate liquid-cooled or hybrid cooling architectures.
These shifts place greater importance on operators with the technical, engineering and construction experience required to
design, build and operate high-density data center infrastructure at scale. For many years, our digital asset mining operations
have required the design, construction and operation of infrastructure capable of supporting high power density workloads, including
large-scale electrical deployments, specialized cooling systems and complex facility operations. These operations have involved
managing significant power loads, coordinating with utilities, and maintaining continuous operations across geographically distributed
facilities. We believe this experience provides relevant technical and operational expertise as we repurpose existing facilities and
develop new infrastructure to support AI-related workloads and high-density colocation services.
Evolving utility requirements and commercial terms.
In response to the significant increase in power demand driven by the continued proliferation of AI infrastructure, a
growing number of electric utility providers have adjusted their commercial and operational requirements, particularly in markets with
limited availability of incremental power capacity, where the pace of new generation and grid infrastructure development has not kept
up with demand from large-scale data center projects. As a result, utilities have implemented more structured and disciplined
commercial frameworks designed to better align power reservations with demonstrated project execution and load growth. These
measures increasingly include the requirement for significant collateral postings at contract execution, minimum monthly demand
commitments and other financial assurances as conditions to reserving and delivering large amounts of power capacity.
Utilities may also impose requirements related to phased load ramping, minimum utilization thresholds, capacity reservation
charges or demand-based metrics, including kilovolt-amperes-based or similar measures. In some cases, these practices are intended to
discourage speculative capacity reservations or “power banking” and to prioritize projects that demonstrate near-term readiness and
execution certainty. These evolving utility requirements can increase upfront costs, extend pre-construction timelines and add
complexity to power procurement, project planning and contracting for colocation providers and their customers, particularly in
markets with limited available capacity or constrained grid infrastructure.
Supply chain sourcing and availability of skilled labor play a key role in delivery timelines.
The development of large-scale data center infrastructure to support AI and other high-performance computing workloads is a
lengthy and complex process, with conventional large data centers typically requiring 18 to 24 months, or longer, from site selection
and permitting through construction and energization, excluding grid interconnection timelines. These timelines reflect the significant
upfront design and engineering work required to coordinate electrical, mechanical and cooling systems, as well as the scale of
construction and commissioning activities necessary to deliver power-intensive colocation infrastructure.
9
We believe the procurement of long-lead-time electrical and mechanical equipment has become among the most significant
factors affecting delivery timelines for large-scale AI infrastructure deployments. Certain components, including high-voltage
transformers, switchgear, generators and advanced cooling systems, can require lead times of 12 to 18 months or longer, which can
materially affect data center construction schedules. In addition, demand for experienced data center contractors and specialized
subcontractors, including licensed electricians, engineers and commissioning professionals, has increased significantly across the
industry in recent years. As a result, while the ability to secure large amounts of power capacity is often viewed as a primary
bottleneck, we believe extended equipment lead times and skilled labor availability are likely to play an increasingly important
role in determining data center construction timelines over the coming years.
Data Center Portfolio
As of December 31, 2025, we owned or leased ten data centers in Alabama (1), Georgia (2), Kentucky (1), North Carolina (1),
North Dakota (1), Oklahoma (1), and Texas (3) totaling 920 MW of total leasable customer power capacity, or 1.4 GW on a gross
utility power capacity basis.
Business Operations and Segments
We have three operating segments: “Colocation,” consisting of providing high-density colocation services to third parties for
AI / HPC operations, “Digital Asset Self-Mining,” consisting of performing digital asset mining for our own account, and “Digital
Asset Hosted Mining,” consisting of providing hosting services to third parties for digital asset mining. Prior to April 1, 2024, we
operated primarily in the Digital Asset Self-Mining and Digital Asset Hosted Mining segments. During fiscal year 2024, our
“Colocation” segment was referred to as “HPC Hosting.”
We derived the majority of our 2025 revenue from earning digital assets for our own account but expect to rapidly increase
revenue derived from high-density colocation (“HDC”) as capacity gets delivered to our existing and future end customers. We intend
to convert every megawatt in our portfolio to HDC infrastructure over the next three years. Our Colocation segment provides space,
power, cooling, facilities operations, security and other services to third-party customers to support workloads for machine learning
and artificial intelligence. Under these contracts, customers pay fixed payments (based on electric capacity) and variable payments on
a recurring basis. HDC colocation leases may include all or portions of a data center, where customers may also lease office space to
support their colocation operations where revenue is primarily based on power usage as well as square footage.
Our Digital Asset Self-Mining segment generates revenue from the deployment and operation of our own large fleet of
specialized computers, or “miners” within our owned digital infrastructure as part of a pool of users that solve complex cryptographic
algorithms to validate transactions conducted on one or more blockchain networks. In the Bitcoin network, solving a block results in a
reward of bitcoin in a process known as “mining.” These rewards of bitcoin currently can be sold profitably when the sale price of
bitcoin exceeds the cost of mining, which generally consists of the cost of mining hardware, the cost of the electrical power to operate
the machine, and other facility and overhead costs associated with housing, operating and supporting the equipment.
Our Digital Asset Hosted Mining segment generates revenue through the sale of electricity-based consumption contracts for our
hosting services, which are recurring in nature. Our Digital Asset Hosted Mining operation segment provides a full suite of services to
our digital asset mining customers. We provide deployment, monitoring, troubleshooting, optimization and maintenance of our
customers’ digital asset mining equipment and provide necessary electrical power, repair and other infrastructure services necessary
for our customers to operate, maintain and efficiently mine digital assets. We do not expect to further expand our Digital Asset Hosted
Mining operations in 2026 and future years and may not derive consequential digital asset hosting revenue in future periods.
Suppliers
Power Providers
We have fixed, variable and interruptible bi-lateral power supply consumption agreements with electric power suppliers at our
various facilities. These agreements provide for both firm and interruptible power supply through each provider’s transmission and
distribution systems to dedicated substations owned by the power provider, the local utility or the Company. We value our
relationships with our power providers and work to leverage our operating capabilities to take advantage of any interruptible programs
and cost saving opportunities.
10
The table below summarizes the gross utility power capacity in MW by facility location and electric utility provider as of
December 31, 2025:
Electric Utility Providers | Gross Utility Power Capacity (MW) | Facility Location | ||
Tennessee Valley Authority | 150 | Paducah-Calvert City, Kentucky | ||
Murphy Electric Power Board | 35 | Marble, North Carolina | ||
Duke Energy | 82 | Marble, North Carolina | ||
Dalton Utilities | 195 | Dalton, Georgia | ||
Nodak Electric Cooperative, Inc. | 100 | Grand Forks, North Dakota | ||
Denton Municipal Electric | 394 | Dallas-Denton, Texas | ||
Texas New-Mexico Power | 300 | Pecos, Texas | ||
Oklahoma Gas & Electric | 100 | Muskogee, Oklahoma | ||
Austin Energy | 20 | Austin, Texas | ||
Alabama Power Company | 50 | Auburn, Alabama | ||
Total | 1,426 |
Facility Development
Our experienced in-house facility development teams, utilizing from time to time the expertise of third parties, focus on
sourcing, evaluating, designing, engineering, and developing the facilities where we host our customers’ HPC colocation needs and
facilities where we earn digital assets, primarily bitcoin, through self-mining. We primarily engage third-party contractors to construct
our facilities according to our design specifications.
Mining Equipment
Our mining operations rely on specialized digital asset mining hardware equipped with ASIC chips ("ASICs") designed to solve
cryptographic hashes for blockchain networks using the SHA-256 algorithm. Historically, we have sourced substantially all of our
miners from Bitmain Technologies Limited (“Bitmain”), one of the leading manufacturers of digital asset mining equipment. In 2024
we entered into an agreement with Block, Inc. a technology company developing ASICs, to acquire 3 nm ASICs customized for
digital asset mining.
As of December 31, 2025, we deployed approximately 151,400 bitcoin miners, which number consists of approximately
135,500 self-miners and approximately 15,900 hosted miners, which represented 15.7 exahash per second (“EH/s”) and 2.2 EH/s for
self-miners and hosted miners, respectively. As of December 31, 2024, we deployed approximately 171,100 bitcoin miners, which
number consists of approximately 164,000 self-miners and approximately 7,100 hosted miners, which represented 19.1 EH/s and 1.0
EH/s for self-miners and hosted miners, respectively.
Competition
Each of the HDC and bitcoin mining markets are highly competitive.
In the HDC market, we compete with numerous established data center providers, including both public and private companies
such as:
•Aligned Data Centers;
•Compass Datacenters;
•Equinix, Inc.;
•Digital Realty Trust;
•NTT;
•QTS;
11
•Switch, Inc.;
•Vantage Data Centers; and
•CyrusOne Inc.
Many of these competitors are more established, have better brand recognition, are well capitalized, and are organized to take
advantage of certain tax benefits for their investors, lowering their external cost of capital. Many of our competitors seek to establish
data centers in the same geographic regions as we do and compete for the same sources of power, equipment and customers as Core
Scientific. Competitors compete on price, facility location, reputation and perceived skill with respect to performance. We believe that
our experienced data center and engineering leadership team, our proven ability to rapidly deliver scalable, purpose-built data centers,
combined with cutting-edge, energy-efficient technologies, will enable us to compete favorably within the HDC market.
Additionally, we compete with other digital asset miners who have signed contracts with AI / HPC customers to convert
existing digital mining facilities into HDC facilities including:
•Applied Digital Corporation;
•Cipher Mining Inc.;
•Galaxy Digital;
•Hut 8 Corp.;
•IREN; and
•Terawulf, Inc.
Our digital asset self-mining operations compete globally with other mining operations throughout the world to complete new
blocks on the blockchain and earn the reward in the form of bitcoin. We compete on the basis of our total number of miners, the hash
rate we are able to consistently generate, the size and skill of the mining pool through which we participate and the efficiency of our
miner and mining operations. Our mining operations also compete with non-digital asset operations for access to suitable real estate
and access to affordable and dependable electric power.
Our hosting activities compete with a large number of other hosting operations. Our success in our hosting operations depends
on our ability to supply hosting space and power, our performance with respect to installation, operation and repair of customer
equipment, our ability to obtain replacement parts, the value of our service offering to our customers and the availability of mining
equipment.
In both our self-mining and hosting activities, we additionally compete with other operations and participants for equity and
debt financing since our business is capital intensive.
Several public companies (traded in the United States, Canada, and internationally), such as the following, may be considered
self-mining and hosting competitors to the Company:
•Applied Digital Corporation
•Bit Digital, Inc.;
•Bitfarms Ltd.;
•Cipher Mining Inc.; and
•CleanSpark, Inc.
Human Resources
As of December 31, 2025, we had 325 full-time employees. All of our employees are located in the United States in 26 states.
We may also engage consultants and contractors from time to time to supplement our regular full-time workforce on an as needed
12
basis. None of our employees are represented by a labor union or covered by collective bargaining agreements, and we have not
experienced any work stoppages.
Our mission and values are the foundation for our Company culture. More specifically, our mission is to accelerate digital
innovation by scaling high-density computing rapidly, efficiently, and responsibly. As for our values, they include: (1) operating with
integrity and maintaining the highest standards, and supporting each other as a single team, to ensure our collective success (“Team
First”); (2) acting as owners of the business, in the interest of all stakeholders, holding ourselves and each other accountable for our
actions and outcomes (“Extreme Ownership”); (3) relentlessly seeking to accelerate the world’s digital transformation and improve the
way we do business to reduce costs, improve quality and grow (“Innovate & Simplify”); and (4) seeking to maximize transparency
with all our stakeholders to ensure understanding, alignment and constructive dialog (“Transparency”). Our mission and values reflect
who we are and the way our employees interact with one another, our customers, partners, and shareholders. Working together and
guided by our mission and values, we are committed to creating a company where employees have the opportunity to advance their
careers and make a difference in our business performance.
Core Scientific works diligently to attract and retain the best available talent in both the data center space as well as functional
experts from a wide range of industries and sectors. We offer competitive base compensation, performance-based annual incentives,
equity at certain levels and benefits offerings to create a compelling employment proposition. Along with our performance focused
culture and team first mentality, Core Scientific has created a best in class destination for talented employees.
Intellectual Property
We seek protection for our intellectual property as appropriate. To establish and protect our proprietary rights, we rely upon a
combination of patent, copyright, trade secret and trademark laws and contractual restrictions such as confidentiality agreements,
licenses and intellectual property assignment agreements.
We have filed over 130 patent applications in technologies such as blockchain, data center management, infrastructure and
cooling. The patent applications have been filed in the United States and in certain locations outside the United States. A subset of the
patent applications have issued as patents. We maintain a policy requiring our employees, contractors, consultants and other third
parties to enter into confidentiality and proprietary rights agreements to control access to our proprietary information. These laws,
procedures and restrictions provide only limited protection, and any of our intellectual property rights may be challenged, invalidated,
circumvented, infringed or misappropriated. Furthermore, the laws of certain countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same
extent as the laws of the United States, and we therefore may be unable to protect our proprietary technology in certain jurisdictions.
Moreover, our platform incorporates software components licensed to the general public under open-source software licenses. We
obtain many components from software developed and released by contributors to independent open-source components of our
platform. Open-source licenses grant licensees broad permissions to use, copy, modify and redistribute those open-source components
of our platform. As a result, open-source development and licensing practices can limit the value of our software copyright assets.
We pursue the registration of our domain names, trademarks and service marks in the United States and in certain locations
outside the United States. To protect our brand, we file trademark registrations in some jurisdictions.
Government Regulation
Government regulation of large-scale data center operations continues to evolve in the United States. Multiple federal and state
regulators have expressed interest in oversight of data center infrastructure, AI and other HPC applications, and the energy-intensive
computing activities associated with large-scale data center operations.
Federal agencies have increased scrutiny of energy use by large-scale data center operators. Future regulatory action related to
the energy usage of data center operations, including possible reporting or operational requirements, could affect our colocation
activities.
In July 2025, the President signed an executive order titled “Accelerating Federal Permitting of Data Center Infrastructure,”
which directs federal agencies to streamline permitting and environmental review for large-scale AI data center projects requiring
more than 100 megawatts of new electrical load. The executive order also directs the Departments of the Interior, Energy, and Defense
to authorize data center construction on appropriate federal lands, and instructs the Secretary of Commerce to launch an initiative to
provide financial support for qualifying projects. While this executive order may benefit our colocation operations by reducing
permitting timelines for future expansion, the scope and durability of these measures remain uncertain and subject to change.
13
State level regulation of large-scale data center operations is also developing. In June 2025, Texas enacted Senate Bill 6, which
introduces significant new requirements for large-load electricity customers, including data centers within the Electric Reliability
Council of Texas (“ERCOT”) region. SB 6 applies to customers with loads exceeding 75 megawatts at a single site and requires such
customers to contribute to transmission interconnection costs, disclose duplicative interconnection requests, and maintain backup
generation or load curtailment capability during grid emergencies. Facilities interconnecting after December 31, 2025 must install
remote-disconnect equipment to enable ERCOT-directed load shedding during grid stress events. The Public Utility Commission of
Texas is required to review and potentially revise the methodology for allocating wholesale transmission charges to large-load
customers by December 31, 2026.
Oklahoma’s HB 3594, effective November 2024, requires that any regulations imposed on digital asset mining businesses also
apply to traditional data centers and prohibits discriminatory electricity rates for such operations. This legislation supports our facility
under development for colocation services in Muskogee, Oklahoma.
Kentucky’s expanded data center incentive program, enacted through House Bill 775 in 2025, broadened eligibility for sales
and use tax exemptions on qualified data center equipment statewide based on county population thresholds.
In Georgia, the Public Service Commission adopted a rule in January 2025 allowing Georgia Power to impose minimum billing
requirements, longer contract terms, and site-specific cost allocations on new large-load customers exceeding 100 megawatts,
including data centers. In December 2025, the Georgia PSC approved approximately 9,885 megawatts of new generation capacity,
driven largely by projected data center demand, with conditions requiring large-load customers to bear a significant share of associated
infrastructure costs.
In other locations where we operate, including North Carolina, North Dakota, and Alabama, no state statute presently restricts
data center operations, although state commissions and local zoning authorities continue to evaluate rules applicable to large electricity
load facilities and data centers. These state level developments may increase our compliance obligations, affect economic terms for
power, or restrict siting or loading of our colocation operations.
Regulatory frameworks include environmental requirements, zoning and land use considerations, cybersecurity expectations,
and requirements related to data privacy. These obligations may increase over time as governments respond to growth in data center
activity and increasing demand for power.
The effect of future regulatory changes at the federal or state level is difficult to predict. Any such changes could materially
affect our operations, energy costs, customer demand, or the profitability of colocation activities.
Environmental
The effects of human activity on global climate change have attracted considerable public and scientific attention, as well as the
attention of the United States and other foreign governments. In general, efforts are being made by government regulators and others
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, particularly those from coal combustion power plants. Some of these plants may be those our
operations rely upon for power. In addition, there are increasing concerns over the quantity of energy, particularly from non-renewable
sources, used for bitcoin mining and its effects on the environment (with lesser recognition for any positive contributions by bitcoin
mining to the operation of existing electrical grids and systems).
While the nature or effect on the Company of any environmental regulatory changes by federal, state, local or foreign
governments or self-regulatory agencies is impossible to predict, the added cost of any environmental taxes, charges, assessments or
penalties levied on power plants we rely upon could be passed on to us, increasing the cost to run our facilities. If environmental laws
or regulations or industry standards are either changed or adopted and impose significant operational restrictions and compliance
requirements on our operations, our business, capital expenditures, results of operations, financial condition and competitive position
could be materially adversely impacted.
Seasonality
The Company’s colocation operations can be affected when extreme temperatures in locations where its data centers operate
result in local power price volatility that necessitates economic or grid stabilization-driven curtailment. Our data centers are equipped
with backup generators designed to support critical facility infrastructure in the event of a power outage or curtailment.
14
Peak demand periods, which typically occur during summer and winter months, may result in elevated power prices or grid
constraints that affect the availability or cost of power at our data centers.
Grid operators may direct mandatory curtailment of large-load customers during grid emergency events. In certain jurisdictions
where we operate, including Texas, regulatory frameworks require large-load facilities to comply with mandatory load reduction or
remote disconnection instructions issued by the grid operator during periods of extreme grid stress. We would comply with any such
mandatory curtailment directives and utilize backup generators designed to support critical facility infrastructure. With respect to our
colocation operations, mandatory curtailment events directed by a grid operator are force majeure events under our customer
agreements.
Corporate Information
Our principal executive offices are located at 838 Walker Road, Suite 21-2105, Dover, Delaware 19904, and our telephone
number is (512) 402-5233. Our corporate website address is www.corescientific.com. Information contained on or accessible through
our website is not a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the inclusion of our website address in this Annual Report on Form
10-K is an inactive textual reference.
Available Information
We currently make our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, proxy
reports and all amendments to those reports available free of charge on our website at www.corescientific.com as soon as reasonably
practicable after we file such reports with, or furnish such reports to, the SEC. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports,
proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov. The
information contained on the websites referenced in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is not incorporated by reference into this filing,
and references to such website addresses are intended to be inactive textual references only.
15
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described
below together with all of the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our financial statements and
related notes elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” before deciding to invest in our securities. Although we have organized risks
generally according to these categories in the discussion below, many of the risks may have ramifications in more than one
category. These categories, therefore, should be viewed as a starting point for understanding the significant risks we face and not as a
limitation on the potential impact of the matters discussed. If any of the events or developments described below were to occur, our
business, prospects, operating results and financial condition could suffer materially, the trading price of our securities could decline,
and you could lose all or part of your investment. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face.
Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or that we currently believe to be immaterial, may also adversely affect
our business.
Risks Related to our Businesses and Industries
Our success depends in large part on our ability to timely and successfully convert our existing facilities to support our high-
density colocation customers and to attract new high-density colocation customers. Delays in the expansion or modification of
existing facilities or the construction of new facilities or significant cost overruns could present significant risks to our business
and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In 2024, we initiated a significant strategic transition in our operations from bitcoin mining to colocation services, which will
require the conversion of our existing infrastructure or development of new facilities to support our high-density colocation customers.
Our ability to timely and successfully convert our existing facilities or construct new facilities to support our high-density colocation
customers may be negatively impacted by:
•deficiencies, delays or failures in performance by construction firms retained to build, build-out or remodel our facilities;
•disruptions in the supply chain or excessive demand for construction materials, electrical transformers, generators and other
materials used in high performance data centers that delay receipt of, or make unavailable, required supplies, materials and
equipment;
•difficulties in generating sufficient cash flow or obtaining necessary financing that delay or prevent the completion of
planned facilities;
•failure on the part of our customers to timely pay or reimburse construction costs and expenses when due; or failure on our
part to timely pay construction costs and expenses;
•delays in obtaining necessary government approvals, receipt of power allocations, land acquisitions and easements, as well as
change orders, modification to designs and construction plans that delay construction, increase costs or that reduce the usable
electrical power footprint;
•customer-initiated changes in project design, specification, scope, or delivery sequencing; or
•severe weather events, natural disasters, or other force majeure conditions, including hurricanes, tornadoes, winter storms,
extreme heat, or flooding, that disrupt construction timelines, damage facilities or equipment, or limit the availability of
construction labor or materials.
Any failure to timely or successfully convert our existing facilities or construct new facilities to support our high-density
colocation customers could result in reputational damage and harm our ability to retain existing customers or attract new customers to
our business, any of which could impact our future growth and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Currently our high-density colocation business is highly dependent on a single customer.
One customer, CoreWeave, currently accounts for 100% of our Colocation segment revenue. Our success in the Colocation
segment is highly dependent on the success of CoreWeave and the fulfillment by it of its obligations under our existing contractual
arrangements. Any failure to meet CoreWeave’s expectations, including, but not limited to, failure to fulfill our contractual
obligations, could result in cancellation or non-renewal of our business relationship, or harm to our business relationship that could
impact our future growth and which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
16
Our increased focus on high-density colocation may not be successful and depends on the continuing development and
resource and computational requirements of high-density colocation applications such as cloud computing, machine learning and
artificial intelligence and continuing need for the infrastructure and services we provide.
Our success also depends in large part on our ability to attract additional customers and retain our existing customer for our
high-density colocation capabilities in a profitable manner, which we may not be able to do if:
•there is a reduction in the demand for high-density colocation applications such as cloud computing, machine learning and
artificial intelligence;
•rapid innovation and technological disruption in cloud computing, machine learning and artificial intelligence decrease
computational requirements and therefore lower demand for our high-density colocation offerings;
•high energy costs, supply chain disruptions (including labor availability), government regulation, and compliance costs
increase high-density colocation service costs, reduces potential demand for services and reduce revenue and profitability;
•we fail to provide competitive hosting terms or effectively market them to potential customers;
•we provide hosting services that are deemed by existing and potential customers or suppliers to be inferior to those of our
competitors, or that fail to meet customers’ or suppliers’ ongoing and evolving program qualification standards, based on a
range of factors, including available power, preferred design features, security considerations and connectivity;
•businesses decide to host internally as an alternative to the use of our services;
•we fail to successfully communicate the benefits of our services to potential customers;
•we are unable to strengthen awareness of our brand; or
•we are unable to provide services that our existing and potential customers desire.
If our target customer markets, which are new and still developing, do not grow or develop as expected or in a manner
consistent with our current business model, our business, financial condition and results of operation would be adversely affected.
Further, increases in power costs could negatively impact our hosting customers’ demand for services, harm our growth prospects and
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success in our digital asset segments depends in large part on our ability to mine bitcoin in a profitable manner which
we may not be able to do if:
•there is a reduction in the demand for bitcoin causing the price of bitcoin to fall reducing revenue from our self-mining
operations;
•high energy costs, supply chain disruptions or government regulation compliance costs increase mining costs and reduce
revenue and profitability; or
•we do not secure or are unable to secure an adequate supply of new generation digital asset mining equipment.
In the past, increases in power costs have impacted our ability to earn digital assets efficiently and a reduction in bitcoin’s
market price has reduced our operating margins. Future increases in power costs and unfavorable prices for digital assets will harm our
growth prospects and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to maintain our competitive position as the Bitcoin network experiences increases in total network hash
rate.
As the relative market prices of a digital asset, such as bitcoin, increases, more companies are encouraged to mine for that
digital asset and as more miners are added to the network, its total hash rate increases. In order for us to maintain our competitive
position under such circumstances, we must increase our total hash rate by acquiring and deploying more mining machines, including
new miners with higher hash rates. There are currently only a few companies capable of producing a sufficient number of machines
with adequate quality to address the increased demand. If we are not able to acquire and deploy additional miners on a timely basis,
our proportion of the overall network hash rate will decrease and we will have a lower chance of solving new blocks and earning the
related mining rewards, which will have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
17
As more processing power is added to a network, our relative percentage of total processing power on that network is
expected to decline absent significant capital investment, which has an adverse impact on our ability to generate revenue from
processing transactions on that network and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Processing power on networks has been increasing rapidly over time, while the rewards and transaction fees available on those
networks tends to decline over time. In order to grow or maintain the revenue we generate from processing transactions on such
networks, we are required to invest significant capital to acquire new computer servers, expand our power capacity and otherwise
increase our effective processing power on such networks. In the event we are unable to invest sufficient capital to grow or maintain
the level of our processing power on a network relative to the total processing power of such network, our revenue from the applicable
network will decline over time and as a result, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
In addition, a decrease in the price of computer servers may result in an increase in transaction processors, which may lead to
more competition for fees in a particular network. In the event we are unable to realize adequate fees on a network due to increased
competition, our revenue from the applicable network will decline over time and in turn, it could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business is capital intensive, and failure to obtain the necessary capital when needed will force us to delay, limit or
terminate our expansion efforts or other operations, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
The costs of constructing, developing, operating and maintaining our high-density colocation and digital mining facilities, and
owning and operating a large fleet of the latest generation digital mining equipment, are substantial.
Our high-density colocation operations may be impacted by costs and expenses beyond our control or require capital
investment that neither we nor our customers are able to bear, reducing our revenue and profitability.
Our digital asset mining operation can only be successful and ultimately profitable if the costs, including hardware and
electricity costs, associated with earning digital assets are lower than the price of the digital assets we earn. Falling digital asset prices
or asset prices that do not keep pace with higher energy prices, significantly higher energy prices, inflation and supply chain
disruptions reduce our profitability. Our miners experience ordinary wear and tear from operation and may also face more significant
malfunctions caused by factors which may be beyond our control, increasing our costs and reducing our revenue and profitability. The
continual upgrade and refresh of mining machines requires substantial capital investment, and we may face challenges in doing so on a
timely basis based on availability of new miners and our access to adequate capital resources. If we are unable to obtain adequate
numbers of new and replacement miners at scale, we may be unable to remain competitive in our highly competitive and evolving
industry.
We may need to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings in order to meet our operating and capital needs.
Raising additional debt or equity financing may be difficult and may not be available when needed or, if available, may not be
available on satisfactory terms. An inability to generate sufficient cash from operations or to obtain additional debt or equity financing
have adversely affected our results of operations.
If we do not accurately predict our facility requirements, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
The costs of building out, leasing and maintaining our facilities constitute a significant portion of our capital and operating
expenses. In order to manage growth and ensure adequate capacity for our new and existing high-density colocation customers while
minimizing unnecessary excess capacity costs, we continuously evaluate our short- and long-term data center capacity requirements. If
we overestimate our business’ capacity requirements or the demand for our services and therefore secure excess data center capacity,
our operating margins could be materially reduced. If we underestimate our data center capacity requirements, we may not be able to
service the required or expanding needs of our existing customers and may be required to limit new customer acquisition, which could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to risks associated with our need for significant electric power and the limited availability of electrical power
and resources, equipment and materials designed to provide usable electrical power within our facilities, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. An inability to purchase and develop
18
additional sources of low-cost sources of energy effectively or to obtain real estate, materials and equipment to operate our
facilities efficiently will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We require a significant electric power supply to conduct our mining activity and to provide many hosting services we offer,
such as powering and cooling our and our customers’ servers and network equipment and operating critical mining and facility and
equipment infrastructure. The costs of electric power therefore account for a significant portion of our cost of revenue.
The amount of power required by us and our customers will increase commensurate with the demand for our services and the
increase in miners we operate for ourselves and our hosting customers. Energy costs and availability are vulnerable to seasonality,
with increased costs primarily in the summer months and risks of outages and power grid damage as a result of inclement weather,
animal incursion, sabotage and other events out of our control. For example, higher than expected power rates in 2022 materially and
adversely impacted our operations.
We aim to build and operate energy efficient facilities, but such facilities may not be able to deliver sufficient power to meet the
growing needs of our business. The cost of power at our facilities is dependent on our ability to perform under the terms in the power
contracts we are a party to, which we may be unable to do successfully. Pursuant to power contracts that require curtailment, if we fail
to curtail our power usage when called upon or fail to satisfy certain eligibility requirements for monthly bill credits, our power costs
would increase. Further, governments and government regulators may potentially seek to restrict or prohibit the ability of electricity
suppliers to provide electricity to our facilities in times of electricity shortage or otherwise. To that end, public sentiment regarding
electrical power generation, usage and storage, high volume electrical use and climate change may limit our access to electrical power,
decrease available facility sites, and increase our costs and limit the demand for our high-density colocation services. Any system
downtime resulting from disruptions, curtailments, insufficient power resources or power outages could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our high-density colocation operations run on back-up generators in the
event of a power outage or curtailment that may not be sufficient to support our operations for the magnitude or duration of the power
outage or curtailment. Increased power costs and limited availability and curtailment of power resources will reduce our revenue and
have a material and adverse effect on our cost of revenue and results of operations.
If we fail to accurately estimate the factors upon which we base our contract pricing, we may generate less profit than
expected or incur losses on those contracts, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Our hosting contracts are generally priced on the basis of estimated power consumption by our clients and the other costs of
providing electrical power and other services. Our ability to earn a profit on such contracts requires that we accurately estimate the
costs involved and outcomes likely to be achieved, provide services efficiently and assess the probability of generating sufficient
hosting capacity within budgeted costs and expenses during the contracted time period. In addition, we may not be able to obtain all
expected benefits, including tax abatements or government incentives offered in opportunity zones. The inability to accurately
estimate the factors upon which we base our contract pricing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Any failure in our critical systems, facilities or services we provide could lead to disruptions in our and our customers’
businesses and could harm our reputation and result in financial penalty and legal liabilities, which would reduce our revenue and
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The critical systems of the facilities we operate and the services we provide are subject to failure. Any failure in the critical
systems of any facility we operate or services that we provide, including a breakdown in critical plant, equipment or services, routers,
switches or other equipment, power supplies or network connectivity, whether or not within our control, could result in service
interruptions impacting our operations as well as equipment damage, which could significantly disrupt our business operations and the
operations of our customers, harm our reputation and reduce our revenue. Any failure or downtime in one of the facilities that we
operate impact mining rewards generated by us and reduce the profitability of our customers.
The total destruction or severe impairment of any of the facilities we operate could result in significant downtime of our
operations and services and loss of customer data. Since our ability to generate revenue depends on our ability to provide highly
reliable service, even minor interruptions in our operations could harm our reputation and negatively impact our revenue and
profitability. Our ability to generate revenue and the services we provide are subject to failures resulting from numerous factors,
including:
•power loss, curtailment and disruption;
19
•equipment failure;
•human error or accidents;
•theft, sabotage and vandalism;
•failure by us or our suppliers to provide adequate service or maintain our equipment;
•network connectivity downtime and fiber cuts;
•service interruptions resulting from server relocation;
•security breaches of our infrastructure;
•improper building maintenance;
•physical, electronic and cybersecurity breaches;
•animal incursions;
•fire, earthquake, hurricane, tornado, flood and other natural disasters;
•extreme temperatures;
•water damage;
•public health emergencies;
•riots, protests and disorder; and
•terrorism, war and hostilities.
Moreover, service interruptions and equipment failures may expose us to potential legal liability. As our services are critical to
our customers’ business operations, any disruption in our services could result in lost profits of or other indirect or consequential
damages to our customers. Our customer contracts typically contain provisions limiting our liability for breach of such agreements, a
court may not enforce any contractual limitations on our liability in the event that one of our customers brings a lawsuit against us as
the result of a service interruption that they may ascribe to us. The outcome of any such lawsuit would depend on the specific facts of
the case and any legal and policy considerations that we may not be able to mitigate. In such cases, we could be liable for substantial
damage awards, which would as a result have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may be vulnerable to physical security breaches, which could disrupt our operations and have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A party who is able to compromise the physical security measures protecting our facilities could cause interruptions or
malfunctions in our operations and misappropriate our property or the property of our customers. As we provide assurances to our
customers that we provide the highest level of security, such a compromise could be particularly harmful to our brand and reputation.
We may be required to expend significant capital and resources to protect against such threats or to alleviate problems caused by
breaches in security. As techniques used to breach security change frequently and are often not recognized until launched against a
target, we may not be able to implement new security measures in a timely manner or, if and when implemented, we may not be
certain whether these measures could be circumvented. Any breaches that may occur could expose us to increased risk of lawsuits,
regulatory penalties, loss of existing or potential customers, harm to our reputation and increases in our security costs, which could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Physical risks and regulatory changes relating to climate change may impact our costs, our access to materials and
resources and demand for cryptocurrencies, potentially adversely impacting our business, capital expenditures, results of
operations, financial condition and competitive position.
The physical risks of climate change may impact the availability and cost of materials and natural resources, sources and supply
of energy, demand for bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, and could increase our insurance and other operating costs, including,
potentially, to repair damage incurred as a result of extreme weather events or to renovate or retrofit facilities to better withstand
extreme weather events.
In addition, efforts are being made by the United States and foreign governments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions,
particularly those from coal combustion power plants, some of which plants we may rely upon for power. The added cost of any
20
environmental taxes, charges, assessments or penalties levied on such power plants could be passed on to us, increasing the cost to run
our facilities.
If our operations are disrupted due to physical impacts of climate change, or if environmental laws or regulations or industry
standards are either changed or adopted and impose significant operational restrictions and compliance requirements on our
operations, our business, capital expenditures, results of operations, financial condition and competitive position could be adversely
impacted.
If our information technology systems or those of the third parties with whom we work or our data, are or were
compromised, we could experience adverse consequences resulting from such compromise, including but not limited to regulatory
investigations or actions; litigations; fines and penalties; disruptions of our business operations; reputational harm; loss of
revenue or profits; and other adverse consequences.
Threats to network and data security are increasingly diverse and sophisticated. Security breaches, computer malware and
computer hacking attacks have been a prevalent concern in our businesses. Such threats are prevalent and continue to rise, are
increasingly difficult to detect, and come from a variety of sources, including traditional computer “hackers,” threat actors,
“hacktivists,” organized criminal threat actors, personnel (such as through theft or misuse), sophisticated nation states, and nation-
state-supported actors. Despite our efforts and processes to prevent these, our computer servers and computer systems may be
vulnerable to cybersecurity risks.
We and the third parties with whom we work are subject to a variety of evolving threats, including, but not limited to, social-
engineering attacks (including through deepfakes, which may be increasingly more difficult to identify as fake, and phishing attacks),
malicious code (such as viruses and worms), malware (including as a result of advanced persistent threat intrusions), denial-of-service
attacks, credential stuffing attacks, credential harvesting, physical or electronic break-ins, employee misconduct or error , ransomware
attacks, supply-chain attacks, software bugs, server malfunctions, software or hardware failures, loss of data or other information
technology assets, adware, attacks enhanced or facilitated by AI, and other similar disruptions. In particular, severe ransomware
attacks are becoming increasingly prevalent and can lead to significant interruptions in our operations, ability to provide our services,
reputational harm, and diversion of funds. Extortion payments may alleviate the negative impact of ransomware attack, but we may be
unwilling or unable to make such payments due to, for example, applicable laws or regulations prohibiting such payments.
It may be difficult and/or costly to detect, investigate, mitigate, contain, and remediate a security incident. Our efforts to do so
may not be successful. Actions taken by us or the third parties with whom we work to detect, investigate, mitigate, contain, and
remediate a security incident could result in outages, data losses, and disruptions of our business. Threat actors may also gain access to
other networks and systems after a compromise of our networks and systems. For example, threat actors may use an initial
compromise of one part of our environment to gain access to other parts of our environment, or leverage a compromise of our
networks or systems to gain access to the networks or systems of third parties with whom we work, such as through phishing or supply
chain attacks.
Additionally, future and past business transactions (such as acquisitions or integrations) could expose us to additional
cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities, as our systems could be negatively affected by vulnerabilities present in acquired or integrated
entities’ systems and technologies. Furthermore, we may discover security issues that were not found during due diligence of such
acquired or integrated entities, and it may be difficult to integrate companies into our information technology environment and
security program.
We rely on third parties to operate critical business systems to process sensitive information in a variety of contexts. Our ability
to monitor these third parties’ information security practices is limited, and these third parties may not have adequate information
security measures in place. If the third parties with whom we work experience a security incident or other interruption, we could
experience adverse consequences. While we might be entitled to damages if the third parties with whom we work fail to satisfy their
privacy or security-related obligations to us, any award may be insufficient to cover our damages, or we may be unable to recover such
award. In addition, supply-chain attacks have increased in frequency and severity, and we cannot guarantee that third parties’
infrastructure in our supply chain or that of the third parties with whom we work have not been compromised.
Our digital infrastructure and systems may be breached due to the actions of outside parties, error or malfeasance of one of our
employees, or otherwise, and, as a result, an unauthorized party may obtain access to our digital asset accounts, private keys, data or
digital assets. Although we implement a number of security procedures with various elements such as two-factor verification,
segregated accounts and secured facilities and plan to implement the maintenance of data on computers and/or storage media that is
not directly connected to, or accessible from, the internet and/or networked with other computers (“cold storage”), to minimize the risk
21
of loss, damage and theft, and we update such security procedures whenever reasonably practicable, there can be no assurance that
these measures will be effective and we may be unable to prevent such loss, damage or theft, whether caused intentionally,
accidentally or by an act of God. Further, we have and may in the future experience delays in deploying remedial measures and
patches designed to address identified vulnerabilities. Vulnerabilities could be exploited and result in security incidents.
Additionally, outside parties may attempt to fraudulently induce our employees to disclose sensitive information in order to
gain access to our infrastructure. As the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems
change frequently, or may be designed to remain dormant until a predetermined event, and often are not recognized until launched
against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative measures. As technological
change occurs, the security threats to our bitcoin will likely adapt and previously unknown threats may emerge. Our ability to adopt
technology in response to changing security needs or trends may pose a challenge to the safekeeping of our digital assets. To the
extent we are unable to identify and mitigate or stop new security threats, our digital assets may be subject to theft, loss, destruction or
other attack.
Any of the previously identified or similar threats have in the past and may in the future cause a security incident or other
interruption that have in the past and may in the future result in unauthorized, unlawful, or accidental acquisition, modification,
destruction, loss, alteration, encryption, disclosure of, or access to our sensitive information or our information technology systems, or
those of the third parties with whom we work. A security incident or other interruption could disrupt our ability (and that of third
parties with whom we work) to provide our services.
We may incur significant costs or modify our business activities to try to protect against security incidents. Certain data privacy
and security obligations have required us to implement and maintain specific security measures or industry-standard or reasonable
security measures to protect our digital assets, sensitive information, and information technology systems, Applicable data privacy and
security obligations may require us, or we may voluntarily choose, to notify relevant stakeholders, including affected individuals,
customers, regulators, and investors, of security incidents, or to take other actions, such as providing credit monitoring and identity
theft protection services. Such disclosures and related actions can be costly, and the disclosure or the failure to comply with such
applicable requirements could lead to adverse consequences.
Any of these events could expose us to liability, damage our reputation, reduce customer confidence in our services and
otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, we believe that as
our assets grow, we may become a more appealing target for security threats, such as hackers and malware. If an actual or perceived
breach of our digital asset accounts occurs, the market perception of our effectiveness could be harmed.
Our contracts may not contain limitations of liability, and even where they do, there can be no assurance that limitations of
liability in our contracts are sufficient to protect us from liabilities, damages, or claims related to our data privacy and security
obligations.
In addition to experiencing a security incident, third parties may gather, collect, or infer sensitive information about us from
public sources, data brokers, or other means that reveals competitively sensitive details about our organization and could be used to
undermine our competitive advantage or market position. Additionally, sensitive information of the Company or our customers could
be leaked, disclosed, or revealed as a result of or in connection with our employees’, personnel’s, or vendors’ use of generative AI
technologies.
We are subject to stringent and evolving U.S. and foreign laws, regulations, and rules, contractual obligations, industry
standards, policies and other obligations related to data privacy and security. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such
obligations could lead to regulatory investigations or actions; litigation (including class claims) and mass arbitration demands;
fines and penalties; a disruption of our business operations; reputational harm; loss of revenue or profits; loss of customers or
sales and other adverse business consequences.
The Company processes personal data and other sensitive and confidential information, which subjects it to various obligations
related to data privacy and security. In the ordinary course of business, we collect, receive, store, process, generate, use, transfer,
disclose, make accessible, protect, secure, dispose of, transmit, and share (collectively, process) personal data and other sensitive
information, including proprietary and confidential business data, trade secrets, intellectual property, and sensitive third-party data.
Our data processing activities subject us to numerous data privacy and security obligations, such as various laws, regulations,
guidance, industry standards, external and internal privacy and security policies, contractual requirements, and other obligations
relating to data privacy and security.
22
In the United States, federal, state, and local governments have enacted numerous data privacy and security laws, including data
breach notification laws, personal data privacy laws, consumer protection laws (e.g., Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act),
and other similar laws (e.g., wiretapping laws). Numerous U.S. states have enacted comprehensive privacy laws that impose certain
obligations on covered businesses, including providing specific disclosures in privacy notices and affording residents with certain
rights concerning their personal data. As applicable, such rights may include the right to access, correct, or delete certain personal
data, and to opt-out of certain data processing activities, such as targeted advertising, profiling, and automated decision-making. The
exercise of these rights may impact our business and ability to provide our services. Certain states also impose stricter requirements
for processing certain personal data, including sensitive information, such as conducting data privacy impact assessments. These state
laws allow for statutory fines for noncompliance. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”) applies to
personal data of consumers, business representatives, and employees who are California residents, and requires businesses to provide
specific disclosures in privacy notices and honor requests of such individuals to exercise certain privacy rights. The CCPA provides
for fines and allows private litigants affected by certain data breaches to recover significant statutory damages.
Our use of AI/ML technologies may be subject to certain privacy obligations. Other laws governing certain data or sectors may
apply to our operations. We may be unable to transfer personal data from Europe and other jurisdictions to the United States or other
countries due to data localization requirements or limitations on cross-border data flows. We are also subject to contractual obligations
and policies related to data privacy and security, and our efforts to comply with such obligations may not be successful. We publish
privacy policies, marketing materials, whitepapers, and other statements, concerning data privacy, and security. Regulators in the
United States are increasingly scrutinizing these statements, and if these policies, materials or statements are found to be deficient,
lacking in transparency, deceptive, unfair, misleading, or misrepresentative of our practices, we may be subject to investigation,
enforcement actions by regulators or other adverse consequences.
Obligations related to data privacy and security are quickly changing, becoming increasingly stringent, and creating uncertainty.
Additionally, these obligations may be subject to differing applications and interpretations, which may be inconsistent or conflict
among jurisdictions. Preparing for and complying with these obligations requires us to devote significant resources, which may
necessitate changes to our services, information technologies, systems, and practices and to those of any third parties that process
personal data on our behalf. We may at times fail (or perceived to have failed) in our efforts to comply with our data privacy and
security obligations. Moreover, despite our efforts, our personnel or third parties with whom we work may fail to comply with such
obligations, which could negatively impact our business operations. Any failure (or perceived failure) by us or a third party with
whom we work with to comply with applicable data privacy and security obligations could subject us to litigation (including class
claims), mass arbitration demands, proceedings, actions or investigations by governmental entities, authorities, private parties, or
regulators; additional reporting requirements and/or oversight; bans or restrictions on processing personal data; and orders to destroy
or not use personal data.
Our future success depends on our ability to keep pace with rapid technological changes that could make our current or
future technologies less competitive or obsolete.
Rapid, significant, and disruptive technological changes continue to impact our industry. The infrastructure at our facilities may
become less marketable due to demand for new processes and technologies, including, without limitation: (i) new processes to deliver
power to, or eliminate heat from, computer systems; (ii) customer demand for additional redundancy capacity; (iii) new technology
that permits higher levels of critical load and heat removal than our facilities are currently designed to provide; (iv) an inability of the
power supply to support new, updated or upgraded technology; and (v) a shift to more power-efficient transaction validation protocols.
In addition, the systems that connect our facilities to the internet and other external networks may become insufficient, including with
respect to latency, reliability and diversity of connectivity.
Even if we succeed in adapting to new processes and technologies, our use of such new processes or technology may not have a
positive impact on our financial performance. For example, we could incur substantial additional costs if we needed to materially
improve our hosting center infrastructure through the implementation of new systems or new server technologies that require levels of
critical load and heat removal that our facilities are not currently designed to provide. In addition, if one of our new offerings were
competitive to our prior offerings and represented an adequate or superior alternative, customers could decide to abandon prior
offerings that produce higher revenue or better margins for the new offering. Therefore, the adaptation to new processes and
technologies could result in lower revenue, lower margins and/or higher costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
23
We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property rights and other proprietary rights, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to obtain broad protection in the United States or internationally for all of our existing and future
intellectual property and other proprietary rights, and we may not be able to obtain effective protection for our intellectual property
and other proprietary rights in any country where we may operate. Protecting our intellectual property rights and other proprietary
rights may require significant expenditure of our financial, managerial and operational resources. Moreover, the steps that we may
take to protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights may not be adequate to protect such rights or prevent third parties
from infringing or misappropriating such rights. Any of our intellectual property rights and other proprietary rights, whether
registered, unregistered, issued or unissued, may be challenged by others or invalidated through administrative proceedings and/or
litigation.
We may be required to spend significant resources to secure, maintain, monitor and protect our intellectual property rights and
other proprietary rights. Despite our efforts, we may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing upon, misappropriating or
otherwise violating our intellectual property rights and other proprietary rights. We may initiate claims, administrative proceedings
and/or litigation against others for infringement, misappropriation or violation of our intellectual property rights or other proprietary
rights to enforce and/or maintain the validity of such rights. Any such action, if initiated, whether or not it is resolved in our favor,
could result in significant expense to us, and divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel, which may have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may infringe on third-party intellectual property rights or other proprietary rights, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our commercial success depends on our ability to operate without infringing third-party intellectual property rights or other
proprietary rights. For example, there may be issued patents of which we are not aware that our services or products infringe on. Also,
there may be patents we believe we do not infringe on, but that we may ultimately be found to by a court of law or government
regulatory agency. Moreover, patent applications are in some cases maintained in secrecy until patents are issued. Because patents can
take many years to issue, there may be currently pending applications of which we are unaware that may later result in issued patents
that our services or products allegedly infringe on.
If a third party brings any claim against us based on third-party intellectual property rights and/or other proprietary rights, we
will be required to spend significant resources to defend and challenge such claim, as well as to invalidate any such rights. Any such
claim, if initiated against us, whether or not it is resolved in our favor, could result in significant expense to us, and divert the efforts of
our technical and management personnel, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Our success is dependent on the ability of our management team and our ability to attract, develop, motivate and retain
other well-qualified employees, which may be more difficult, costly or time-consuming than expected.
Our success depends largely on the development and execution of our business strategy by our senior management team. We
cannot assure you that our management will work well together, work well with our other existing employees or successfully execute
our business strategy in the near-term or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Our future success also depends on our continuing ability to attract, develop, motivate and retain highly qualified and skilled
management and other employees. It is difficult to locate experienced executives in our industry. Further, competition for facility
design, construction management, operations, data processing, engineering, IT, risk management and sales and marketing and other
highly skilled personnel is extremely intense. We may not be able to hire and retain these personnel at compensation levels consistent
with our existing compensation and salary structure at this stage in our development. We may be unable to attract and retain our senior
executives and other key personnel, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
24
A slowdown in market and economic conditions, particularly those impacting the cloud computing, machine learning and
AI industries, the demand for high-density colocation infrastructure and services, and the blockchain industry and the blockchain
hosting market, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We and our customers are affected by general business and economic conditions in the United States and globally, particularly
those impacting the cloud computing, machine learning and AI industries. These conditions include short-term and long-term interest
rates, inflation, money supply, political issues, legislative and regulatory changes, including the imposition of new tariffs affecting our
or our customers’ products and services, fluctuations in both debt and equity capital markets and broad trends in industry and finance,
all of which are beyond our control. Macroeconomic conditions that affect the economy and the economic outlook of the United States
and the rest of the world could adversely affect our customers and vendors, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business is heavily impacted by social, political, economic and other events and circumstances in the United States and
in countries outside of the United States, most particularly Asian and other non-Western countries.
Our business is heavily impacted by social, political, economic and other events and circumstances in the United States and in
countries outside of the United States, most particularly in Asian and other non-Western countries. These events and circumstances are
largely outside of our influence and control. We believe that nation states are actively mining bitcoin for their own treasuries,
increasing network hash rate, reducing our share of network hash rate, and thereby reducing our revenue, profitability and financial
results of operations.
Global conflict could negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial conditions.
Unforeseen global events, such as the armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine and the Israel-Hamas conflict, could
adversely affect our business and results of operations. These and similar conflicts, including any resulting sanctions, export controls
or other restrictive actions that may be imposed by the United States and/or other countries, have created global security concerns that
could result in a regional conflict and otherwise have a lasting impact on regional and global economies, any or all of which could
adversely affect our business and results of operations. To the extent that these conflicts have increased the global cost of energy and
disrupted the demand for and price of bitcoin, it has and could continue to have an impact on our business. Sanctions, bans or other
economic actions in response to conflicts could result in an increase in costs and disruptions to the Company. The extent of such items
is not presently known, and any of them could negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Changes in tariffs or import restrictions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Much of the equipment necessary for high-density colocation and almost entirely all of the equipment necessary for digital asset
mining is manufactured outside of the United States. There is currently significant uncertainty about the future relationship between
the United States and various other countries, including China, the European Union, Canada, and Mexico, with respect to trade
policies, treaties, tariffs and customs duties, and taxes. For example, since 2019, the U.S. government has implemented significant
changes to U.S. trade policy with respect to China. These tariffs have subjected certain digital asset mining equipment manufactured
overseas to additional import duties of up to 25%. The amount of the additional tariffs and the number of products subject to them has
changed numerous times based on action by the U.S. government. These tariffs have increased costs of digital asset mining equipment,
and new or additional tariffs or other restrictions on the import of equipment necessary for digital asset mining could have a material
We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, which has resulted in the
ineffectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. While we are working to remediate the identified material weakness, we cannot
assure you whether or when we will be successful in remediating the identified material weakness or that additional material
weaknesses will not be identified in the future. Failure to maintain an effective system of internal control may result in material
misstatements of our financial statements or cause us to fail to meet our periodic reporting obligations.
In connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, management
identified the following material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting: the Company did not effectively
operate controls to account for intended demolition of building and infrastructure assets, including evaluation of impairment, related to
the conversion of facilities from digital asset mining operations to HPC colocation infrastructure due to insufficient complement of
trained personnel.
25
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there
is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected
on a timely basis. As described in Note 3 — Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II, to the
consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, this material weakness resulted in the restatement of
our previously issued consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2024, the year ended December 31, 2024, the three months ended March 31, 2025, the three and six
months ended June 30, 2025, and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025.
With the oversight of our senior management and Audit Committee, we have instituted plans to remediate the material
weakness and will continue to take remediation steps, including (i) implementing additional training for accounting personnel on the
evaluation of novel transactions related to property, plant and equipment, and (ii) implementing additional levels of management
review and oversight, including consultation with external technical accounting resources as necessary, over significant accounting
conclusions related to property, plant and equipment, including those involving the application of accounting guidance to novel or
non-routine transactions.
While we believe the measures described above will remediate the material weakness identified and strengthen our internal
control over financial reporting, we cannot assure you that the measures we have taken to date, or any measures we may take in the
future, will be sufficient to remediate the control deficiencies that have led to a material weakness in our internal control over financial
reporting or that they will prevent or avoid potential future material weaknesses.
If our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting are not effective, the reliability of our
financial reporting, investor confidence and the value of our securities could be materially and adversely affected. Any failure to
implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could result in additional errors in our financial statements
that could require further restatement, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, and cause investors to lose confidence in our
reported financial information, any of which could adversely affect the trading price of our securities.
For more information relating to our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, the
material weakness and our remediation efforts, see Part II, Item 9A., Controls and Procedures of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We may be required to record long-lived asset impairment charges, which could result in a significant charge to earnings.
Under GAAP, we review our long-lived assets, such as fixed assets and intangible assets, for impairment when events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. A significant portion of our total assets consists of fixed
assets. Factors that may be considered in assessing whether long-lived assets may not be recoverable include reduced estimates of
future cash flows and slower growth rates in our industry. We may experience unforeseen circumstances that adversely affect the
value of our fixed assets and trigger an evaluation of the recoverability of the recorded fixed assets. Our results of operations may be
materially impacted if we are required to record a significant charge due to an impairment of our fixed assets. See financial statement
Note 5 — Property, Plant, and Equipment and Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, for discussions of recently recognized impairments.
Losses relating to our business may be uninsured, or insurance may be limited.
Our hosting operations are subject to hazards and risks normally associated with the daily operations of facilities. Currently, we
maintain various insurance policies for business interruption for lost profits, property and casualty, public liability, commercial
employee, workers’ compensation, personal property and auto liability. Our business interruption insurance for lost profits includes
coverage for business interruptions, our property and casualty insurance includes coverage for equipment breakdowns and our
commercial employee insurance includes employee group insurance. We believe our insurance coverage adequately covers the risks of
our daily business operations. However, our current insurance policies may be insufficient in the case of prolonged, catastrophic or
certain other events. Further, the digital assets held by us are not insured. The occurrence of any event that is not entirely covered by
our insurance policies may result in interruption of our operations, subject us to significant losses or liabilities and damage our
reputation as a provider of business continuity services.
Our business is highly dependent on a small number of digital asset mining equipment suppliers.
Our business is highly dependent upon a few digital asset mining equipment suppliers providing an adequate and timely supply
of new generation digital asset mining machines at economical prices. The growth in our business is dependent in large part on the
availability of new generation mining machines offered for sale at a price conducive to profitable digital asset mining, as well as the
26
trading price of digital assets such as bitcoin. The market price and availability of new mining machines fluctuate with the price of
bitcoin and can be volatile. Higher bitcoin prices increase the demand and cost for mining equipment. In addition, as more companies
seek to enter the mining industry, the demand for machines may outpace supply and create mining machine equipment shortages.
Digital asset mining equipment suppliers, may not be able to keep pace with any surge in demand for mining equipment. Further,
manufacturing mining machine purchase contracts are not favorable to purchasers and we may have little or no recourse in the event a
mining machine manufacturer defaults on its mining machine delivery commitments. If we are not able to obtain a sufficient number
of digital asset mining machines at favorable prices, our growth expectations, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations
will be negatively impacted.
Miner manufacturers may continue requiring significant advance deposits before orders are fulfilled and delivered.
Historically, miner manufacturers have required advance deposits for miner purchases. These deposits tie up significant
amounts of cash several months before mining machines are received and operable to generate revenue. These advance deposits
further drive the financial burden of operating a capital-intensive business. Miner manufacturers holding a deposit from the Company
may go out of business before delivering purchased miners, or for other reasons fail to deliver the miners associated with the deposit.
There is no certainty that, in such circumstances, we would succeed in recovering any of our deposit, which could materially and
adversely affect its business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our reliance on third-party mining pool service providers for our earned mining reward payouts may have a negative
impact on our operations.
We utilize third party mining pools to receive our earned mining rewards from a given network. Mining pools allow mining
participants to combine their processing power, which increases the chances of solving a block and the pool getting paid by the
network. Contractually determined rewards are distributed by the pool operator, proportionally to our contribution to the pool’s overall
mining power used to generate each block. We are dependent on the accuracy of the mining pool operator’s record keeping to
accurately record our proportion of the total processing power provided to the pool. While we have internal methods of tracking both
our power provided and the total power used by the pool, the mining pool operator uses its own method to determine our proportion of
the pool’s total rewards. We have little means of recourse against the mining pool operator if we determine the proportion of the
reward paid out to us by a mining pool operator is incorrect, other than leaving the pool. If we are unable to consistently obtain
accurate proportionate rewards from our mining pool operators, we may experience reduced reward for our efforts, which would have
an adverse effect on our business and operations.
If there are significant changes to the method of validating blockchain transactions, such changes could reduce demand for
digital assets like bitcoin.
New blockchain consensus protocols are continuously being deployed, and existing and new protocols are in a state of constant
change and development. While certain blockchains currently employ a “proof-of-work” consensus algorithm, whereby transaction
processors called “miners” are required to expend significant amounts of electrical and computing power to solve complex
mathematical problems in order to validate transactions and create new blocks in a blockchain, there may be a shift towards adopting
alternative consensus algorithms. These protocols may include a “proof-of-stake” algorithm or an algorithm based on a protocol other
than proof-of-work, which may decrease the reliance on computing power as an advantage to validating blocks. Our mining operations
are currently designed to primarily support Bitcoin and other protocols employing a proof-of-work consensus algorithm. Should the
Bitcoin consensus protocol shift from a proof-of-work consensus algorithm to a proof-of-stake consensus algorithm, or should new
blockchains employ a proof-of-stake consensus algorithm, mining would require less energy and may render any company that
maintains advantages in the current climate (for example, from lower priced electricity, processing, real estate or hosting) less
competitive.
As a result of our efforts to optimize and improve the efficiency of our digital asset mining operations, we may be exposed to
the risk in the future of losing the benefit of our capital investments and the competitive advantage we hope to gain from this as a
result, and may be negatively impacted if a switch to proof-of-stake validation were to occur. Any such change to transaction
validating protocols could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
27
The further development and acceptance of consensus algorithms and other cryptographic and algorithmic protocols are
subject to a variety of factors that are difficult to evaluate. The slowing or stoppage of development or acceptance of blockchain
networks and digital assets would have an adverse material effect on the successful development of the mining operation and value
of earned digital assets.
The use of digital assets to, among other things, buy and sell goods and services, is part of a new and rapidly evolving industry
that employs digital assets based upon a computer-generated mathematical and/or cryptographic protocol. The future of this industry is
subject to a high degree of uncertainty. The factors affecting the further development of this industry include, but are not limited to:
•continued worldwide growth in the adoption and use of digital assets and blockchain technologies;
•government and quasi-government regulation of digital assets and their use, or restrictions on or regulation of access to and
operations of digital asset mining;
•changes in consumer demographics and public tastes and preferences;
•the maintenance and development of the open-source software protocols or similar digital asset systems;
•the availability and popularity of other forms or methods of buying and selling goods and services, or trading assets including
new means of using fiat currencies;
•general economic conditions and the regulatory environment relating to digital assets; and
•negative consumer perception of digital assets, including digital assets specifically and digital assets generally.
A decline in the popularity or acceptance of digital assets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to our Limited Operating History
We operate in a rapidly developing industry and have an evolving business model with a limited history of generating
revenue from our services. In addition, our evolving business model increases the complexity of our business, which makes it
difficult to evaluate our future business prospects and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Our business model has evolved in the past and continues to do so. After originally being founded in order to engage in the
business of verifying and confirming transactions on a blockchain (also known as transaction processing, or “mining”), we have begun
the provision of digital infrastructure colocation services to a third party engaged in high performance computing and have announced
plans to convert most of our existing facilities to provide colocation services to other high-density colocation customers. We have
generated limited revenue from providing high-density colocation services, and we do not know whether our change in business model
will be successful. To date, our revenue has primarily come from digital asset mining for our own account and digital asset mining
hosting services. The evolution of and modifications to our business strategy will continue to increase the complexity of our business
and have placed significant strain on our management, personnel, operations, systems, technical performance and financial resources.
Future additions to or modifications of our business strategy are likely to have similar effects. Further, any new services that we offer
that are not favorably received by the market could damage our reputation or our brand. We may not ever generate sufficient revenues
or achieve profitably in the future or have adequate working capital to meet our obligations.
We cannot be certain that our current business strategy or any new or revised business strategies will be successful or that we
will successfully address the risks we face. In the event that we do not effectively evaluate future business prospects, successfully
implement new strategies or adapt to our evolving industry, it will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
We may not be able to compete effectively against our current and future competitors, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The businesses in which we currently operate and the high-density colocation business in which we intend to grow are highly
innovative, rapidly evolving and characterized by healthy competition, experimentation, frequent introductions of new products and
services and uncertain and evolving industry and regulatory requirements. We expect competition to further intensify in the future as
existing and new competitors introduce new products or enhance existing products. We compete against a number of companies
operating both within the United States and abroad that have greater financial and other resources at their disposal. If we are unable to
28
compete successfully, or if competing successfully requires us to take costly actions in response to the actions of our competitors, our
business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.
We compete with other bitcoin miners and with a range of hosting providers and blockchain providers for some or all of the
services we offer. We face competition from numerous developers, owners and operators in the blockchain industry, including
technology companies, such as hyperscale cloud players, managed service providers and real estate investment trusts (“REITs”), some
of which own or lease properties similar to ours, or may do so in the future, in the same submarkets in which our properties are
located. Cloud offerings may also influence our customers to move workloads to cloud providers, which may reduce the services they
obtain from us. Our current and future competitors may vary from us in size, service offerings and geographic presence.
Competition is primarily centered on reputation and track record; design, size, quality, available power and geographic
coverage of hosting space; quality of installation and customer equipment repair services; relationships with equipment manufacturers
and ability to obtain replacement parts; technical and software expertise; and financial strength and price. Some of our current and
future competitors may have greater brand recognition, longer operating histories, stronger marketing, technical and financial
resources and access to greater and less expensive power than we do. In addition, many companies in the industry are consolidating,
which could further increase the market power of our competitors. Further, we also face significant competition from other users and/
or companies that are processing transactions on one or more digital asset networks, as well as other potential financial vehicles,
including securities, derivatives or futures backed by, or linked to, digital assets through entities similar to us, such as exchange-traded
funds. Market and financial conditions, and other conditions beyond our control, may make it more attractive to invest in other
financial vehicles, or to invest in digital assets directly. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations and potentially the value of any digital assets we hold or expect to acquire for our own account.
We have experienced difficulties in establishing relationships with banks, leasing companies, insurance companies and
other financial institutions to provide us with customary financial products and services, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
As an early stage company with operations focused in the digital asset mining industry, we have in the past experienced, and
may in the future experience, difficulties in establishing relationships with banks, leasing companies, insurance companies and other
financial institutions to provide us with customary leasing and financial products and services, such as bank accounts, lines of credit,
insurance and other related services, which are necessary for our operations. To the extent a significant portion of our business consists
of digital asset transaction mining, processing or hosting, we may in the future continue to experience difficulty obtaining additional
financial products and services on customary terms, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Risks Related to Regulatory Framework
Our interactions with a blockchain may expose us to specially designated nationals (“SDN”) or blocked persons or cause us
to violate provisions of law that did not contemplate distributed ledger technology.
The Office of Financial Assets Control of the U.S. Department of Treasury (“OFAC”) requires us to comply with its sanction
program and not conduct business with persons named on its SDN list. However, because of the pseudonymous nature of blockchain
transactions, we may inadvertently engage in transactions with persons named on OFAC’s SDN list. Our internal policies prohibit any
transactions with such SDN individuals, but we may not adequately determine the ultimate identity of the individual with whom we
transact with respect to selling digital assets. In addition, in the future, OFAC or another regulator, may require us to screen
transactions for OFAC addresses or other bad actors before including such transactions in a block, which may increase our compliance
costs, decrease our anticipated transaction fees and lead to decreased traffic on our network. Any of these factors, consequently, could
have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.
Moreover, federal law prohibits any U.S. person from knowingly or unknowingly possessing any visual depiction commonly
known as child pornography. Recent media reports have suggested that persons have imbedded such depictions on one or more
blockchains. Because our business requires us to download and retain one or more blockchains to effectuate our ongoing business, it is
possible that such digital ledgers contain prohibited depictions without our knowledge or consent. To the extent government
enforcement authorities literally enforce these and other laws and regulations that are impacted by decentralized distributed ledger
technology, we may be subject to investigation, administrative or court proceedings, and civil or criminal monetary fines and
penalties, all of which could harm our reputation and could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial
condition, and operating results.
29
If regulatory changes or interpretations of our activities require our registration as a money services business (“MSB”)
under the regulations promulgated by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) under the authority of the U.S.
Bank Secrecy Act, or otherwise under state laws, we may incur significant compliance costs, which could be substantial or cost-
prohibitive. If we become subject to these regulations, our costs in complying with them may have a material negative effect on our
business and the results of our operations.
To the extent that our activities cause us to be deemed an MSB under the regulations promulgated by FinCEN under the
authority of the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act, we may be required to comply with FinCEN regulations, including those that would mandate
us to implement anti-money laundering programs, make certain reports to FinCEN and maintain certain records.
To the extent that our activities would cause us to be deemed a “money transmitter” (“MT”) or equivalent designation, under
state law in any state in which we may operate, we may be required to seek a license or otherwise register with a state regulator and
comply with state regulations that may include the implementation of anti-money laundering programs, maintenance of certain records
and other operational requirements. For example, in August 2015, the New York State Department of Financial Services enacted the
first U.S. regulatory framework for licensing participants in “virtual currency business activity.” The regulations, known as the
“BitLicense,” are intended to focus on consumer protection and regulate the conduct of businesses that are involved in “virtual
currencies” in New York or with New York customers and prohibit any person or entity involved in such activity to conduct activities
without a license.
Such additional federal or state regulatory obligations may cause us to incur extraordinary expenses. Furthermore, we may not
be capable of complying with certain federal or state regulatory obligations applicable to MSBs and MTs. If we are deemed to be
subject to and determine not to comply with such additional regulatory and registration requirements, we may act to dissolve and
liquidate.
If we were deemed an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”),
applicable restrictions could make it impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated and could have a material adverse
effect on our business.
An issuer will generally be deemed to be an “investment company” for purposes of the 1940 Act if:
•it is an “orthodox” investment company because it is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily, or proposes to engage
primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities; or
•it is an inadvertent investment company because, absent an applicable exemption, it owns or proposes to acquire “investment
securities” having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash
items) on an unconsolidated basis.
We believe that we are not and will not be primarily engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities,
and we do not hold ourselves out as being engaged in those activities. We intend to hold ourselves out as a digital asset mining
business. Accordingly, we do not believe that we are an “orthodox” investment company as described in the first bullet point above.
While certain digital assets may be deemed to be securities, we do not believe that certain other digital assets, in particular
bitcoin, are securities; therefore, we believe that less than 40% of our total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash
items) on an unconsolidated basis will comprise digital assets that could be considered investment securities. Accordingly, we do not
believe that we are an inadvertent investment company by virtue of the 40% inadvertent investment company test as described in the
second bullet point above. Although we do not believe any of the digital assets we may own, acquire, earn or mine are securities, there
is still some regulatory uncertainty on the subject, see “-There is no one unifying principle governing the regulatory status of digital
assets nor whether digital assets are securities in any particular context. Regulatory changes or actions in one or more countries may
alter the nature of an investment in us or restrict the use of digital assets in a manner that adversely affects our business, prospects or
operations.” If certain digital assets, including bitcoin, were to be deemed securities, and consequently, investment securities by the
SEC, we could be deemed an inadvertent investment company. Similarly, if we were to acquire digital assets deemed investment
securities to hold for our own account or to engage in certain transactions, such as loan or repurchase transactions, we could be
deemed an inadvertent investment company.
If we were to be deemed an inadvertent investment company, we may seek to rely on Rule 3a-2 under the 1940 Act, which
allows an inadvertent investment company a grace period of one year from the earlier of (a) the date on which the issuer owns
securities and/or cash having a value exceeding 50% of the issuer’s total assets on either a consolidated or unconsolidated basis or (b)
the date on which the issuer owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of such
30
issuer’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. We are putting in place
policies that we expect will work to keep the investment securities held by us at less than 40% of our total assets, which may include
acquiring assets with our cash, liquidating our investment securities or seeking no-action relief or exemptive relief from the SEC if we
are unable to acquire sufficient assets or liquidate sufficient investment securities in a timely manner. As Rule 3a-2 is available to an
issuer no more than once every three years, and assuming no other exclusion were available to us, we would have to keep within the
40% limit for at least three years after we cease being an inadvertent investment company. This may limit our ability to make certain
investments or enter into joint ventures that could otherwise have a positive impact on our earnings. In any event, we do not intend to
become an investment company engaged in the business of investing and trading securities.
Finally, we believe we are not an investment company under Section 3(b)(1) of the 1940 Act because we are primarily engaged
in a non-investment company business.
The 1940 Act and the rules thereunder contain detailed parameters for the organization and operations of investment
companies. Among other things, the 1940 Act and the rules thereunder limit or prohibit transactions with affiliates, impose limitations
on the issuance of debt and equity securities, prohibit the issuance of stock options, and impose certain governance requirements. We
intend to continue to conduct our operations so that we will not be deemed to be an investment company under the 1940 Act.
However, if anything were to happen that would cause us to be deemed to be an investment company under the 1940 Act,
requirements imposed by the 1940 Act, including limitations on our capital structure, ability to transact business with affiliates and
ability to compensate key employees, could make it impractical for us to continue our business as currently conducted, impair the
agreements and arrangements between and among us and our senior management team and materially and adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Any change in the interpretive positions of the SEC or its staff with respect to digital asset mining firms could have a
material adverse effect on us.
We intend to conduct our operations so that we are not required to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act.
Specifically, we do not believe that bitcoin, are securities. The SEC Staff has not provided guidance with respect to the treatment of
these assets under the 1940 Act. To the extent the SEC Staff publishes new guidance with respect to these matters, we may be required
to adjust our strategy or assets accordingly. We may not be able to maintain our exclusion from registration as an investment company
under the 1940 Act. In addition, as a consequence of our seeking to avoid the need to register under the 1940 Act on an ongoing basis,
we may be limited in our ability to engage in digital asset mining operations or otherwise make certain investments or engage in
certain transactions, and these limitations could result in our holding assets we may wish to sell or selling assets we may wish to hold,
which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
U.S. federal and state laws and regulations of digital assets and digital asset intermediaries, such as digital asset exchanges
and custodians, may increase our compliance costs and adversely impact the market for digital assets.
Federal and state legislatures and regulatory agencies have already enacted and are expected to continue to introduce and enact
new laws and regulations to regulate digital asset issuers and intermediaries, such as digital asset exchanges and custodians. For
example, in July 2025, the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (“GENIUS Act”) was signed into
law, creating the first comprehensive regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. The U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S.
Congress have also passed separate bills covering potential market structure legislation that would regulate digital asset issuers and
intermediaries, which are currently under consideration (the “Proposed Market Structure Legislation”). In addition, the Federal
Reserve Board and certain U.S. agencies (including the SEC, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”),
FinCEN, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation), among other regulators, as well as the White House, have issued reports and releases concerning digital assets,
including bitcoin and digital asset markets. For example, in January 2025, the Acting SEC Chairman announced the launch of a crypto
task force dedicated to developing a comprehensive and clear regulatory framework for crypto assets, in contrast to the SEC’s prior
reliance on enforcement actions to regulate cryptocurrencies. The announcement of the SEC crypto task force was followed by a string
of SEC staff guidance covering memecoins, stablecoins, staking and other crypto products, as well as a series of no action letters
issued to crypto industry participants. More recently, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins gave a speech detailing the SEC’s “Project Crypto,”
including the potential of further exemptive relief.
However, the extent and content of any forthcoming laws and regulations are not yet ascertainable with certainty, and they may
not be ascertainable in the near future. It is possible that new laws and increased regulation and regulatory scrutiny may require the
Company to comply with certain regulatory regimes, which could result in new costs for the Company. In addition, new laws,
regulations, and regulatory actions could significantly restrict or eliminate the market for, or uses of, digital assets including bitcoin,
31
which could have a negative effect on the value of bitcoin, which in turn would have a negative effect on the value of the Company’s
securities.
Uncertain and evolving regulation of digital assets—including the absence of a single unifying standard for determining
whether a digital asset is a “security”—could require significant changes to our business, subject us to enforcement or litigation,
restrict the use of digital assets, and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and the market price
of our securities.
Digital assets exist within a fragmented and rapidly evolving global regulatory landscape. There is no single, uniform legal
principle that governs the regulatory status of digital assets across jurisdictions or even within a single jurisdiction, and the question of
whether, when, and under what facts a particular digital asset or activity constitutes a “security,” “commodity,” “money” or “property”
remains unsettled and highly fact-specific. U.S. federal and state regulators, foreign regulators, courts, and standards-setting bodies
have taken differing, and at times conflicting, positions on the characterization and regulation of digital assets and related activities.
For example, authorities have treated digital assets, depending on context, as securities, commodities, money or money equivalents,
property, or as a distinct class of digital financial assets subject to bespoke regimes. Some countries have imposed broad restrictions or
prohibitions on certain digital asset activities, while others have adopted comprehensive licensing frameworks specific to crypto asset
service providers. This patchwork of approaches results in overlapping, unclear, and changing obligations that can be difficult to
interpret and apply.
Within the United States, multiple regulatory regimes can apply to digital assets and related activities, including federal and
state securities laws, commodities and derivatives laws, money transmission and payments laws, banking and trust company laws,
consumer protection rules, anti-money laundering and sanctions requirements, and data and cybersecurity laws. U.S. federal regulators
and courts have reached differing conclusions regarding whether particular digital assets or transactions constitute securities or
commodities, and the scope of jurisdiction and applicable obligations may turn on nuanced and evolving interpretations. If a digital
asset that we hold, receive, or otherwise interact with were determined to be a security under U.S. federal or state law, the offer, sale,
custody, or secondary trading of that asset could become subject to extensive registration, disclosure, and conduct requirements, and
platforms or intermediaries facilitating related activity could be required to register under securities laws. Conversely, if a digital asset
or transaction is treated as a commodity or “retail commodity transaction,” additional regulation and oversight by commodities
regulators may apply. These determinations may occur through legislation, rulemaking, judicial decisions, or enforcement actions and
may be applied inconsistently across jurisdictions and over time.
As a result of this regulatory uncertainty, we face risks that include, among others, the need to modify, limit, or discontinue
certain activities; to obtain new licenses or registrations or comply with new standards and to enhance or redesign compliance,
surveillance, and reporting systems. New or revised rules—domestically or abroad—could, for example, require changes to how we
recognize, record, safeguard, transfer, or value digital assets; impose capital, reserve, segregation, or custody requirements; mandate
additional transaction monitoring, travel rule compliance, or sanctions screening; or alter permissible marketing, disclosures, and
consumer protections. Any of these developments could increase our costs, reduce operational flexibility, limit access to
counterparties or financial services, delay product development or market entry, or result in loss of revenue and market share.
Enforcement and supervisory activity add further uncertainty. U.S. and foreign authorities have pursued investigations and
actions alleging that certain digital assets are securities or otherwise subject to financial regulatory frameworks, that certain market
participants operated without required registrations or licenses, or that compliance programs were inadequate. Interpretive positions
can change, sometimes without clear transition periods or safe harbors, and adverse outcomes in litigation or enforcement against
industry participants could prompt us to reassess the regulatory status of digital assets with similar characteristics or to change our
business practices.
Legislative initiatives are also in flux. In the United States, Congress and state legislatures have considered proposals that could
redefine the allocation of jurisdiction between market regulators, create new registration categories for digital asset intermediaries, or
impose bespoke disclosure, market integrity, and customer protection requirements. Internationally, jurisdictions have adopted or are
implementing comprehensive regulatory frameworks for crypto asset service providers that may impose scope, licensing, prudential,
conduct, market abuse, and disclosure obligations different from or stricter than U.S. requirements. Divergent implementation
timelines and standards across countries can create conflicts of law, duplicative compliance burdens, and uncertainty regarding cross
border operations.
Tax and financial reporting requirements are likewise evolving. U.S. and foreign tax authorities continue to expand information
reporting and withholding regimes applicable to digital asset transactions and intermediaries. These requirements may be complex and
costly to implement, and failure to comply could result in penalties, enforcement actions, or customer attrition. Changes in tax,
32
accounting, or financial reporting standards or interpretations applicable to digital assets may also require us to modify policies,
systems, disclosures, and controls, which could affect reported results and comparability.
We cannot predict the timing, scope, direction, or impact of regulatory or legislative changes, supervisory priorities,
enforcement approaches, judicial decisions, or tax and reporting rules relating to digital assets. Any new law, rule, guidance,
interpretation, administrative action, or court decision—domestically or abroad—could result in heightened compliance obligations,
licensing or registration requirements, restrictions on our operations or on the use, transferability, or liquidity of digital assets,
increased costs, loss of customers or business partners, reputational harm, and exposure to civil, criminal, or administrative penalties.
Any of these outcomes could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations, and the
market price of our securities.
Increasing scrutiny and changing expectations from government regulators, investors, lenders, customers, and other market
participants with respect to our Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) policies may impose additional costs on us or
expose us to additional risks.
Companies across all industries and around the globe are facing increasing scrutiny relating to their ESG policies and
disclosures. Regulators, investors, lenders, customers and other market participants are increasingly focused on ESG practices and in
recent years have placed increasing importance on the implications and social cost of investments. The increased focus and activism
related to ESG may hinder our access to capital, as investors and lenders may reconsider their capital investment allocation as a result
of their assessment of our ESG practices. If our ESG practices do not meet evolving regulator, investor, lender, customer or other
industry stakeholder expectations and standards or if we do not adapt to or comply with regulator, investor, lender, customer or other
industry shareholder expectations and standards, our reputation, ability to attract and/or retain employees, financial condition and/or
share price could be negatively impacted. We may also incur additional costs if we do not adapt to or comply with stakeholder
expectations about our electricity usage and other ESG concerns. Our failure or perceived failure to adapt to or comply with existing
and potential government regulations, which are evolving but may relate to the suitable deployment of electric power, or which are
perceived to have not responded appropriately to the growing concern for ESG issues, our reputation would suffer which would have
similar negative impacts that could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may be subject to risks associated with misleading and/or fraudulent disclosure or use by the creators of digital assets.
Generally, we rely primarily on a combination of white papers and other disclosure documents prepared by the creators of
applicable digital assets, as well as on our management’s ability to obtain adequate information to evaluate the potential implications
of transacting in these digital assets. However, such white papers and other disclosure documents and information may contain
misleading and/or fraudulent statements (which may include statements concerning the creators’ ability to deliver in a timely fashion
the product and/or service disclosed in their white papers and other disclosure documents) and/or may not reveal any unlawful
activities by the creators. Recently, there has been an increasing number of investigations and lawsuits by the SEC and the CFTC
involving digital asset creators for fraud and misappropriation, among other charges. Additionally, FinCEN has increased its
enforcement efforts involving digital asset creators regarding compliance with anti-money laundering and Know-Your-Customer laws.
To the extent that any of these creators make misleading and/or fraudulent disclosures or do not comply with federal, state or
foreign laws, or if we are unable to uncover all material information about these digital assets and/or their creators, we may not be able
to make a fully informed business decision relating to our transacting in or otherwise involving such digital assets, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our compliance and risk management methods might not be effective and may result in outcomes that could adversely affect
our reputation, operating results, and financial condition.
Our ability to comply with applicable complex and evolving laws, regulations, and rules is largely dependent on the
establishment and maintenance of our compliance, audit, and reporting systems, as well as our ability to attract and retain qualified
compliance and other risk management personnel. While we plan to devote significant resources to develop policies and procedures to
identify, monitor and manage our risks, we cannot assure you that our policies and procedures will always be effective against all
types of risks, including unidentified or unanticipated risks, or that we will always be successful in monitoring or evaluating the risks
to which we are or may be exposed in all market environments.
33
Changes in accounting standards and interpretations for crypto assets could materially affect our financial statements,
results of operations, and the carrying value of our digital asset holdings, and could adversely impact our business and the market
price of our securities.
The accounting rules governing crypto assets continue to evolve and are subject to further change and interpretation by standard
setters and regulators, including the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the SEC. Recent changes in accounting
standards have already resulted in significant changes to how entities measure, present, and disclose crypto assets, including the
requirement to subsequently measure certain crypto assets at fair value with changes recognized in net income each reporting period
and to separately present those assets and related gains and losses in the financial statements. Additional amendments, interpretive
guidance, transition requirements, or clarifications could require us to change our accounting, revise our disclosures, and adjust prior
period presentations, as well as increase the volatility of our reported results. Any such changes could require substantial time and
resources to implement, and there can be no assurance that our future financial statements will be comparable to those in prior periods.
We cannot predict the timing or content of future changes to accounting standards or interpretations for crypto assets, nor can
we assure investors that we will not be required to make further changes to our accounting policies, reclassify prior‑period amounts, or
restate our financial statements. Any such actions could result in a loss of investor confidence in our reported results and could
materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Risks Related to our Indebtedness and Liquidity
We may incur additional indebtedness to execute our long-term growth strategy, which may reduce our profitability.
Our business requires significant capital, and we may require additional capital in the future to execute our growth strategy. For
the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we incurred approximately 729.0 million and $95.0 million in capital expenditures,
respectively. Historically, we have financed these investments through cash flows from operation and external borrowings. These
sources of capital may not be available to us in the future. Our ability to arrange new financing, either at the corporate level, a non-
recourse project-level subsidiary or otherwise, and the costs of such capital, are dependent on numerous factors, including credit
availability from banks and other financial institutions, investor confidence in us and the regional markets in which we operate,
maintenance of acceptable credit ratings or our financial performance and level of indebtedness. Other companies with which we
compete may have greater liquidity, more unencumbered assets, less indebtedness, greater access to credit and other financial
resources, lower cost structures, more effective risk management policies and procedures, greater ability to incur losses, longer-
standing relationships with customers, or greater flexibility in the timing of their sale of generation capacity and ancillary services than
we do. If we are unable to fund capital expenditures for any reason, we may not be able to capture available growth opportunities and
any such failure could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our indebtedness and liabilities could limit the cash flow available for our operations, expose us to risks that could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and impair our ability to satisfy our obligations under the notes.
As of December 31, 2025, we had approximately $1.09 billion aggregate principal amount of indebtedness for borrowed
money. We may also incur additional indebtedness to meet future financing needs. Our indebtedness could have significant negative
consequences for our security holders and our business, results of operations and financial condition by, among other things:
•increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions;
•limiting our ability to obtain additional financing;
•requiring the dedication of a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to service our indebtedness, which will
reduce the amount of cash available for other purposes;
•limiting our flexibility to plan for, or react to, changes in our business;
•diluting the interests of our existing stockholders as a result of issuing shares of our common stock upon conversion of the
notes; and
•placing us at a possible competitive disadvantage with competitors that are less leveraged than us or have better access to
capital.
Our business may not generate sufficient funds, and we may otherwise be unable to maintain sufficient cash reserves, to pay
amounts due under our indebtedness, including the notes, and our cash needs may increase in the future. In addition, any future
indebtedness that we may incur may contain financial and other restrictive covenants that limit our ability to operate our business,
raise capital or make payments under our other indebtedness. If we fail to comply with these covenants or to make payments under our
34
indebtedness when due, then we would be in default under that indebtedness, which could, in turn, result in that and our other
indebtedness becoming immediately payable in full.
We may be unable to raise the funds necessary to repurchase the 2029 Convertible Notes or the 2031 Convertible Notes for
cash following a fundamental change, the optional repurchase date, or during the free convertibility period, as applicable, or to
pay any cash amounts due upon conversion of 2029 Convertible Notes or the 2031 Convertible Notes, and our other indebtedness
may limit our ability to repurchase 2029 Convertible Notes or the 2031 Convertible Notes or pay cash upon their conversion.
Holders of the $460.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 3.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2029 (the “2029
Convertible Notes”), subject to a limited exception, may require us to repurchase their notes for cash following certain corporate
events that constitute a “fundamental change” equal to the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid
interest, if any, to, but excluding, the fundamental change repurchase date. From and after June 1, 2029, noteholders may convert their
notes at any time at their election until the close of business on the scheduled trading day immediately before September 1, 2029. The
Company will settle conversions by paying or delivering, as applicable, cash, shares of its common stock or a combination of cash and
shares of its common stock, at its election.
Further, holders of the $625.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 0.00% convertible senior notes due 2031 (the “2031
Convertible Notes”), subject to a limited exception, may require us to repurchase their notes on December 15, 2027 or following
certain corporate events that constitute a “fundamental change” at a cash repurchase price equal to the principal amount of the notes to
be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid special interest and additional interest, if any, to, but excluding, the optional repurchase date
or the fundamental change repurchase date, as applicable. From and after March 17, 2031, noteholders may convert their notes at any
time at their election until the close of business on the scheduled trading day immediately before June 15, 2031. The Company will
settle conversions by paying or delivering, as applicable, cash, shares of its common stock or a combination of cash and shares of its
common stock, at its election.
Both the 2029 Convertible Notes and 2031 Convertible Notes might also be converted by noteholders based on certain
triggering events based on the trading price of the Company’s common stock or the note, as applicable.
We may not have enough available cash or be able to obtain financing at the time we are required to repurchase the 2029
Convertible Notes or 2031 Convertible Notes or pay any cash amounts due upon conversion of the 2029 Convertible Notes or 2031
Convertible Notes. In addition, applicable law, regulatory authorities and the agreements governing our other indebtedness may
restrict our ability to repurchase the 2029 Convertible Notes or 2031 Convertible Notes or pay any cash amounts due upon conversion.
Our failure to repurchase the 2029 Convertible Notes or 2031 Convertible Notes or pay any cash amounts due upon conversion when
required under the indenture governing the 2029 Convertible Notes or the indenture governing the 2031 Convertible Notes, as
applicable, will constitute a default under the applicable indenture. A default under either indenture or the fundamental change itself
could also lead to a default under agreements governing our other indebtedness, which may result in that other indebtedness becoming
immediately payable in full. We may not have sufficient funds to satisfy all amounts due under the other indebtedness, the 2029
Convertible Notes or the 2031 Convertible Notes.
Provisions in our indentures could delay or prevent an otherwise beneficial takeover of us.
Certain provisions in the 2029 Convertible Notes or 2031 Convertible Notes, or any future notes, and the indentures governing
these notes could make a third-party attempt to acquire us more difficult or expensive. For example, if a takeover constitutes a
fundamental change, then, except as described in this offering memorandum, noteholders will have the right to require us to
repurchase their notes for cash. In addition, if a takeover constitutes a make-whole fundamental change, then we may be required to
temporarily increase the conversion rate. In either case, and in other cases, our obligations under the 2029 Convertible Notes or 2031
Convertible Notes, or any future notes, and the indentures governing these notes could increase the cost of acquiring us or otherwise
discourage a third party from acquiring us or removing incumbent management, including in a transaction that noteholders or holders
of our common stock may view as favorable.
The conditional conversion feature of the notes, if triggered, may adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations.
In the event the conditional conversion feature of the 2029 Convertible Notes or 2031 Convertible Notes is triggered,
noteholders will be entitled to convert the notes at any time during specified periods at their option. If one or more noteholders elect to
convert their notes, unless we elect to satisfy our conversion obligation by delivering solely shares of our common stock (other than
paying cash in lieu of delivering any fractional share), we would be required to settle a portion or all of our conversion obligation
35
through the payment of cash, which could adversely affect our liquidity. In addition, even if noteholders do not elect to convert their
notes, we could be required under applicable accounting rules to reclassify all or a portion of the outstanding principal of the notes as a
current rather than long-term liability, which would result in a material reduction of our net working capital.
Risks Related to Taxes
Our ability to use some or all of our net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards and other tax attributes to offset future
income may be limited.
As of December 31, 2025, we had U.S. federal and state net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of approximately
$727.8 million and $184.2 million, respectively, U.S. federal and state capital loss carryforwards of approximately $220.7 million and
$47.8 million, respectively, and certain other tax attributes, including disallowed business interest expense carryforwards under
Section 163(j) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Internal Revenue Code”), that could be utilized to offset future taxable
income. The amount of our tax attributes are subject to examination and adjustment by applicable taxing authorities. Our federal
NOLs can be carried forward indefinitely, our state NOL carryforwards begin to expire in 2033 and our capital loss carryforwards
begin to expire in 2027.
Under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code, if a corporation (or a consolidated group) undergoes an “ownership
change,” its ability to utilize certain of its federal tax attributes (including NOL and capital loss carryforwards) to offset certain of its
taxable income may be subject to certain limitations. In general, an ownership change occurs if the aggregate stock ownership of
certain shareholders (generally 5% shareholders, applying certain look-through and aggregation rules) increases by more than 50%
over such shareholders’ lowest percentage ownership during the testing period (generally three years). Similar rules may apply under
applicable state tax law.
Certain equity trading activity and other actions prior to the Effective Date of the Plan of Reorganization could have resulted in
an ownership change for purposes of Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code independent of the Plan of Reorganization,
which could adversely affect our ability to utilize our tax attributes to a greater extent than an ownership change occurring as a result
of the consummation of the Plan of Reorganization. In an attempt to minimize the likelihood of such an ownership change occurring,
we obtained a final order from the Bankruptcy Court authorizing certain protective equity trading procedures.
Based upon the evaluation of ownership changes occurring upon the Company’s emergence from bankruptcy on January 23,
2024, an ownership change likely occurred, which may limit our ability to utilize our federal NOL and capital loss carryforwards and
certain other tax attributes.
Limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code (or applicable state tax law) on our ability to utilize our NOL or capital loss
carryforwards or other tax attributes (whether by reason of an ownership change or otherwise) could significantly increase our future
tax liabilities, in each case reducing or eliminating the benefit of such tax attributes, which may impair the value of an investment in
our securities.
The IRS and certain states have taken the position that digital assets are “property” for income tax purposes.
In early 2014, the IRS issued basic guidance on the tax treatment of digital assets. The IRS has taken the position that a digital
asset is “property” instead of “currency” for income tax purposes. As such, general tax principles applicable to property transactions
apply to the acquisition, ownership, use, and disposition of digital assets. This overall treatment creates a potential tax liability for, and
potential tax reporting requirements applicable to, us in any circumstance where we earn or otherwise acquire, mine, own, use, or
dispose of a digital asset. In 2019, the IRS issued additional guidance specifically relating to the income tax consequences that could
arise from a digital asset hard fork event in which a new unit of digital asset may or may not be received, and released frequently
asked questions to address certain digital asset topics such as tax basis, gain, or loss on the sale or exchange of certain kinds of digital
assets and how to determine the fair market value of such digital assets.
There is no guarantee that the IRS will not alter its position with respect to the taxation of digital assets, or that legislation or
judicial determinations in the future will not result in a tax treatment of digital assets and transactions in digital assets for tax purposes
that differs from the treatment described above. You are urged to consult your own tax advisor as to the tax implications of our
acquisition, ownership, use, and disposition of digital assets. The taxation of digital assets for state, local, or non-U.S. tax purposes
may not be the same as the taxation of digital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
36
In addition, under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, as of January 1, 2018, “like-kind exchange” treatment does not apply to
digital assets. This means that gain from the sale or exchange of digital assets cannot be deferred by undertaking an exchange of one
type of virtual currency for another.
Certain states, including New York and New Jersey, generally follow IRS guidance with respect to the treatment of digital
assets for state income tax purposes, but it is unclear if other states will do so. Transactions involving digital assets for other goods and
services may also be subject to sales and use or similar taxes under barter transaction treatment or otherwise. The treatment of digital
assets for state income tax and sales tax purposes may have negative consequences, including the imposition of a greater tax burden on
investors in digital assets or a higher cost with respect to the acquisition, ownership, use, and disposition of digital assets generally. In
either case, this could have a negative effect on prices in the relevant digital asset exchange market and could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Non-U.S. jurisdictions may also elect to treat digital assets in a manner that results in adverse tax consequences. To the extent a
non-U.S. jurisdiction with a significant share of the market of digital asset owners or users imposes onerous tax burdens on such
owners or users, or imposes sales, use, or value added tax on acquisitions and dispositions of digital assets for fiat currency, such
actions could result in decreased demand for digital assets in such jurisdiction, which could impact the price of digital assets and have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Changes to, or changes to interpretations of, the U.S. federal, state, local or other jurisdictional tax laws could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
All statements contained herein concerning U.S. federal income tax (or other tax) consequences are based on existing law and
interpretations thereof. The tax regimes to which we are subject or under which we operate, including income and non-income taxes,
are unsettled and may be subject to significant change. While some of these changes could be beneficial, others could negatively affect
our after-tax returns. In the future, the currently anticipated tax treatment may be modified by legislative, judicial or administrative
changes, possibly with retroactive effect. In addition, a tax authority or court may not agree with any particular interpretation of the
relevant laws.
State, local or other jurisdictions could impose, levy or otherwise enforce tax laws against us. Tax laws and regulations at the
state and local levels frequently change, especially in relation to the interpretation of existing tax laws for new and emerging
industries, and we cannot always reasonably predict the impact from, or the ultimate cost of compliance with, current or future taxes,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Securities
An investment in our securities is highly speculative. The trading price of our securities may be volatile, and you could lose
all or part of your investment.
The trading price of our securities is likely to be volatile and could be subject to fluctuations in response to various factors,
some of which are beyond our control. These fluctuations could cause you to lose all or part of your investment in our securities as
you might be unable to sell your shares at or above the price you paid for those shares. Factors that could cause fluctuations in the
trading price of our securities include the following:
•price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;
•volatility in the trading prices and trading volumes of technology stocks;
•volatility in the price of bitcoin and other digital assets;
•changes in operating performance and stock market valuations of other technology companies generally, or those in our
industry in particular;
•sales of shares of our securities by us or our stockholders;
•failure of securities analysts to maintain coverage of us, changes in financial estimates by securities analysts who follow our
company, or our failure to meet these estimates or the expectations of investors;
•the financial projections we may provide to the public, any changes in those projections, or our failure to meet those
projections;
•announcements by us or our competitors of new products, features, or services;
37
•the public’s reaction to our press releases, other public announcements and filings with the SEC;
•rumors and market speculation involving us or other companies in our industry;
•actual or anticipated changes in our results of operations or fluctuations in our results of operations;
•actual or anticipated developments in our business, our competitors’ businesses or the competitive landscape generally;
•litigation involving us, our industry, or both, or investigations by regulators into our operations or those of our competitors;
•developments or disputes concerning our intellectual property or other proprietary rights;
•announced or completed acquisitions of businesses, products, services or technologies by us or our competitors;
•new laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations applicable to our business;
•changes in accounting standards, policies, guidelines, interpretations or principles;
•any significant change in our management; and
•general economic conditions and slow or negative growth of our markets.
In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and in the market price of a particular company’s
securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. This litigation, if instituted against us,
could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.
Future sales and issuances of our capital stock or rights to purchase capital stock could result in additional dilution of the
percentage ownership of our stockholders and could cause our stock price to decline.
We may issue additional securities from time to time, including shares of common stock as a result of the exercise or vesting, as
applicable, of options or restricted stock units (“RSUs”). In addition, we may choose to issue shares of common stock pursuant to the
CVRs. Future sales and issuances of our capital stock or rights to purchase our capital stock could result in substantial dilution to our
existing stockholders. We may issue and sell common stock, convertible securities, warrants and other equity securities in one or more
transactions at prices and in a manner as we may determine from time to time. If we sell any such securities in subsequent
transactions, investors may be materially diluted. New investors in such subsequent transactions could gain rights, preferences and
privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock.
The market price and trading volume of our securities could decline if securities or industry analysts do not publish research
or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business.
The trading market for our securities will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish
about us or our business. The analysts’ estimates are based upon their own opinions and are often different from our estimates or
expectations. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our securities or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about
our business, the price of our securities would likely decline. If few securities analysts commence coverage of us, or if one or more of
these analysts cease coverage of us or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our securities could decrease, which might
cause the price and trading volume of our securities to decline.
We do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.
We have never declared nor paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings to
finance the operation and expansion of our business, and we do not expect to declare or pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.
As a result, stockholders must rely on sales of their securities after price appreciation as the only way to realize any future gains on
their investment.
Risks Related to our Restructuring
Our actual financial results after emergence from bankruptcy may not be comparable to our projections filed with the
Bankruptcy Court or otherwise made public in the course of the Chapter 11 Cases.
In connection with the Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization that we filed with the Bankruptcy Court and the
hearing to consider confirmation of our Plan of Reorganization (as well as in certain other filings), we prepared projected financial
information for various reasons, including to demonstrate to the Bankruptcy Court the feasibility of the Plan of Reorganization and our
38
ability to continue operations upon our emergence from Chapter 11. Those projections were prepared solely for the purposes stated
therein and have not been, and will not be, updated on an ongoing basis and should not be relied upon by investors. At the time they
were prepared, the projections reflected numerous assumptions concerning our anticipated future performance with respect to then
prevailing and anticipated market and economic conditions that were and remain beyond our control and that may not materialize.
Projections are inherently subject to substantial and numerous uncertainties and to a wide variety of significant business, economic
and competitive risks and the assumptions underlying the projections or valuation estimates may prove to be wrong in material
respects. Actual results may vary significantly from those contemplated by the projections. As a result, investors should not rely on
those projections.
The ability to attract and retain key personnel is critical to the success of our business and may be affected by our emergence
from bankruptcy.
The success of our business depends on key personnel. The ability to attract and retain these key personnel may be affected by
our emergence from bankruptcy, the uncertainties currently facing the business and changes we may make to the organizational
structure to adjust to changing circumstances. Any potential delays in adopting our management incentive plan and other executive
benefits and compensation may make it difficult to retain key personnel and we may need to enter into retention or other arrangements
that could be costly to maintain. If executives, managers or other key personnel resign, retire or are terminated, or their service is
otherwise interrupted, we may not be able to replace them in a timely manner and we could experience significant declines in
productivity.
Risks Related to the Price of Bitcoin
Digital assets, and bitcoin in particular, are subject to price volatility. The value of bitcoin is dependent on a number of
factors, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2025, digital asset prices experienced a significant drop, with bitcoin prices falling over 30%
from its highs and certain other digital assets experiencing larger price declines. These price declines and volatility may lead to
disruptions in the digital asset markets and financial difficulties for industry participants, including digital asset trading platforms,
hedge funds and lending platforms. We currently generate almost all of our revenue from bitcoin rewards that we earn through self-
mining in our facilities. Investing in bitcoin and other digital assets is speculative. Bitcoin and other digital assets have historically
experienced significant intraday and long-term price volatility, significantly impacted by momentum pricing. Momentum pricing
typically is associated with growth stocks and other assets whose valuation, as determined by the investing public, accounts for
anticipated future appreciation in value. We believe that momentum pricing may have resulted, and may continue to result, in
significant and rampant speculation regarding future appreciation (or depreciation) in the value of digital assets, inflating and making
their market prices more volatile. In addition, there is currently growing but limited acceptance of digital assets in the retail and
commercial marketplace, as compared to the demand generated by investors seeking a long-term value retention or by speculators
seeking to profit from the short- or long-term holding of such digital assets, which may contribute to their levels of price volatility.
We believe the value of digital assets related to our business is dependent on a number of factors, including, but not limited to:
•global digital asset supply;
•global digital asset demand, which can be influenced by the growth of retail merchants’ and commercial businesses’
acceptance of digital assets as payment for goods and services, the security of online digital asset exchanges and digital
wallets that hold digital assets, the perception that the use and holding of digital assets is safe and secure, transaction fees, and
the regulatory restrictions on their use;
•investors’ expectations with respect to the rate of inflation of fiat currencies;
•investors’ expectations with respect to the rate of deflation of digital assets;
•cyber theft of digital assets from online wallet providers, or news of such theft from such providers or from individuals’
online wallets;
•the availability and popularity of businesses that provide digital asset-related services;
•fees associated with processing a digital asset transaction;
•changes in the software, software requirements or hardware requirements underlying digital assets;
•changes in the rights, obligations, incentives, or rewards for the various participants in digital asset mining;
39
•interest rates;
•currency exchange rates, including the rates at which digital assets may be exchanged for fiat currencies;
•fiat currency withdrawal and deposit policies on digital asset exchanges and liquidity on such exchanges;
•interruptions in service or failures of major digital asset exchanges;
•investment and trading activities of large investors and holders, including private and registered funds, that may directly or
indirectly invest in or hold digital assets;
•momentum pricing;
•monetary policies of governments, trade restrictions, currency devaluations and revaluations;
•regulatory measures, if any, that affect the use of digital assets, restrict digital assets as a form of payment, or limit the
purchase of digital assets;
•global or regional political, economic or financial events and conditions;
•expectations that the value of digital assets will change in the near or long term. A decrease in the price of a single digital
asset may cause volatility in the entire digital asset industry and may affect other digital assets. For example, a security
breach that affects investor or user confidence in bitcoin, Ethereum, litecoin or another digital asset may affect the industry as
a whole and may also cause the price of other digital assets to fluctuate; or
•with respect to bitcoin, increased competition from other forms of digital assets or payments services.
Even if shareholders are able to hold their securities for the long-term, their securities may never generate a profit, since digital
asset markets have historically experienced extended periods of flat or declining prices, in addition to sharp fluctuations. Investors
should be aware that bitcoin and other digital assets may not maintain their long-term value in terms of future purchasing power and
that the acceptance of digital asset payments by mainstream retail merchants and commercial businesses may not continue to grow. If
the price of bitcoin or other digital assets declines, our profitability will decline.
The “halving” of rewards available on the Bitcoin network, or the reduction of rewards on other networks, has had and in
the future could have a negative impact on our ability to generate revenue as our customers may not have an adequate incentive to
continue mining and customers may cease mining operations altogether, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Under the current protocols governing the Bitcoin network, the reward for validating a new block on that network is cut in half
from time to time, which has been referred to in our industry as the “halving.” When the Bitcoin network was first launched, the
reward for validating a new block was 50 bitcoin. In 2012, the reward for validating a new block was reduced to 25 bitcoin. In July
2016, the reward for validating a new block was reduced to 12.5 bitcoin, and in May 2020, the reward was further reduced to 6.25
bitcoin. In April 2024, the Bitcoin protocol executed its fourth planned halving, wherein the bitcoin rewards issued for each solved
block declined from 6.25 bitcoin to 3.125 bitcoin. The next halving for the bitcoin blockchain is anticipated to occur sometime in
2028. In addition, other networks may operate under rules that, or may alter their rules to, limit the distribution of new digital assets.
We, and to our knowledge, our potential hosting customers, currently rely on these rewards to generate a significant portion of our
total revenue. If the award of digital assets for solving blocks and transaction fees are not sufficiently high, neither we nor our
customers may have an adequate incentive to continue mining and may cease mining operations altogether, which as a result may
significantly reduce demand for our hosting services. As a result, the halving of available rewards on the Bitcoin network, or any
reduction of rewards on other networks, would have a negative impact on our revenues and may have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
If the award of bitcoin and/or transaction fees for solving blocks is not sufficiently high to incentivize transaction
processors, such processors may reduce or cease expending processing power on a particular network, which could negatively
impact the utility of the network, reduce the value of its bitcoin and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
As the number of bitcoin rewarded to transaction processors for validating blocks in the Bitcoin network decreases, the
incentive for transaction processors to continue contributing processing power to the network may shift toward transaction fees. Such
a shift may increase the transaction fees on a network. Higher transaction fees may reduce the utility of a network for an end user,
which may cause end users to reduce or stop their use of that network. Existing users may be motivated to switch from one digital
asset to another or back to fiat currency. In such case, the price of the relevant digital asset may decline substantially and could go to
40
zero. Such reduced price and demand for, and use of, the relevant digital asset and network, either as it applies to our mining services
or to those of our potential hosting customers, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
To the extent that the profit margins of digital asset mining operations are not high, mining participants are more likely to
sell their earned bitcoin, which could constrain bitcoin prices.
Over the past few years, digital asset mining operations have evolved from individual users mining with computer processors,
GPUs and first-generation ASIC servers. Currently, new processing power is predominantly added by incorporated and
unincorporated “professionalized” mining operations. Professionalized mining operations may use proprietary hardware or
sophisticated ASIC machines acquired from ASIC manufacturers. They require the investment of significant capital to acquire this
hardware, to lease operating space (often in data centers or warehousing facilities), and to pay the costs of electricity and labor to
operate the mining farms. As a result, professionalized mining operations are of a greater scale than prior mining operations and have
more defined and regular expenses and liabilities. These regular expenses and liabilities require professionalized mining operations to
maintain profit margins on the sale of digital assets. To the extent the price of digital assets decline and such profit margin is
constrained, professionalized mining participants are incentivized to more immediately sell digital assets earned from mining
operations, whereas it is believed that individual mining participants in past years were more likely to hold newly mined digital assets
for more extended periods. The immediate selling of newly earned digital assets greatly increases the trading volume of the digital
assets, creating downward pressure on the market price of digital asset rewards. The extent to which the value of digital assets earned
by a professionalized mining operation exceeds the allocable capital and operating costs determines the profit margin of such
operation. A professionalized mining operation may be more likely to sell a higher percentage of its newly earned digital assets rapidly
if it is operating at a low profit margin and it may partially or completely cease operations if its profit margin is negative. In a low
profit margin environment, a higher percentage could be sold more rapidly, thereby potentially depressing digital asset prices. Lower
digital asset prices could result in further tightening of profit margins for professionalized mining operations creating a network effect
that may further reduce the price of digital assets until mining operations with higher operating costs become unprofitable forcing
them to reduce mining power or cease mining operations temporarily. Such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our
business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of bitcoin and any other digital assets we earn through self-mining or
otherwise acquire or hold for our own account.
Mining requires the investment of significant capital for the acquisition of hardware, leasing or purchasing space, involves
substantial electricity costs and requires the employment of personnel to operate the data facilities, which may lead mining operators
to liquidate their positions in digital assets to fund these capital requirements. In addition, if the reward of new digital assets for mining
declines, and/or if transaction fees are not sufficiently high, profit margins for mining operators may be reduced, and such operators
may be more likely to sell a higher percentage of their digital assets.
Whereas it is believed that individual operators in past years were more likely to hold digital assets for more extended periods,
the immediate selling of newly transacted digital assets by operators may increase the supply of such digital assets on the applicable
exchange market, which could create downward pressure on the price of the digital assets and, in turn, could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The cash needs of our high-density colocation growth initiatives will limit the amount of digital assets we hold, thus
preventing us from recognizing any gain from the appreciation in value of the digital assets we have sold and may sell in the
future.
We are no longer required to sell our digital assets, including bitcoin, as we receive them under our existing debt agreements.
However, the significant cash required by our expected high-density colocation growth initiatives will require us to sell the digital
assets we earn periodically as cash needs and our treasury management policies dictate. When we sell a digital asset, we are unable to
benefit from any future appreciation in the underlying value of that digital asset.
Consequently, our bitcoin may be sold at a time when the price is lower than it otherwise might be in the future, which could
reduce the gain we might have realized on the sale of that digital asset at a different time.
Risks Related to Digital Assets
Digital asset exchanges and other trading venues are relatively new and, in some cases, unregulated and some have
experienced fraud and failure.
41
To the extent that digital asset exchanges or other trading venues are involved in fraud or experience security failures or other
operational issues, a reduction in digital asset prices could occur. Digital asset market prices depend, directly or indirectly, on the
prices set on exchanges and other trading venues, which are new and, in most cases, largely unregulated as compared to established,
regulated exchanges for securities, derivatives and other currencies. For example, during the past three years, a number of bitcoin
exchanges have been closed due to fraud, business failure or security breaches. In many of these instances, the customers of the closed
bitcoin exchanges were not compensated or made whole for the partial or complete losses of their account balances in such bitcoin
exchanges. While smaller exchanges are less likely to have the infrastructure and capitalization that provide larger exchanges with
additional stability, larger exchanges may be more likely to be appealing targets for hackers and “malware” (i.e., software used or
programmed by attackers to disrupt computer operation, gather sensitive information, or gain access to private computer systems) and
may be more likely to be targets of regulatory enforcement action.
Many digital asset exchanges currently do not provide the public with significant information regarding their ownership
structure, management teams, corporate practices or regulatory compliance. As a result, the marketplace may lose confidence in, or
may experience problems relating to, digital asset exchanges, which may cause the price of bitcoin to decline. For example, in the first
half of 2022, each of Celsius Mining, LLC, Voyager Digital Ltd., and Three Arrows Capital Ltd. declared bankruptcy, resulting in a
loss of confidence among participants in the digital asset ecosystem and negative publicity surrounding digital assets more broadly. In
November 2022, BlockFi Inc. and FTX Trading Ltd (“FTX”), the third largest digital asset exchange by volume at the time, halted
customer withdrawals, and, shortly thereafter, FTX and its subsidiaries filed for bankruptcy. Most recently, in January 2023, Genesis
Global Holdco. LLC and certain affiliates filed for bankruptcy.
In response to these events, the digital asset markets, including the market for bitcoin specifically, have experienced price
volatility and several other entities in the digital asset industry have been, and may continue to be, negatively affected, further
undermining confidence in the digital asset market and in bitcoin. These events have also negatively impacted the liquidity of the
digital asset market as certain entities affiliated with FTX engaged in significant trading activity. If the liquidity of the digital asset
market continues to be negatively impacted by these events, digital asset prices, including the price of bitcoin, may continue to
experience significant volatility and confidence in the digital asset markets may be further undermined. A perceived lack of stability in
the digital asset exchange market and the closure or temporary shutdown of digital asset exchanges due to business failure, hackers or
malware, government-mandated regulation, or fraud, may reduce confidence at least in part in digital asset networks and result in
greater volatility in bitcoin’s value. Because the value of bitcoin is derived from the continued willingness of market participants to
exchange government-issued currency that is designated as legal tender in its country of issuance through government decree,
regulation, or law (“fiat” currency) for bitcoin, should the marketplace for bitcoin be jeopardized or disappear entirely, permanent and
total loss of the value of bitcoin may result.
Digital asset transactions are irrevocable and, if incorrectly transferred, digital assets may be irretrievable. As a result, any
incorrectly executed digital asset transactions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Typically, digital asset transactions are not, from an administrative perspective, reversible without the consent and active
participation of the recipient of the transaction or, in theory, control or consent of a majority of the processing power on the applicable
network. Once a transaction has been confirmed and verified in a block that is added to the network blockchain, an incorrect transfer
of a digital asset or a theft of a digital asset generally will not be reversible and we may not be capable of seeking compensation for
any such transfer or theft. Although transfers of any digital assets we hold will not regularly be made to or from vendors, consultants,
services providers, etc., it is possible that, through computer or human error, or through theft or criminal action, digital assets held by
us could be transferred from us in incorrect amounts or to unauthorized third parties. To the extent that we are unable to seek a
corrective transaction with such third party or are incapable of identifying the third party that has received our digital assets through
error or theft, we will be unable to revert or otherwise recover our incorrectly transferred digital assets. To the extent that we are
unable to seek redress for such error or theft, such loss could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
We may not have adequate sources of recovery if the bitcoin held by us are lost, stolen or destroyed due to third-party digital
asset services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Certain digital assets held by us are stored using Coinbase Global, Inc. (“Coinbase”), a third-party digital asset service. We
believe that the security procedures that Coinbase utilizes, such as dual authentication security, secured facilities, segregated accounts
and cold storage, are reasonably designed to safeguard our bitcoin and other digital assets from theft, loss, destruction or other issues
relating to hackers and technological attack. Nevertheless, the security procedures cannot guarantee the prevention of any loss due to a
security breach, software defect or act of God that may be borne by us. In addition, Coinbase’s limited liability under its services
42
agreement with us may limit our ability to recover losses relating to our bitcoin. If such digital assets are lost, stolen or destroyed
under circumstances rendering a third party liable to us, it is possible that the responsible third party may not have the financial
resources or insurance sufficient to satisfy any or all of our claims against the third party, or have the ability to retrieve, restore or
replace the lost, stolen or destroyed digital assets due to governing network protocols and the strength of the cryptographic systems
associated with such digital assets. To the extent that we are unable to recover on any of our claims against any such third party, such
loss could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Any loss or destruction of a private key required to access a digital asset is irreversible. Loss of access to digital assets may
be permanent.
Digital assets are each accessible and controllable only by the possessor of both the unique public key and private key
associated with the digital asset. Although we utilize the services of third-party holders of digital assets and sell digital assets as soon
as practicable after receiving them, it is possible that digital assets in our possession can be lost or stolen and irretrievable which could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The digital assets held by us are not subject to FDIC or SIPC protections.
We do not hold our digital assets with a banking institution or a member of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(“FDIC”) or the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”), and to date, neither the FDIC nor the SIPC has extended any
such protections to depositors of digital assets. Accordingly, our digital assets are not subject to the protections by FDIC or SIPC
member institutions and any loss of our digital assets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Digital assets, including bitcoin, face significant scaling obstacles that can lead to high fees or slow transaction settlement
times and any mechanisms of increasing the scale of digital asset settlement may significantly alter the competitive dynamics in the
market.
Digital assets face significant obstacles scaling transaction throughput, including high fees or slow transaction settlement times,
and attempts to increase the volume of transactions may not be effective. Scaling digital asset transaction volumes, and particularly
bitcoin, is essential to the widespread acceptance of digital assets as a means of payment, which is necessary to the growth and
development of our business.
Many digital asset networks face significant scaling challenges. For example, digital assets are limited with respect to how
many transactions can occur per second. In this respect, bitcoin may be particularly affected as it relies on the “proof-of-work”
validation, which due to its inherent characteristics may be particularly hard to scale to allow simultaneous processing of multiple
daily transactions by users. Participants in the digital asset ecosystem debate potential approaches to increasing the average number of
transactions per second that the network can handle and have implemented mechanisms or are researching ways to increase scale, such
as “sharding,” which is a term for a horizontal partition of data in a database or search engine, which would not require every single
transaction to be included in every single miner’s or validator’s block.
There is no guarantee that any of the mechanisms in place or being explored for increasing the scale of settlement of digital
asset transactions will be effective, how long they will take to become effective or whether such mechanisms will be effective for all
digital assets. There is also a risk that any mechanisms of increasing the scale of digital asset settlements, such as the ongoing
upgrades as part of Ethereum 2.0, may significantly alter the competitive dynamics in the digital asset market and may adversely affect
the value of bitcoin and the price of our securities. Any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects,
financial condition, and operating results.
Latency in confirming transactions on a network could result in a loss of confidence in the network, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Latency in confirming transactions on a network can be caused by a number of factors, such as transaction processors ceasing
to support the network and/or supporting a different network. To the extent that any transaction processors cease to record transactions
on a network, such transactions will not be recorded on the blockchain of the network until a block is solved by a transaction processor
that does not require the payment of transaction fees or other incentives. Currently, there are no known incentives for transaction
processors to elect to exclude the recording of transactions in solved blocks. However, to the extent that any such incentives arise (for
example, with respect to bitcoin, a collective movement among transaction processors or one or more mining pools forcing bitcoin
users to pay transaction fees as a substitute for, or in addition to, the award of new bitcoin upon the solving of a block), transaction
43
processors could delay the recording and verification of a significant number of transactions on a network’s blockchain. If such
latency became systemic, and sustained, it could result in greater exposure to double-spending transactions and a loss of confidence in
the applicable network, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, increasing growth and popularity of digital assets, ICOs and security token offerings, as well as non-digital asset
related applications that utilize blockchain technology on certain networks, can cause congestion and backlog, and as result, increase
latency on such networks. An increase in congestion and backlogs could result in longer transaction confirmation times, an increase in
unconfirmed transactions (that is, transactions that have yet to be included in a block on a network and therefore are not yet completed
transactions), higher transaction fees and an overall decrease in confidence in a particular network, which could ultimately affect our
ability to transact on that particular network and, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Malicious actors or botnet may obtain control of more than 50% of the processing power on the bitcoin or other network.
If a malicious actor or botnet (a volunteer or hacked collection of computers controlled by networked software coordinating the
actions of the computers) obtains a majority of the processing power dedicated to mining on the bitcoin or other network, it may be
able to alter the blockchain on which the bitcoin or other network and most bitcoin or other digital asset transactions rely by
constructing fraudulent blocks or preventing certain transactions from completing in a timely manner, or at all. The malicious actor or
botnet could control, exclude, or modify the ordering of transactions, though it could not generate new bitcoin or digital assets or
transactions using such control. The malicious actor could “double-spend” its own bitcoin or digital assets (i.e., spend the same bitcoin
or digital assets in more than one transaction) and prevent the confirmation of other users’ transactions for so long as it maintained
control. To the extent that such malicious actor or botnet did not yield its control of the processing power on the bitcoin or other
network, or the bitcoin or other community did not reject the fraudulent blocks as malicious, reversing any changes made to the
blockchain may not be possible.
Although there are no known reports of malicious activity or control of the bitcoin blockchain achieved through controlling
over 50% of the processing power on the network, it is believed that certain mining pools may have exceeded the 50% threshold. The
possible crossing of the 50% threshold indicates a greater risk in that a single mining pool could exert authority over the validation of
bitcoin transactions. To the extent that the Bitcoin or other digital asset ecosystems, including developers and administrators of mining
pools, do not act to ensure greater decentralization of bitcoin or other digital asset mining processing power, the feasibility of a
malicious actor obtaining control of the processing power on the bitcoin or other network will increase, which may adversely affect an
investment in us.
Intellectual property rights claims may adversely affect the operation of any or all networks.
Third parties may assert intellectual property rights claims relating to the operation of digital assets and the holding and transfer
of such assets. Regardless of the merit of any intellectual property rights claims or other legal action, any threatened action that
reduces confidence in the long-term viability of any or all of the networks or other similar peer-to-peer networks, or in the ability of
end-users to hold and transfer digital assets, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations. Additionally, a meritorious intellectual property rights claim could prevent us and other end-users from holding or
transferring the digital assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A soft or hard fork on a network could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
The rules governing a network’s protocol are subject to constant change and, at any given time, there may be different groups
of developers that can modify a network’s protocol. As network protocols are not sold and their use does not generate revenues for
their development teams, the core developers are generally not compensated for maintaining and updating the network protocols.
Consequently, there may be a lack of financial incentive for developers to maintain or develop networks and the core developers may
lack the resources to adequately address emerging issues with network protocols. Although the bitcoin and other leading networks are
currently supported by core developers, such support may not continue or be sufficient in the future. To the extent that material issues
arise with Bitcoin or another network and the core developers and open-source contributors are unable to address the issues adequately
or in a timely manner, the networks may be adversely affected.
Any individual can download the applicable network software and make any desired modifications that alter the protocols and
software of the network, which are proposed to developers, users and transaction processors on the applicable network through
software downloads and upgrades, typically posted to development forums such as GitHub.com. Such proposed modifications can be
44
agreed upon, developed, adopted and implemented by a substantial majority of transaction processors, which, in such event, results in
a “soft fork” or “hard fork” on the relevant network. A “soft fork” occurs when an updated version of the validating protocol is still
“backwards compatible” with previous versions of the protocol. As a result, non-upgraded network participants with an older version
of the validating protocol will still recognize new blocks or transactions and may be able to confirm and validate a transaction;
however, the functionality of the non-upgraded network participant may be limited. Thus, non-upgraded network participants are
incentivized to adopt the updated version of the protocol. The occurrence of a soft fork could potentially destabilize mining and
increase transaction and development costs and decrease trustworthiness of a network.
A “hard fork” occurs when the updated version of the validating protocol is not “backwards compatible” with previous versions
of the protocol, and therefore, requires forward adoption by network participants in order to recognize new blocks, validate and verify
transactions and maintain consensus on the relevant blockchain. Since the updated version of the protocol is not backwards
compatible, a hard fork can cause the relevant blockchain to permanently diverge into two separate blockchains on a network. For
example, in the case of bitcoin, a hard fork created two new digital assets: Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Gold. The value of a newly
created digital asset from a hard fork (“forked digital asset”) may or may not have value in the long-run and may affect the price of
other digital assets if interest and resources are shifted away from previously existing digital assets to the forked digital asset. The
value of a previously existing digital asset after a hard fork is subject to many factors, including the market reaction and value of the
forked digital asset and the occurrence of other soft or hard forks in the future. As such, the value of certain digital assets could be
materially reduced if existing and future hard forks have a negative effect on their value.
If a soft fork or hard fork occurs on a network, which we or our hosting customers are processing transactions or hold digital
assets in, we may be required to upgrade our hardware or software in order to continue our mining operations, and we may not be able
to make such upgrades. A soft fork or hard fork in a particular digital asset that we process could have a negative effect on the value of
that digital asset and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
To the extent that any miners cease to record transactions in solved blocks, transactions that do not include the payment of a
transaction fee will not be recorded on the blockchain until a block is solved by a miner who does not require the payment of
transaction fees. Any widespread delays in the recording of transactions could result in a loss of confidence in that digital asset
network, which could adversely impact an investment in us.
To the extent that any miners cease to record transactions in solved blocks, such transactions will not be recorded on the
blockchain. Currently, there are no known incentives for miners to elect to exclude the recording of transactions in solved blocks;
however, to the extent that any such incentives arise (e.g., a collective movement among miners or one or more mining pools forcing
bitcoin users to pay transaction fees as a substitute for or in addition to the award of new bitcoins upon the solving of a block), actions
of miners solving a significant number of blocks could delay the recording and confirmation of transactions on the blockchain.
Any systemic delays in the recording and confirmation of transactions on the blockchain could result in greater exposure to
double-spending transactions and a loss of confidence in certain or all digital asset networks, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 1C. Cybersecurity.
Risk Management and Strategy
of operations. We have implemented a risk-based approach, guided by Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 199, to
Accordingly, security incidents are, as appropriate to the risk and circumstances, evaluated, classified by severity and prioritized for
response, mitigation and/or remediation. At a high level, our incident response framework consists of five elements: (1) identifying
and managing cybersecurity risks to our systems, assets, data, and other capabilities; (2) implementing safeguards designed to timely
deliver business services; (3) implementing systems and processes designed to detect the occurrence of cybersecurity events; (4)
responding to security events systematically; and (5) utilizing mechanisms designed to enable disaster recovery and business
45
Our cybersecurity program considers industry standards and practices, such as measures in the National Institute of Standards
and Technology (“NIST”) Cybersecurity Framework. Our cybersecurity program develops pragmatic strategies designed to preserve
the confidentiality, integrity and availability of Company and customer information. Pursuant to this approach, we have implemented
including a written incident response plan and cybersecurity insurance, to manage and mitigate such risk. Those tools and
methodologies are periodically evaluated. Depending on the environments, we monitor and evaluate our cybersecurity posture and
performance through vulnerability scans, penetration tests and threat intelligence feeds. Depending on the environment, we may
conduct red team programming designed to stress test the functioning of our information security systems and assist in identifying
areas of potential vulnerability. Based on the results of these exercises, we attempt to harden any identified exposure points and adjust
our security processes to ensure dynamism and responsiveness.
responding to cybersecurity risks. Third parties may be engaged to assist with procedures including red and blue team training
exercises and penetration testing. As appropriate to the circumstance, we require third-party service providers with access to important
personal, confidential or proprietary information to implement and maintain cybersecurity practices consistent with applicable legal
standards and industry practices.
Our business depends on the availability, reliability, and security of our information systems, networks, data, and intellectual
property. To date, we have not identified any risks from cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any previous cybersecurity
For more information on the risks from cybersecurity threats that may materially affect us and how they may do so, refer to Part I,
Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including but not limited to the risk factor titled, “If our information
technology systems or those of the third parties with whom we work or our data, are or were compromised, we could experience
adverse consequences resulting from such compromise, including but not limited to regulatory investigations or actions; litigations;
fines and penalties; disruptions of our business operations; reputational harm; loss of revenue or profits; and other adverse
consequences.”
Governance
are spearheaded by professionals that collectively hold decades of cybersecurity leadership experience across multiple industries,
rapidly-evolving cybersecurity landscape. To disseminate our top-level strategy throughout the Company, our information security
team provides hands-on and often role-specific training and awareness programs to our employees. Our employees with network
access participate annually in required training, including spear phishing and other awareness training. We also periodically conduct
simulated phishing exercises to practice appropriate response and augment employee awareness of established and emerging cyber
threats.
Our Board of Directors considers cybersecurity risk and mitigation as a critical component of its risk oversight function and continues
to further develop specific cybersecurity oversight functions and protocols as we have improved our standing and continue to do so to
meet the reality of the threat climate. Our Board of Directors administers this oversight function directly through the Board of
assessing strategic risk exposure and our Audit Committee has the responsibility to consider and discuss our major financial risk
exposures, including risks from cybersecurity threats, and the steps our management has taken to monitor and control these exposures,
including guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and management is undertaken. The Audit
Committee also monitors compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and is charged with oversight of the adequacy of
Company’s insurance programs, including cyber insurance.
Item 2. Properties.
Our corporate headquarters is located at 838 Walker Road, Suite 21-2105, Dover, Delaware 19904, and we also maintain leased
office space in Texas and Florida. Our data center facilities include leased sites in Alabama, North Dakota, and Texas and owned sites
in Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, and Oklahoma. We believe our facilities are suitable and adequate for our current operations.
46
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
We are involved in lawsuits, claims and other legal matters that arise in the ordinary course of business. The outcome of these
matters cannot be predicted with certainty; however, we believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. To the extent that the ultimate resolution of
any matter differs from our current estimates reflected in the recorded reserves, we could incur additional charges that could be
significant. Information regarding our material pending legal proceedings is included in Note 11 — Commitments and Contingencies,
to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
47
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Market Information
Our common stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “CORZ.” Our publicly traded warrants trade
under the symbols “CORZW” and “CORZZ.”
Holders
On February 26, 2026, there were 437 holders of record of our common stock, 143 holders of record of our CORZW Warrants,
and 139 holders of record of our CORZZ Warrants. Because many shares are held in “street name,” the actual number of beneficial
owners is substantially greater.
Dividends
We have not paid dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The
Board of Directors currently intends to retain all available earnings for use in our business.
Stock Performance Graph
The following performance graph compares the cumulative total return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of
the Nasdaq Composite Index and Russell 2000 Index from January 24, 2024 (the date our common stock began trading on the Nasdaq
Global Select Market) through December 31, 2025. The comparison assumes an investment of $100 in our common stock and in each
index on January 24, 2024 and that dividends, if any, were reinvested. The performance shown is based on historical results and is not
necessarily indicative of future performance.
This performance graph shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in
such filing.
48
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
Below are the sales of unregistered securities during the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, other than those
previously reported in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or in a Current Report on Form 8-K.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2025, we issued approximately 0.7 million shares of common stock upon the exercise
of Tranche 1 Warrants and approximately 2.9 million shares of common stock upon the exercise of Tranche 2 Warrants, in each case
in reliance on the exemption provided by Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code. We received cash proceeds of approximately
$5.1 million from the Tranche 1 Warrant exercises, and cash proceeds from the Tranche 2 Warrant exercises were immaterial.
Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities
Not applicable.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
We had no purchases of our equity securities for the three months ended December 31, 2025.
Item 6. [Reserved]
49
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this section to “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” “Core Scientific,”
or “Core” refer to Core Scientific, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is
intended to promote understanding of the results of operations and financial condition. This MD&A is provided as a supplement to,
and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
(Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K). This section generally discusses the results of operations for 2025 compared to 2024. For
discussion related to the results of operations and changes in consolidated financial condition for 2024 compared to 2023 refer to
Part II, Item 7. — “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our fiscal year 2024
Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on February 20, 2025.
Unless otherwise indicated, references to “2025” and “2024” in this MD&A refer to the years ended December 31, 2025
and 2024, respectively.
As described in Note 3 — Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 to the consolidated
financial statements included in this Annual Report, during the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2025, the Company identified errors in its previously issued consolidated financial statements related to the accounting
for property, plant and equipment demolished in connection with the conversion of certain facilities from digital asset mining
operations to high-density colocation infrastructure. The Company is concurrently filing an amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2024 and amended Quarterly Reports on Forms 10-Q/A for the quarterly periods ended March 31,
2025, June 30, 2025, and September 30, 2025. The discussion that follows presents 2024 comparative data on an as-restated basis.
As discussed in the section titled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” the following discussion and
analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they never
materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those identified below, and those
discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors” under Part I, Item 1A in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
Core Scientific, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” “Core Scientific,” or “Core”) designs, builds and operates large-scale
purpose-built data centers that support high-density colocation services and digital asset mining for both our own account and to a
lesser extent, third-party customers. Our data centers are optimized for power-intensive, mission-critical computing workloads, with a
focus on artificial intelligence (“AI”) and other high-performance computing (“HPC”) applications.
In 2024, the Company announced its first high-density colocation contract with CoreWeave, Inc. (“CoreWeave), a provider of
high-performance computing (“HPC”) services, which subsequently had been expanded to 590 megawatts (“MW”) of leased customer
power capacity over the exercise of several contractual options. We believe leveraging our existing infrastructure for high-density
colocation services will provide more stable and predictable revenue streams, and represents substantially less risk over time than our
traditional hosted bitcoin mining or self-mining operations.
We are constructing, refurbishing, reallocating or converting our ten facilities in Alabama (1), Georgia (2), Kentucky (1), North
Carolina (1), North Dakota (1), Oklahoma (1), and Texas (3) to support artificial intelligence related workloads, in support of our
existing colocation customer, but also to support our commitment to meeting the growing demand for high-density colocation
solutions and diversifying our customer base. This will be done as circumstances allow and in a manner designed to retain access to
electrical power under our control, maximize the value of our digital asset mining equipment to third parties, and fulfill existing
obligations to suppliers and customers. We intend to convert every megawatt in our portfolio to high-density colocation infrastructure
over the next three years. In addition to converting our existing portfolio, we are actively pursuing the acquisition of new sites,
including land and power capacity, to expand our data center footprint beyond our current facilities.
Currently, the vast majority of our revenue is from mining bitcoin for our own account (“self-mining”). We will continue to
mine digital assets and manage our self-mining fleet with a focus on power expense coverage and cash generation while we convert
our data centers for alternative high-density colocation service business opportunities. We expect to increase revenue derived from
high-density colocation (“HDC”) services as capacity gets delivered to our current end customer as well as when we sign and begin
generating revenue from new colocation customers.
50
As of December 31, 2025, we operated a diversified portfolio of ten data centers across seven U.S. states, representing
approximately 1.4 gigawatts (“GW”) of gross utility power capacity, or approximately 920 megawatts (“MW”) of total leasable
customer power capacity. We continue to be in active discussions with both our existing and future potential utility providers
regarding additional power allocations.
During 2025, total revenue decreased to $319.0 million from $510.7 million, primarily due to lower digital asset self-mining
revenue and digital asset hosted mining revenue as we shifted capital and infrastructure toward colocation, partially offset by higher
colocation revenue from incremental billable customer power capacity. Operating loss increased to $245.6 million in 2025 from
$142.1 million in 2024. Net loss was $288.6 million in 2025 and included significant non-cash items, including changes of $33.1
million in the fair value of warrants and contingent value rights. Adjusted EBITDA decreased to $29.7 million in 2025 from $157.4
million in 2024. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. See “Key Business Operating Metrics and Non-GAAP
Financial Measures” below for our definition of, and additional information related to Adjusted EBITDA.
Developments During 2025
On July 7, 2025, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with CoreWeave, Inc.
(“CoreWeave”) pursuant to which CoreWeave would acquire the Company in an all-stock transaction, subject to stockholder approval
and other customary closing conditions. On October 30, 2025, the Company terminated the Merger Agreement in accordance with its
terms following Company stockholder rejection of the terms of the Merger Agreement at a special meeting of stockholders on that
date.
The Company incurred $21.6 million of advisory, legal, and other professional or consulting fees related to the proposed
transaction which are reflected in our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2025. Other than these costs, the
termination of the Merger Agreement did not result in any termination fees and did not have a material impact on the Company’s
financial position or results of operations.
Our Business Model
Business Overview
As a large-scale owner and operator of high-power digital infrastructure, we generate revenue primarily through (i) Colocation
services (ii) Digital Asset Self‑Mining, and (iii) Digital Asset Hosted Mining services. We are in the process of reallocating significant
portions of our infrastructure and capital from bitcoin mining to HDC services for AI and HPC workloads.
We focus primarily on contracting our digital infrastructure for Colocation, mining bitcoin, and enhancing efficiencies in our
operations. In self‑mining, we earn bitcoin by operating our owned mining fleet through mining pool arrangements, and in hosted
mining and colocation we earn fees for providing infrastructure, power and related services to third parties.
Our data centers house bitcoin mining computers and will increasingly house specialized compute accelerators, including
graphics processing units (“GPUs”). These facilities leverage our specialized design and construction capabilities by employing high-
density, innovative engineering, power designs and modular construction. For digital asset mining, our proprietary thermodynamic
structural design manages heat and airflow to deliver reliable operations to us and our customers. As part of our go-forward strategy,
we are in the process of converting our entire data center portfolio to support our high-density Colocation operations for AI and HPC
workloads.
Business Strategy
Our strategy is to grow our revenue and profitability by converting and expanding our large-scale data center infrastructure
portfolio to deliver high-density colocation services for artificial intelligence and HPC workloads. We plan to develop and bring
online the infrastructure required to meet our existing contractual commitments to our high-density colocation customer, expand our
infrastructure portfolio by securing additional land and power at new and existing sites, and sign additional colocation customers to
diversify our revenue base.
Our customer strategy targets hyperscale cloud-based providers, neoclouds, and enterprises, including customers we believe
have significant data center infrastructure needs that have not yet been outsourced or will require additional data center space and
power to support their growth and their increasing reliance on technology infrastructure in their operations.
51
Segments
We have three operating segments: “Colocation,” consisting of providing high-density colocation services to customers
employing AI and HPC related workloads, “Digital Asset Self-Mining,” consisting of performing digital asset mining for our own
account, and “Digital Asset Hosted Mining,” consisting of providing hosting services to third parties for digital asset mining. Prior to
April 1, 2024, we operated primarily in the Digital Asset Self-Mining and Digital Asset Hosted Mining segments.
Our Colocation segment provides space, power, cooling, facilities operations, security and other services to third-party
customers to support workloads for machine learning and artificial intelligence.
Our Digital Asset Self-Mining operation segment generates revenue from the deployment and operation of our own large fleet
of miners within our owned digital infrastructure as part of a pool of users that process transactions conducted on one or more
blockchain networks. In exchange for this activity, we receive digital assets in the form of bitcoin.
Our Digital Asset Hosted Mining operation segment generates revenue from recurring hosting services, which are generally
priced based on power usage and other service components. Our Digital Asset Hosted Mining operation segment provides a full suite
of services to our digital asset mining customers. We provide deployment, monitoring, troubleshooting, optimization and maintenance
of our customers’ digital asset mining equipment and provide necessary electrical power, repair and other infrastructure services
necessary for our customers to operate, maintain and efficiently mine digital assets. We do not currently expect to further expand our
Digital Asset Hosted Mining operations in future years.
Mining Equipment
On July 5, 2024, we entered into an arrangement with Block, Inc. (“Block”), a technology company developing ASICs,
pursuant to which we received ASICs during 2025 and expect to receive additional ASICs during 2026. As of December 31, 2025, we
estimate approximately $64.8 million of remaining cash payments associated with this arrangement, of which approximately $36.6
million was paid upon delivery in January 2026, with the remaining balance payable on a deferred basis primarily during 2026 and
extending into early 2027.
Aside from the miners received in 2025 and those expected from Block, we do not anticipate entering into new large-scale
bitcoin mining equipment procurement agreements as we continue to shift capital allocation toward HDC infrastructure. As a result,
we expect future capital expenditures related to mining equipment to decline. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for a discussion
of our material cash requirements and expected sources of funding, including capital expenditures and commitments.
The tables below summarize the total number of self- and hosted miners in operation as of December 31, 2025 and
December 31, 2024 (miners in thousands):
Bitcoin Miners in Operation as of December 31, 2025 | |||
Mining Equipment | Hash rate (EH/s) | Number of Miners | |
Self-miners | 15.7 | 135.5 | |
Hosted miners | 2.2 | 15.9 | |
Total mining equipment | 17.9 | 151.4 | |
Bitcoin Miners in Operation as of December 31, 2024 | |||
Mining Equipment | Hash rate (EH/s) | Number of Miners | |
Self-miners | 19.1 | 164.0 | |
Hosted miners | 1.0 | 7.1 | |
Total mining equipment | 20.1 | 171.1 | |
See “Key Business Operating Metrics and Non‑GAAP Financial Measures” below for definitions and discussion of the
operating metrics management uses to evaluate our performance.
52
Key Factors Affecting Our Financial Performance
Our results of operations, liquidity and cash flows are affected by a number of factors, including (i) our ability to execute our
strategic transition toward high‑density colocation services, (ii) bitcoin market conditions and network fundamentals that drive
self‑mining economics, (iii) broader macroeconomic and regulatory developments, (iv) power prices and curtailment activity, and (v)
the competitive landscape for our industry. The factors below highlight key drivers that have affected, and may continue to affect, our
financial performance.
Our financial performance depends in part on our ability to operate our self‑mining fleet profitably and, as we transition our
business, to execute and expand our colocation operations and attract and retain colocation customers. Increases in power costs,
inability to mine digital assets efficiently and to sell digital assets at favorable prices will reduce our operating margins and could have
a material near-term adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, sustained declines in
bitcoin prices or adverse changes in network conditions could reduce cash generated from self‑mining during periods where
self‑mining remains a significant contributor to our results.
Strategic Transition to High-Density Colocation Services
As we grow our Colocation operations over the next several years by converting the remaining bitcoin mining sites and adding
new infrastructure and customers, we expect Colocation to represent a larger share of our results and gradually reduce our exposure to
bitcoin spot price volatility. The Colocation segment is characterized by the implementation of long-term contracts with customers
spanning 10+ years with terms and conditions resulting in stable, predictable revenue and cash flows over each period.
The pace of this transition, and the timing of related revenue and cash flows, depends on (i) customer deployment schedules
under existing and future contracts and (ii) the timing and cost of converting and commissioning incremental billable customer power
capacity. Conversion capital expenditures and timelines are sensitive to equipment lead times and availability, labor constraints,
permitting and interconnection sequencing, and supply chain and logistical challenges. Changes in these inputs can affect when
incremental capacity becomes billable and therefore may affect the timing of colocation revenue, cost of services and related cash
flows.
Bitcoin Market Conditions
Our Digital Asset Self-Mining segment is heavily dependent on the spot price of bitcoin. The prices of digital assets,
specifically bitcoin, have experienced substantial volatility, meaning that high or low prices may have little or no relationship to
identifiable market forces, may be subject to rapidly changing investor sentiment, and may be influenced by factors such as
technology, regulatory developments and enforcement actions. Bitcoin (as well as other digital assets) may have value based on
various factors, including their acceptance as a means of exchange by consumers and others, scarcity, and market demand. Changes in
the market price of bitcoin can materially affect (i) revenue recognized from self‑mining, (ii) the fair value of digital assets we hold
and related gains or losses recognized in our results of operations, and (iii) liquidity to the extent we sell bitcoin as part of our treasury
strategy. Bitcoin miners also receive a transaction fee in the form of a portion of bitcoin for validating transactions on the Bitcoin
network. The transaction fee can vary in value over time, with higher fees prioritizing certain transactions over those with lower fees.
An increase in Bitcoin network transaction fees increases mining proceeds.
Higher power costs, lower realized bitcoin prices, or reduced mining efficiency would reduce self-mining margins and cash
generation during periods when self-mining remains a significant contributor to our results. As we transition, the timing of colocation
conversions and customer deployments, and our ability to execute and scale colocation operations and retain colocation customers,
will increasingly influence our revenue mix and profitability.
Bitcoin Network Fundamentals
Our business is not only impacted by the volatility in digital asset prices and transaction fees, but also by increases in the
competition for digital asset production. For bitcoin, this increased competition is described as the network hash rate resulting from the
growth in the overall quantity and quality of miners working to solve blocks on the bitcoin blockchain, and the difficulty index
associated with the secure hashing algorithm employed in solving the blocks. Increases in network hash rate generally increase
network difficulty over time, which can reduce the amount of bitcoin earned for a given level of deployed hash rate and power
consumption.
53
Increased difficulty reduces the mining proceeds of the equipment proportionally and eventually requires bitcoin miners to
upgrade their mining equipment to remain profitable and compete effectively with other miners. Difficulty and network conditions are
outside of our control and can materially affect our self‑mining revenue and margins.
Tariffs
Beginning on February 1, 2025, the United States government announced a series of additional tariffs on goods imported to the
United States, raising concerns about material price inflation and delivery delays with respect to equipment and materials needed for
our high-density colocation data center conversions and also with respect to parts, machinery and hardware used in our digital asset
mining business. To date, tariffs have had no material impact on our costs or business operations, but we continue to analyze the
impact of these tariffs on our business and actions we can take to minimize any future impact. Our agreement with our HDC customer
is funded almost entirely by the customer and our financial contribution is capped at a fixed dollar amount, limiting the overall
potential impact of tariffs on our existing and future capital expenditures. Tariffs, however, could have additional impacts on our
results of operations in future years. To the extent tariffs increase the cost and/or lead time of key equipment and materials, they could
affect conversion economics, timelines and/or operating costs, which could affect the timing and profitability of our colocation
expansion.
Electricity Costs
Electricity cost is the major operating cost for our mining fleet, as well as for the hosted mining services provided to customers.
The cost and availability of electricity are affected primarily by changes in seasonal demand, with peak demand during the summer
months driving higher costs and increased curtailments to support grid operators. Severe winter weather can increase the cost of
electricity and the frequency of curtailments when it results in damage to power transmission infrastructure that reduces the grid’s
ability to deliver power. Geopolitical and macroeconomic factors, such as overseas military or economic conflict between states, can
adversely affect electricity costs by raising the cost of power generation inputs such as natural gas. Other events out of our control can
also impact electricity costs and availability. In our self‑mining and hosted mining operations, increases in power prices and/or
increased curtailments can materially reduce margins and cash generation. In our colocation operations, power costs are passed
through to customers and changes in power prices may increase revenue and cost of colocation services without a corresponding
change in gross profit.
Our Competition and Customers
In addition to factors underlying our mining business growth and profitability, the success of our Colocation business greatly
depends on our ability to retain and develop opportunities with our existing customers, secure additional infrastructure and attract new
customers.
Competition in digital asset mining is driven in part by access to low‑cost power, scale, fleet efficiency and capital availability,
and can contribute to increases in network hash rate and difficulty. We face significant competition in every aspect of our business,
including, but not limited to, the acquisition of new miners, the ability to raise capital, obtaining low-cost electricity, obtaining access
to sites with reliable sources of high power, and evaluating new technology developments in the industry.
Based on available data, we believe that an increase in the scale and sophistication of competition in the digital asset mining
industry has continued to increase network hash rate, with new entrants and existing competitors increasing the number of miners
mining for bitcoin.
Despite this trend, our ability to compete in self‑mining will depend on managing fleet efficiency, power costs and capital
allocation as we shift resources toward colocation.
In our Colocation operations, we compete with other providers of high-power data center capacity, such as major data center
real estate investment trusts, developers of data centers, hyperscalers and bitcoin miners with capacity suitable for high-density
colocation services. This competition focuses primarily on the identification and acquisition of new, high-power sites, but also
includes competition for the capital required to build or modify existing sites to support high-density colocation.
Competition in colocation may affect pricing, contract terms, and the pace at which we can secure additional power and sites,
and therefore may affect revenue growth and required capital expenditures.
54
Regulation
We operate in a dynamic regulatory environment. For a discussion of federal, state, and international regulatory developments
affecting our digital asset mining and colocation activities, see “Government Regulation” in the Part I, Item 1 “Business” section in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We continue to evaluate whether any such developments present known trends or uncertainties that
may materially impact our operations, energy costs, or customer demand. Regulatory developments affecting digital assets, data
centers, energy markets and environmental matters could affect compliance costs, power availability and pricing, and customer
demand, which could impact our results of operations and liquidity.
Key Business Operating Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to our financial results, we use the following business operating metrics and non-GAAP financial measures to
evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends affecting our business, and make strategic decisions. These operating
metrics and non‑GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, our consolidated financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”).
Management also uses the following data center capacity and power metrics (measured in megawatts) to evaluate the scale of
our utility power footprint and customer IT load capacity, monitor customer commitments and remaining available capacity, assess
commissioning progress and deployment pacing, and inform capital allocation and site planning decisions. Unless otherwise indicated,
these metrics are presented as of period end and represent management estimates based on operational and engineering data and may
not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other operators.
Metric (MW) | Definition | How management uses it |
Gross Utility Power Capacity | Total electric utility power capacity agreements associated with our data center sites under our control as of period end, including capacity that is commissioned for future use. | Used for portfolio planning and utility power allocation discussions. |
Total Leasable Customer Power Capacity | Our estimate of the total non-redundant customer IT load that our data center sites could support in the aggregate as of period end, regardless of whether such capacity has been contracted with customers or remains available for sale. This metric is representative of the amount of power available for customer use in servicing their workloads. | Used to assess total customer‑usable IT load available for leasing, evaluate leased versus unleased capacity, and plan conversion/ development sequencing and sales capacity. |
Leased Customer Power Capacity | Power capacity that is committed to customers under executed customer contracts, regardless of whether service has commenced as of period end. | Used to monitor signed customer commitments and contracted backlog and to plan future deployment/commissioning requirements. |
Unleased Customer Power Capacity | The portion of Total Leasable Customer Power not committed under customer contracts as of period end. This metric is calculated as Total Leasable Customer Power minus Leased Customer Power Capacity. | Used to monitor remaining uncommitted customer IT load and to prioritize incremental contracting and conversion/commissioning plans. |
Billable Customer Power Capacity | Portion of Leased Customer Power Capacity for which service has commenced and we are actively billing as of period end. | Used to monitor in-service customer power that is billing and to track deployment/ commissioning pace and near-term revenue ramp. |
55
The following table presents the values for these metrics as of December 31, 2025 (in megawatts).
December 31, | |
2025 | |
Gross Utility Power Capacity | 1,426 |
Total Leasable Customer Power Capacity | 920 |
Leased Customer Power Capacity | 590 |
Unleased Customer Power Capacity | 330 |
Billable Customer Power Capacity | 120 |
Adjusted EBITDA
We report our financial results in accordance with GAAP. To supplement our consolidated financial statements, we provide
investors with Adjusted EBITDA, which is a non‑GAAP financial measure. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as our net loss, adjusted to
eliminate the effect of (i) interest income, interest expense, and other income (expense), net; (ii) provision for income taxes;
(iii) depreciation and amortization; (iv) stock-based compensation expense; (v) Reorganization items, net; (vi) unrealized fair value
adjustment on energy derivatives; (vii) change in fair value of warrant and contingent value rights; (viii) Colocation segment startup
costs primarily related to the initial ramp up of new colocation sites, (ix) impairment of property, plant and equipment, (x) site
demolition costs incurred in connection with the conversion of existing facilities to colocation data center operations, (xi) post-
emergence bankruptcy advisory costs incurred related to reorganization, (xii) transaction costs incurred in connection with the Merger
Agreement, including advisory, legal, and other professional or consulting fees, (xiii) loss on legal settlements, and (xiv) certain
additional non-cash items that do not reflect the performance of our ongoing business operations. The most directly comparable
GAAP measure to Adjusted EBITDA is net loss. For additional information, including a reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted
EBITDA, please refer to the table below.
We believe Adjusted EBITDA is an important measure because it allows management, investors, and our Board of Directors to
evaluate and compare our operating results, including our return on capital and operating efficiencies, from period-to-period by
making the adjustments described above. In addition, it provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and
evaluating our results of operations, as well as provides a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of our business, as it
removes the effect of net interest expense, taxes, certain non-cash items, variable charges and timing differences. Moreover, we have
included Adjusted EBITDA in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because it is a key measurement used by our management internally
to make operating decisions, including those related to operating expenses, evaluate performance, and perform strategic and financial
planning.
The above items are excluded from our Adjusted EBITDA measure because these items are non-cash in nature or because the
amount and timing of these items are not related to the current results of our core business operations which renders evaluation of our
current performance, comparisons of performance between periods and comparisons of our current performance with our competitors
less meaningful. However, you should be aware that when evaluating Adjusted EBITDA, we may incur future expenses similar to
those excluded when calculating this measure. Our presentation of this measure should not be construed as an inference that its future
results will be unaffected by unusual items. Further, this non-GAAP financial measure should not be considered in isolation from, or
as a substitute for, financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily
on GAAP results and using Adjusted EBITDA on a supplemental basis. Our computation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be
comparable to other similarly titled measures computed by other companies because not all companies calculate this measure in the
same fashion. You should review the reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA below and not rely on any single financial
measure to evaluate our business.
56
The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024
(in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, | |||
2025 | 2024 | ||
Adjusted EBITDA | |||
Net loss | $(288,616) | $(1,437,874) | |
Adjustments: | |||
Interest (income) expense, net | (3,277) | 37,070 | |
Income tax expense | 583 | 859 | |
Depreciation and amortization | 68,841 | 113,205 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | 98,236 | 51,924 | |
Unrealized fair value adjustment on energy derivatives | — | (2,262) | |
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment | 9,680 | 4,210 | |
Impairment of property, plant and equipment | 11,359 | 122,869 | |
Site conversion demolition costs | 4,442 | — | |
Loss on debt extinguishment | 1,933 | 487 | |
Colocation startup costs | — | 4,611 | |
Merger Agreement related costs | 21,588 | — | |
Post-emergence bankruptcy advisory costs | 1,784 | 4,822 | |
Reorganization items, net | — | (111,439) | |
Change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights | 33,059 | 1,369,157 | |
Loss on legal settlements | 10,690 | 2,070 | |
Other non-operating expense (income), net | 39 | (2,395) | |
Other | — | 123 | |
Adjusted EBITDA | $(29,659) | $157,437 | |
57
Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated statements of operations for each of the periods indicated (in
thousands).
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | $ Change | |||
Revenue: | |||||
Colocation revenue | $65,424 | $24,378 | $41,046 | ||
Digital asset self-mining revenue | 229,207 | 408,740 | (179,533) | ||
Digital asset hosted mining revenue from customers | 24,388 | 77,554 | (53,166) | ||
Total revenue | 319,019 | 510,672 | (191,653) | ||
Cost of revenue: | |||||
Cost of colocation services | 45,679 | 21,709 | 23,970 | ||
Cost of digital asset self-mining | 218,868 | 314,335 | (95,467) | ||
Cost of digital asset hosted mining services | 16,574 | 53,558 | (36,984) | ||
Total cost of revenue | 281,121 | 389,602 | (108,481) | ||
Gross profit | 37,898 | 121,070 | (83,172) | ||
Decrease in fair value of digital assets | 31,603 | 1,052 | 30,551 | ||
Decrease in fair value of energy derivatives | — | 2,757 | (2,757) | ||
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment | 9,680 | 4,210 | 5,470 | ||
Impairment of property, plant and equipment | 11,359 | 122,869 | (111,510) | ||
Colocation organizational and site startup costs | 48,249 | 13,734 | 34,515 | ||
Advisor fees | 23,372 | 4,822 | 18,550 | ||
Selling, general and administrative | 159,224 | 113,691 | 45,533 | ||
Operating loss | (245,589) | (142,065) | (103,524) | ||
Non-operating expense (income), net: | |||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | 1,933 | 487 | 1,446 | ||
Interest (income) expense, net | (3,277) | 37,070 | (40,347) | ||
Change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights | 33,059 | 1,369,157 | (1,336,098) | ||
Reorganization items, net | — | (111,439) | 111,439 | ||
Loss on legal settlements | 10,690 | 2,070 | 8,620 | ||
Other non-operating expense (income), net | 39 | (2,395) | 2,434 | ||
Total non-operating expense, net | 42,444 | 1,294,950 | (1,252,506) | ||
Loss before income taxes | (288,033) | (1,437,015) | 1,148,982 | ||
Income tax expense | 583 | 859 | (276) | ||
Net loss | $(288,616) | $(1,437,874) | $1,149,258 | ||
58
The following table summarizes gross profit and gross margin by reportable segment for 2025 and 2024.
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | Change | |||
Colocation Segment | |||||
Colocation gross profit | $19,745 | $2,669 | $17,076 | ||
Colocation gross margin | 30% | 11% | 19% | ||
Digital Asset Self-Mining Segment | |||||
Digital asset self-mining gross profit | $10,339 | $94,405 | $(84,066) | ||
Digital asset self-mining gross margin | 5% | 23% | (18)% | ||
Digital Asset Hosted Mining Segment | |||||
Digital asset hosted mining gross profit | $7,814 | $23,996 | $(16,182) | ||
Digital asset hosted mining gross margin | 32% | 31% | 1% | ||
Gross profit represents segment revenue less segment cost of revenue. Accordingly, the year over year changes in gross profit
and gross margin by segment are primarily driven by the changes in revenue and cost of revenue discussed in the “Revenue” and
“Cost of revenue” sections below.
Revenue
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | $ Change | |||
Revenue: | |||||
Colocation revenue | $65,424 | $24,378 | $41,046 | ||
Digital asset self-mining revenue | 229,207 | 408,740 | (179,533) | ||
Digital asset hosted mining revenue from customers | 24,388 | 77,554 | (53,166) | ||
Total revenue | $319,019 | $510,672 | $(191,653) | ||
Percentage of total revenue: | |||||
Colocation revenue | 20% | 5% | |||
Digital asset self-mining revenue | 72% | 80% | |||
Digital asset hosted mining revenue from customers | 8% | 15% | |||
Total revenue | 100% | 100% | |||
Colocation revenue
Colocation revenue consists of fees charged to customers for licensed data center space, power and related services. Under our
contracts, customers generally pay fixed monthly fees based on billable customer power capacity and variable usage‑based charges
and other billable services. Power fees are passed through to customers without markup and are recognized as revenue on a gross
basis, with a corresponding charge to cost of colocation services. As a result, changes in power prices can cause fluctuations in
colocation revenue that are not indicative of changes in our underlying colocation margins.
The year over year increase in colocation revenue was primarily attributable to incremental billable customer power capacity at
our Denton, Texas and Marble, North Carolina data centers. In addition, lease operations at our Austin, Texas data center, which
commenced in the second quarter of 2024, contributed to higher colocation revenue.
Digital asset self-mining revenue
Digital asset self‑mining revenue consists primarily of bitcoin earned from operating our owned mining fleet. We participate in
mining pools under which we receive consideration based on the hash rate we contribute to the pool.
The year over year decrease in self-mining revenue was driven primarily by lower bitcoin production, partially offset by higher
average bitcoin prices.
59
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | % Change | |||
Bitcoin mined | 2,276 | 6,595 | (65)% | ||
Average price of bitcoin | $101,639 | $65,894 | 54% | ||
Self-mining hash rate | 15.7 | 19.1 | (18)% | ||
The decrease in bitcoin mined was driven primarily by (i) a reduction in our deployed mining fleet due primarily to our
strategic shift to colocation, (ii) the Bitcoin network’s halving, which reduced bitcoin earned per unit of hash rate beginning in April
2024, and (iii) more challenging network conditions, including higher network difficulty.
Digital asset hosted mining revenue
Digital asset hosted mining revenue represents fees earned for providing infrastructure, power and related services to third‑party
miners. Under our hosting contracts, customers are generally billed monthly based on power capacity and/or power consumption over
the term of the arrangement, which typically ranges from one to three years.
The year over year decrease in hosted mining revenue from customers was primarily driven by our shift to our Colocation
operations.
Cost of revenue
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | $ Change | |||
Cost of revenue: | |||||
Cost of colocation services | $45,679 | $21,709 | $23,970 | ||
Cost of digital asset self-mining | 218,868 | 314,335 | (95,467) | ||
Cost of digital asset hosted mining services | 16,574 | 53,558 | (36,984) | ||
Total cost of revenue | $281,121 | $389,602 | $(108,481) | ||
Cost of revenue includes the costs to operate our colocation, digital asset self‑mining, and digital asset hosted mining
businesses, including power fees, depreciation, personnel and facility-related costs.
Colocation cost of revenue
The year over year increase in cost of colocation services was driven primarily by incremental billable capacity at our Denton,
Texas and Marble, North Carolina data centers during 2025. In addition, costs related to lease operations at our Austin, Texas data
center, which commenced in the second quarter of 2024, contributed to higher colocation cost of revenue in 2025.
Digital asset self-mining cost of revenue
The year over year decrease in cost of digital asset self-mining was driven primarily by reduced self-mining activity during
2025, including lower power consumption and depreciation.
Digital asset hosted mining cost of revenue
The year over year decrease in cost of digital asset hosted mining services was driven primarily by the wind-down of hosted
mining arrangements, which resulted in lower power consumption.
60
Decrease in fair value of digital assets
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | $ Change | |||
Decrease in fair value of digital assets | $31,603 | $1,052 | $30,551 | ||
Percentage of total revenue | 10% | —% | |||
The year over year change in fair value of digital assets was primarily driven by higher bitcoin holdings in 2025 under our
bitcoin holding strategy and bitcoin price declines during portions of 2025.
Impairment of property, plant and equipment
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | $ Change | |||
Impairment of property, plant and equipment | 11,359 | 122,869 | $(111,510) | ||
Percentage of total revenue | 4% | 24% | |||
The year over year decrease was primarily driven by a lower volume of assets committed to demolition in connection with the
conversion of data center facilities from digital asset mining to high-density colocation operations, compared to a significantly higher
volume of such charges recognized in 2024. We expect to incur future impairments of PP&E at the point at which the assets become
committed to demolition, which is generally expected to occur at the time of colocation customer contract execution.
Colocation organizational and site startup costs
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | $ Change | |||
Colocation organizational and site startup costs | $48,249 | $13,734 | $34,515 | ||
Percentage of total revenue | 15% | 3% | |||
Colocation organizational and site startup costs primarily consist of employee compensation, including stock-based
compensation. The year over year increase was primarily driven by site startup costs incurred to convert facilities from digital asset
mining to colocation operations, partially offset by the absence of organizational startup costs incurred in 2024 in connection with the
formation of the colocation segment.
Selling, general and administrative
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | $ Change | |||
Selling, general and administrative | $159,224 | $113,691 | $45,533 | ||
Percentage of total revenue | 50% | 22% | |||
Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) consist primarily of personnel-related costs and professional fees.
61
The increase in SG&A was driven primarily by:
•a $34.1 million increase in stock-based compensation expense;
•a $6.8 million increase in payroll expense; and
•a $6.4 million increase in professional fees.
Non-operating expenses (income), net
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | $ Change | |||
Non-operating expenses (income), net: | |||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | $1,933 | $487 | $1,446 | ||
Interest (income) expense, net | (3,277) | 37,070 | (40,347) | ||
Change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights | 33,059 | 1,369,157 | (1,336,098) | ||
Reorganization items, net | — | (111,439) | 111,439 | ||
Loss on legal settlements | 10,690 | 2,070 | 8,620 | ||
Other non-operating expense (income), net | 39 | (2,395) | 2,434 | ||
Total non-operating expense, net | $42,444 | $1,294,950 | $(1,252,506) | ||
Non-operating expenses (income), net primarily reflects (i) non-cash changes in the fair value of warrants and contingent value
rights and (ii) interest (income) expense, net, and reorganization-related items.
•The year over year decrease in change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights was driven by changes in our
stock price, which increased by $0.51 per share during 2025, compared to an increase of $10.61 from January 23, 2024, the
date of our emergence from bankruptcy, to December 31, 2024; and
•The absence of Reorganization items, net in 2025 was due to our emergence from bankruptcy on January 23, 2024.
•The year over year decrease in Interest (income) expense, net was driven primarily by a $23.2 million decrease in interest
expense due to lower interest rates on outstanding debt, including the repayment of certain higher-interest notes during 2025,
and a $17.3 million increase in interest income earned on money market funds.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources and Uses of Cash
We finance our operating and capital requirements primarily through a combination of (i) cash and cash equivalents, (ii) cash
generated from operations, (iii) sales of digital assets (bitcoin), subject to market conditions and our treasury strategy, and (iv)
financing activities, including debt financing arrangements. We also receive customer prepayments under our colocation
arrangements, which are associated with, and are expected to offset a significant portion of, the capital expenditures required to build
out and convert facilities for those arrangements.
During 2026, we currently expect to monetize substantially all of our bitcoin holdings, subject to market conditions, to enhance
liquidity and fund our planned capital expenditures and other cash requirements. We currently anticipate that the majority of these
sales would occur during the first quarter of 2026. However, the timing and amount of any sales will depend on market conditions and
our liquidity needs and may change.
Our planned capital expenditures and other cash requirements may require additional external financing. We may from time to
time seek additional financing to fund our operations and capital expenditures. If we are unable to obtain financing on acceptable
terms, we may be required to reduce, delay or modify planned expenditures or pursue other alternatives.
We have assessed our current and expected operating and capital expenditure requirements and our current and expected
sources of liquidity, and have determined, based on our forecasted financial results and financial condition as of December 31, 2025,
62
that our available liquidity, including cash and cash equivalents and expected operating cash flows and customer funding related to our
colocation arrangements, will be sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.
The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents and the fair value of our digital assets (in thousands):
December 31, | |||
2025 | 2024 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents | $311,378 | $836,197 | |
Digital assets | $222,000 | $23,893 | |
The following table presents our cash flows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, | |||
2025 | 2024 | ||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 278,250 | 42,896 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | (740,750) | (95,192) | |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (63,102) | 819,567 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities increased to $278.3 million in 2025 from $42.9 million in 2024, primarily due to
higher cash inflows from operating working capital driven by deferred revenue associated with colocation services.
Net cash used in investing activities increased to $740.8 million in 2025 from $95.2 million in 2024, primarily reflecting capital
expenditures related to our colocation expansion.
Net cash used in financing activities was $63.1 million in 2025 compared to net cash provided of $819.6 million in 2024,
primarily due to the absence of prior-year financing proceeds.
Material Cash Requirements
Our material cash requirements from known contractual and other obligations consist primarily of (i) obligations for long-term
debt and related interest, (ii) operating lease obligations for property, and (iii) capital expenditure commitments related to the
conversion of a significant portion of our data centers to high-density colocation operations.
During 2025 and 2024, we spent $729.0 million and $95.0 million on capital expenditures, respectively. We expect to increase
capital expenditures in 2026 relative to 2025 to support our strategic shift to colocation services.
For additional information regarding our operating lease obligations, convertible notes, and purchase commitments, refer to
Note 7 — Leases, Note 8 — Convertible and Other Notes Payable, and Note 11 — Commitments and Contingencies, respectively, to
our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The critical accounting estimates, assumptions, judgments and the related policies that we believe have the most significant
impact on our consolidated financial statements are described below.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
The Company has made significant investments in Bitcoin mining equipment, which constitutes a substantial portion of its
property, plant, and equipment. Accounting for this equipment involves significant judgment and estimation uncertainty, particularly
regarding the determination of its estimated useful life for depreciation purposes and the assessment of potential impairment.
The Company depreciates its Bitcoin mining equipment using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of three
years. This estimate reflects management’s judgment based on the current state of technology and industry practices. However, the
actual useful life of this equipment is uncertain due to the rapid pace of technological advancements in the Bitcoin mining industry.
63
The Company evaluates its Bitcoin mining equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of the equipment may not be recoverable. Recoverability is assessed by comparing the carrying amount of the
asset to the sum of the undiscounted futures cash flows expected from its use and disposal. If the carrying amount is not recoverable,
the impairment loss is measured as the difference between the carrying amount and the asset's fair value. Potential impairment triggers
include a significant decline in the market price of Bitcoin or the introduction of new technologies that reduce the efficiency or
profitability of the Company’s existing equipment. These assessments rely on significant judgment and require assumptions about
future events and conditions, including Bitcoin prices, mining difficulty rates, electricity costs, and anticipated technological
advancements.
Management believes that its current estimates and assumptions are reasonable based on the information available. Actual
results may differ, and any such differences could materially impact the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
Stock-Based Compensation
The valuation of equity awards that contain market conditions, including the 2025 performance restricted stock units with a
relative total shareholder return condition, requires the use of a Monte Carlo pricing model. The model incorporates assumptions that
are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement, including expected volatility of the Company’s common
stock and its correlation with the Russell 2000 Index, which reflect anticipated variability and relative performance of the Company’s
stock price over the performance period. These assumptions involve judgment and are based on a combination of historical data and
market information. If different assumptions had been used, the resulting grant-date fair value of these awards, and the related stock-
based compensation expense recognized over the requisite service period, could have been materially different. Management believes
the estimates and assumptions used in the valuation of these awards are reasonable based on information available at the time of grant.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of new accounting standards relevant to our business, refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to market risks in the ordinary course of our business. Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact
our financial position due to adverse changes in financial market prices and rates. Our market risk exposure is primarily the result of
fluctuations in the price of bitcoin and commodities.
Risk Regarding the Price of Bitcoin
As of December 31, 2025, we held 2,537 bitcoin, with a carrying value of $222.0 million, all of which were produced from our
bitcoin mining operations.
We cannot predict the future market price of bitcoin and, as such, we cannot predict future changes in the carrying value of our
bitcoin assets based on future market prices. The future value of bitcoin will affect the amount of revenue recognized from our
operations, and any changes in the future value of bitcoin while we hold it in our account would also be reported in our net income (or
loss), either of which could have a material adverse effect on the market price for our securities.
Bitcoin prices for the year ended December 31, 2025 ranged from a low of $74,485 to a high of $126,210, with an average price
of $101,639.
Commodity Price Risk
Certain operating costs incurred by us are subject to price fluctuations caused by the volatility of underlying commodity prices,
the most significant of which is electricity. We closely monitor the cost of electricity at all of our locations. Our colocation customer
agreements include power pass-through provisions that allow us to recover the cost of customer power usage. We did not have
commodity derivative instruments outstanding as of December 31, 2025.
64
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, included in Part IV, Item 15(1)(a) herein, are incorporated by
reference into this Item 8.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS
65
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors Core Scientific, Inc.:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Core Scientific, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December
31, 2025, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the year then ended,
and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal
Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our
report dated March 2, 2026 expressed an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB
and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to
error or fraud. Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial
statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining,
on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included
evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements
that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are
material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The
communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a
whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or
on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Evaluation of the sufficiency of audit evidence over self-mining revenue
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company provides hash calculations to third-party pool operators
as a participant in mining pools. Contract inception and the Company’s enforceable right to consideration begin when the Company
commences providing hash calculation services to the mining pool operators. The Company is entitled to non-cash compensation
based on the Full-Pay-Per-Share (“FPPS”) model of the mining pool in which it participates. The Company recognizes non-cash
consideration on the same day that control of the contracted service is transferred to the pool operator, which is the same day as the
contract inception. For the year ended December 31, 2025, revenue from digital assets self-mining revenue was $229.2 million.
We identified the evaluation of the sufficiency of audit evidence over self-mining revenue as a critical audit matter. Subjective auditor
judgment was required to evaluate the nature and extent of procedures performed over completeness, existence, and accuracy of the
self-mining revenue recognized.
The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the
operating effectiveness of certain controls over the completeness, existence, and accuracy of self-mining revenue. We obtained
confirmations from third-party mining pool operators of the total mining rewards earned, the hashrate contributed by the Company and
the digital asset wallet addresses in which the rewards were deposited. We performed procedures around period end to evaluate
66
whether self-mining revenue was recognized in the appropriate accounting period. For a sample of the Company’s self-mining revenue
transactions, we:
•recalculated the Company’s recorded self-mining revenue
•compared the Company’s record of self-mining revenue to the records of the public blockchain using a proprietary
software audit tool
•evaluated the reasonableness of the digital asset prices utilized by the Company to record digital assets received as self-
mining revenue by obtaining independent digital asset prices and comparing those to the prices selected by the Company.
/s/ KPMG LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2025.
March 2, 2026
67
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 688)
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
Core Scientific, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Core Scientific, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024, the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period
ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”).
In our opinion, based on our audits, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Company as of December 31, 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended
December 31, 2024, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to
be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to
error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence
regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe
that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Marcum LLP
Marcum LLP
We served as the Company’s auditor from 2022 through 2025.
Costa Mesa, CA
February 26, 2025, except for the effects of the restatement disclosed in Note 3 (not presented herein) to the consolidated financial statements
appearing under Item 8 of the Company’s 2024 annual report on Form 10-K/A, as to which the date is March 2, 2026.
68
Core Scientific, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except par value)
December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | ||
Assets | |||
Current Assets: | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | |
Restricted cash | |||
Digital assets | |||
Customer funding receivable and other current assets | |||
Total Current Assets | |||
Property, plant and equipment, net | |||
Operating lease right-of-use assets | |||
Other noncurrent assets | |||
Total Assets | $ | $ | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit | |||
Current Liabilities: | |||
Accounts payable | $ | $ | |
Accrued expenses | |||
Deferred revenue | |||
Other current liabilities | |||
Total Current Liabilities | |||
Convertible and other notes payable, net of current portion | |||
Warrant liabilities | |||
Deferred revenue, net of current portion | |||
Other noncurrent liabilities | |||
Total Liabilities | |||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) | |||
Stockholders’ Deficit: | |||
Preferred stock; $ at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 | |||
Common stock; $ December 31, 2024; 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively | |||
Additional paid-in capital | |||
Accumulated deficit | ( | ( | |
Total Stockholders’ Deficit | ( | ( | |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit | $ | $ |
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current year presentation.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
69
Core Scientific, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Revenue: | |||||
Colocation revenue | $ | $ | $ | ||
Digital asset self-mining revenue | |||||
Digital asset hosted mining revenue from customers | |||||
Digital asset hosted mining revenue from related parties | |||||
Total revenue | |||||
Cost of revenue: | |||||
Cost of colocation services | |||||
Cost of digital asset self-mining | |||||
Cost of digital asset hosted mining services | |||||
Total cost of revenue | |||||
Gross profit | |||||
Decrease in fair value of digital assets | |||||
Gain from sale of digital assets | ( | ||||
Impairment of digital assets | |||||
Decrease in fair value of energy derivatives | |||||
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment | |||||
Impairment of property, plant and equipment | |||||
Colocation organizational and site startup costs | |||||
Advisor fees | |||||
Selling, general and administrative | |||||
Operating (loss) income | ( | ( | |||
Non-operating expenses (income), net: | |||||
Loss (gain) on debt extinguishment | ( | ||||
Interest (income) expense, net | ( | ||||
Change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights | |||||
Reorganization items, net | ( | ||||
Loss on legal settlements | |||||
Other non-operating expense (income), net | ( | ( | |||
Total non-operating expense, net | |||||
Loss before income taxes | ( | ( | ( | ||
Income tax expense | |||||
Net loss | $( | $( | $( | ||
Net loss per share, basic and diluted | $( | $( | $( | ||
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
70
Core Scientific, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit
(in thousands)
Common Stock | Additional Paid-In Capital | Accumulated Deficit | Total Stockholders’ Deficit | ||||||
Shares | Amount | ||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2023 | ( | ( | |||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | ( | ( | ||||
Stock-based compensation | — | — | — | ||||||
Exercise of stock options | — | — | — | — | |||||
Restricted stock awards issued, net of shares withheld for tax withholding obligations | — | — | — | — | |||||
Restricted stock awards forfeited | ( | — | — | — | — | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2023 | $ | $ | $( | $( | |||||
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASU 2023-08, Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets | — | — | — | ||||||
Balance at January 1, 2024, adjusted | ( | ( | |||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | ( | ( | ||||
Stock-based compensation | — | — | — | ||||||
Cancellation of common stock in connection with emergence | ( | ( | — | ||||||
Issuance of new common stock in connection with emergence | — | ||||||||
Issuance of new common stock under the Equity Rights Offering | — | — | |||||||
Issuance of new common stock for the Equity Rights Offering backstop commitment | — | — | |||||||
Issuance of new common stock for Bitmain obligation | — | — | |||||||
Conversion premium on the issuance of the New Secured Convertible Notes | — | — | — | ||||||
Issuance of warrants | — | — | ( | — | ( | ||||
Exercise of stock options | — | — | — | ||||||
Restricted stock awards issued, net of tax withholding obligations | — | ( | — | ( | |||||
Restricted stock awards forfeited | ( | — | — | — | — | ||||
Exercise of warrants | — | ||||||||
Issuance of new common stock for New Secured Convertible Notes conversion | — | — | |||||||
Issuance of new common stock for PIK interest | — | — | |||||||
Balance at December 31, 2024 | $ | $ | $( | $( | |||||
71
Core Scientific, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit (cont’d)
(in thousands)
Common Stock | Additional Paid-In Capital | Accumulated Deficit | Total Stockholders’ Deficit | ||||||
Shares | Amount | ||||||||
Balance at Balance at January 1, 2025 | ( | ( | |||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | ( | ( | ||||
Stock-based compensation | — | — | — | ||||||
Restricted stock awards issued | — | — | |||||||
Restricted stock awards withheld for tax withholding obligations | ( | — | ( | — | ( | ||||
Equity issuance costs | — | — | ( | — | ( | ||||
Exercise of warrants | $— | — | |||||||
Balance at December 31, 2025 | $ | $ | $( | $( | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
1 Proceeds from digital assets received as noncash revenue consideration liquidated nearly immediately after receipt as a routine operating activity.
72
Core Scientific, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Cash flows from Operating Activities: | |||||
Net loss | $( | $( | $( | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||
Depreciation and amortization | |||||
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment | |||||
Impairment of property, plant and equipment | |||||
Change in right-of-use assets | |||||
Stock-based compensation | |||||
Digital asset self-mining | ( | ( | ( | ||
Proceeds from sale of digital assets generated by self-mining and shared hosting revenues1 | — | ||||
Decrease in fair value of digital assets | |||||
Impairment of digital assets | |||||
Gain from sale of digital assets | ( | ||||
Change in fair value of energy derivatives | ( | ||||
Increase in fair value of warrant liabilities | |||||
Decrease in fair value of contingent value rights | ( | ( | |||
Loss (gain) on debt extinguishment | ( | ||||
Loss on issuance of notes payable through settlements | |||||
Amortization of debt discount | |||||
Non-cash reorganization items | ( | ||||
Non-cash PIK interest expense | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||
Accounts receivable, net | ( | ||||
Accounts receivable from related parties | |||||
Deposits for equipment for sales to customers | ( | ||||
Customer funding receivable and other current assets | ( | ( | |||
Accounts payable | ( | ||||
Accrued expenses | ( | ||||
Deferred revenue from colocation services | |||||
Deferred revenue from hosted mining services | ( | ( | |||
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities, net | ( | ( | ( | ||
Net cash provided by operating activities | |||||
Cash flows from Investing Activities: | |||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment | ( | ( | ( | ||
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment | |||||
Proceeds from sale of Cedarvale | |||||
Purchase of equity investments | ( | ||||
Investments in intangible assets | ( | ( | ( | ||
Net cash used in investing activities | ( | ( | ( | ||
Cash flows from Financing Activities: | |||||
Principal repayments of finance leases | ( | ( | ( | ||
Principal payments on debt | ( | ( | ( | ||
Debt extinguishment payments | ( | ||||
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards | ( | ||||
Proceeds from the issuance of | |||||
Issuance costs for | ( | ||||
Proceeds from the issuance of | |||||
Issuance costs for | ( | ||||
73
Proceeds from issuance of new common stock | |||||
Proceeds from draw from exit facility | |||||
Restricted stock tax holding obligations | ( | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of warrants | |||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | |||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | ( | ( | |||
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | ( | ||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash—beginning of period | |||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash—end of period | $ | $ | $ | ||
Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash within the consolidated balance sheets to the amounts shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows above: | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | $ | ||
Restricted cash | |||||
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | $ | $ | $ | ||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
74
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Core Scientific, Inc. (“Core Scientific” or the “Company”) provides digital infrastructure for high-density colocation services
and digital asset mining. We operate facilities for high-density colocation services and provide digital infrastructure, software
solutions and services to our third-party customers. We currently derive the majority of our revenue from earning digital assets for our
own account but expect to increase revenue derived from high-density colocation (“HDC”) as additional customer capacity becomes
billable. We are converting our existing facilities to support artificial intelligence-related (“AI”) workloads and next generation
colocation services as circumstances allow, and in a manner, designed to retain access to electrical power under our control, maximize
the value of our digital asset mining equipment to third parties, and fulfill our existing obligations to suppliers and customers. Our
facilities are located in Alabama (1 ), Georgia (2 ), Kentucky (1 ), North Carolina (1 ), North Dakota (1 ), Oklahoma (1 ), and Texas (3 ).
The Company had historically focused on designing, building and operating digital infrastructure to engage in digital asset
mining for its own account and providing hosting solutions for third-party digital asset miners. In 2024, the Company announced its
first high-density colocation contract with CoreWeave, Inc. (“CoreWeave), an artificial intelligence-focused hyperscaler. These
agreements leverage the Company’s existing digital infrastructure and expertise in third-party hosting solutions.
We operate in three segments: “Colocation,” consisting of providing high-density colocation services to customers employing
AI and high-performance computing (“HPC”) related workloads, “Digital Asset Self-Mining,” consisting of performing digital asset
mining for our own account, and “Digital Asset Hosted Mining,” consisting of providing hosting services to third parties for digital
asset mining. Prior to April 1, 2024, we operated primarily in the Digital Asset Self-Mining and Digital Asset Hosted Mining
segments.
Our high-density colocation services provide space, power, cooling, facilities operations, security and other services to third-
party colocation customers to support workloads for machine learning and AI. Colocation segment revenue is concentrated with a
single customer; see Note 15 — Segment Reporting.
Our digital asset hosted mining business provides a full suite of services to our digital asset mining customers. We provide
deployment, monitoring, troubleshooting, optimization and maintenance of our customers’ digital asset mining equipment and provide
necessary electrical power, repair and other infrastructure services necessary for our customers to operate, maintain and efficiently
mine digital assets.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the application of certain significant accounting policies as
described below and elsewhere in these notes to the consolidated financial statements.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (“GAAP”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Some of the more
significant estimates include assumptions used in property, plant and equipment, the initial measurement of lease liabilities, stock-
based compensation, the fair value of derivative liabilities, and income taxes. These estimates are based on information available as of
the date of the financial statements; therefore, actual results could differ from management’s estimates.
Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid investments, including money market funds, with original
maturities of three months or less from the date of acquisition. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, substantially all cash and cash
equivalents exceeded Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limits. Restricted cash as of December 31, 2024, consisted of a
deposit held at a lender’s bank in accordance with the terms of a note agreement.
75
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company’s accounts receivable balance consists of amounts due from its hosting customers. The Company records
accounts receivable at the invoiced amount less an allowance for any potentially uncollectible accounts under the current expected
credit loss (“CECL”) impairment model and presents the net amount of the financial instrument expected to be collected. The CECL
impairment model requires an estimate of expected credit losses, measured over the contractual life of an instrument, which considers
forecasts of future economic conditions in addition to information about past events and current conditions. Based on this model, the
Company considers many factors, including the age of the balance, collection history, and current economic trends. Bad debts are
written off after all collection efforts have ceased.
Allowances for credit losses are recorded as a direct reduction from an asset’s amortized cost basis. Credit losses and recoveries
are recorded in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. Recoveries of financial assets
previously written off are recorded when received. For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Company did not
record any credit losses or recoveries.
The Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts was nil
In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
2023-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Crypto Assets (Subtopic 350-60): Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets (“ASU
2023-08”). ASU 2023-08 is intended to improve the accounting for certain crypto assets by requiring an entity to measure those crypto
assets at fair value each reporting period with changes in fair value recognized in net income (loss). The amendments also improve the
information provided to investors about an entity’s crypto asset holdings by requiring disclosure about significant holdings,
contractual sale restrictions, and changes during the reporting period. ASU 2023-08 was effective for annual and interim reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted.
The Company’s digital assets are within the scope of ASU 2023-08 and the Company early adopted the new standard effective
January 1, 2024 on a modified retrospective basis. The transition guidance required a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the beginning
of the fiscal year of adoption for any difference between the carrying amount of the Company’s digital assets and fair value. The early
adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
As of August 19, 2024, the Company is no longer required to sell bitcoin it earns through mining within ten days of receipt as
previously required by the terms of extinguished debt facilities. The Company intends to optimize cash from the sale of bitcoin
received from mining activities, which may entail, subject to market conditions, holding bitcoin for future sale at any particular point
in time. Digital assets are classified as current assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, reflecting management's current
intent and expectation to convert these assets to cash within the next year. The classification of digital assets is evaluated regularly,
and any change in management's intent or expectations regarding the timing of conversion to cash could result in a reclassification of
these assets. Cash from sales of digital assets awarded to the Company through its self-mining activities are classified as cash flows
from operating activities if sold nearly immediately. The Company does not have any off-balance sheet holdings of digital assets and
does not safeguard digital assets for third parties. The Company tracks its cost basis of digital assets in accordance with the first-in-
first-out method of accounting.
76
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Level 1. The following table presents a roll-forward of total digital assets for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in
thousands):
December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | ||
Digital assets, beginning of period | $ | $ | |
Cumulative effect of ASU 2023-08, adopted January 1, 20241 | |||
Digital assets, beginning of period, as adjusted | |||
Digital asset self-mining revenue, net of receivables2 | |||
Mining revenue from shared hosting | |||
Proceeds from sales of digital assets and shared hosting | ( | ||
Decrease in fair value of digital assets | ( | ( | |
Payment of board fee | ( | ||
Other | ( | ||
Digital assets, end of period | $ | $ |
1 Reflects the impact of the Company’s early adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2023-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Crypto Assets (Subtopic
350-60): Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets (“ASU 2023-08”) effective January 1, 2024 on a modified retrospective basis.
2 As of December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, there was $0.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of digital asset receivable included in Customer funding
Quantity | Cost Basis | Fair Value | |||
December 31, 2025 | $ | $ | |||
December 31, 2024 | $ | $ |
The Company has entered into agreements with vendors to supply equipment for its digital asset mining operations. These
agreements generally require significant refundable deposits payable months in advance of delivery and additional advance payments
in monthly installments thereafter.
The Company classifies deposits for digital asset mining equipment based on the expected predominant source and use of the
cash flows for the equipment that has been contracted for purchase. The Company expects that the predominant source and use of cash
flows for digital asset mining equipment will be related to the Company’s own self-mining operations. Therefore, the Company has
Property, plant, and equipment includes the cost of land, buildings, and improvements for datacenter and support facilities and
the Company’s corporate office space. Property and equipment further consists of computer, mining, network, electrical and other
equipment, including property and equipment under finance leases. Property, plant and equipment, net is stated at cost less
accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are capitalized at cost and amortized over the shorter of their estimated
useful lives or the lease term. Future obligations related to finance leases are presented as Finance lease liabilities, current portion and
Finance lease liabilities, net of current portion in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Depreciation expense, including
amortization of assets held under finance leases, is primarily included in Cost of revenue in the Company’s consolidated statements of
operations.
Property, plant and equipment capitalized costs include the directly identifiable costs incurred to acquire, construct, install, or
otherwise prepare the asset for its intended use and to put it into service. Directly identifiable costs include construction payroll and
benefits and other direct capital project costs.
77
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
When management decides to abandon long-lived assets before the end of their previously estimated useful life, the Company
considers whether an impairment of the related asset group has been triggered. If that asset group is no longer recoverable, an
impairment is recognized for any excess of the asset group’s carrying value above its fair value. Thereafter, the estimated useful life,
salvage value, and prospective depreciation of the affected assets are revised to reflect their shortened remaining useful life. The
The Company has entered into operating and finance leases for office space, data facilities, computer and networking
equipment, electrical infrastructure and office equipment, with lease periods expiring through 2051. The Company determines whether
an arrangement contains a lease at the inception of the arrangement. If a lease is determined to exist, the term of such lease is assessed
based on the commencement date on which the underlying asset is made available for the Company’s use by the lessor. The
Company’s assessment of the lease term reflects the non-cancelable term of the lease, inclusive of any rent-free periods and periods
covered by early-termination options which the Company is reasonably certain of not exercising, as well as periods covered by
renewal options which the Company is reasonably certain of exercising. The Company also determines lease classification as either
operating or finance at lease commencement, which governs the pattern of expense recognition and presentation over the lease term.
For leases with a term exceeding 12 months, a lease liability is recognized on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets at
lease commencement, reflecting the present value of its fixed payment obligations over the lease term. A corresponding right-of-use
asset equal to the initial lease liability is also recognized, adjusted for any prepaid rent and initial direct costs incurred in connection
with the execution of the lease and reduced by any lease incentives received. For purposes of measuring the present value of its fixed
payment obligations for a given lease, the Company uses rates implicit in its leasing arrangements, if readily determinable, otherwise
the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate. The Company’s incremental borrowing rate reflects the rate it would pay to borrow
on a similarly secured basis and term, the economic environment of the associated lease, and other information available to
management.
For leases with a term of 12 months or less at commencement, and that do not include an option to purchase the underlying
assets, the Company has elected the exemption to not measure and recognize an associated lease liability or right-of-use asset.
For the Company’s operating leases, fixed lease payments are recognized as lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease
term. Variable lease costs are recognized as the obligation for payment is incurred and primarily consist of insurance and property tax
reimbursements to the lessor.
The Company addresses lease modifications that are not accounted for as separate leases at the effective date of the
modification. If the terms and conditions of the lease are changed, the lease payments are adjusted accordingly and the lease liability is
remeasured using a revised discount rate. Any resulting changes in the lease liability are recognized in the carrying amount of the
related right-of-use asset.
The Company tests long-lived asset groups for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances have occurred that
may affect the recoverability or the estimated useful lives of long-lived assets. Long-lived assets include property, plant and equipment
and intangible assets subject to amortization. A long-lived asset may be impaired when the estimated future undiscounted cash flows
are less than the carrying amount of the asset. If that comparison indicates that the asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable, the
impairment is measured based on the difference between the carrying amount and the estimated fair value of the asset. Long-lived
Deferred revenue from colocation services relate to prepaid base license fees for colocation lease arrangements which are
accounted for under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 842, Leases (“ASC Topic 842”). Prepaid base license fees relate to
capital expenditures on colocation facility site development funded by the customer. Deferred revenue from hosted mining services
relates to customer contracts for digital asset hosted mining services which are accounted for under ASC 606, Revenue Recognition
(“ASC Topic 606”). Advanced payments are typically recognized in the following month for hosted mining services and are generally
recognized within 30 months of license order commencement for colocation services.
78
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Deferred Revenue From Colocation Services | Deferred Revenue From Hosted Mining Services | Total Deferred Revenue | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | |||
Revenue recognized that was included in the deferred revenue balance as of the beginning of the year | ||||||
Additional customer funding received (reduced) | ( | |||||
Balance at December 31, 2024 | $ | $ | $ | |||
Revenue recognized that was included in the deferred revenue balance as of the beginning of the year | ( | ( | ( | |||
Base license fee earned, not yet due | ( | ( | ||||
Additional customer funding received | ||||||
Balance at December 31, 2025 | $ | $ | $ | |||
Current portion at December 31, 2025 | $ | |||||
Non-current portion at December 31, 2025 | $ |
Convertible and other notes payable (“Notes payable”) are accounted for under ASC 470, Debt and are presented at their
carrying value, which is their remaining par or face amount net of any related unamortized premium, discount and issuance costs.
Notes payable are initially recognized at their present value. When cash proceeds are received for the issuance of Notes payable, the
proceeds are used to establish their present value. When cash proceeds are not received for the issuance of Notes payable, their present
value is based on the consideration exchanged. This present value generally will be the Notes payable’s cash flows discounted at a
market rate when it is more evident than the noncash consideration exchanged. When the present value of Notes payable on issuance
varies from its par or face amount, an original discount or premium results and any related issuance costs are used to determine an
effective interest rate. Original premium, discount and issuance costs are amortized using the level effective rate interest method.
Amortization is recognized as a component of current interest expense.
Notes payable are evaluated at issuance to determine whether or not they have features or terms which would be treated as
embedded derivatives that are required to be bifurcated under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC Topic 815”). As of
December 31, 2025 and 2024, Notes payable did not have any embedded derivatives required to be bifurcated.
Debt issuance costs are capitalized and amortized over the term of the associated debt using the effective interest rate method.
Debt issuance costs are presented in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the
debt liability consistent with the debt discount.
The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments, including issued stock purchase warrants, to determine if such
instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. The classification of derivative instruments,
including whether such instruments should be classified as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period.
Prior to the Company’s emergence from bankruptcy on January 23, 2024 (the “Effective Date”), the Company had public
warrants and private placement warrants that were recognized as derivative liabilities. Accordingly, the Company recognized the
warrant instruments as liabilities at fair value and adjusted the instruments to fair value at each reporting period. The liabilities were
subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date, and any change in fair value was recognized in the Company’s consolidated
statements of operations and presented as Change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights. The initial and subsequent
estimated fair value of both the public warrants and private placement warrants was based on the listed price in an active market for
the public warrants.
79
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
As described in Note 9 — Warrant Liabilities and Contingent Value Rights, on the Effective Date, pursuant to the Company’s
plan of reorganization, holders of the Company’s previous common stock received warrants. The warrants are equity-linked
instruments. The Company determined that these equity-linked instruments are not indexed to the Company’s stock and are required
to be recognized as liabilities which are, initially and subsequently, measured at fair value with changes in value reflected in Net loss.
Contingent Value Rights Liabilities
As described in Note 9 — Warrant Liabilities and Contingent Value Rights, on the Effective Date, pursuant to the Company’s
plan of reorganization, the Company entered into a contingent value rights agreement (the “Contingent Value Rights Agreement”)
which provides for the issuance of the contingent value rights (the “CVRs”) to certain creditors and provides for the issuance of CVRs
issued to holders of allowed general unsecured claims (“GUC”) (in such capacity, the “GUC Payees”) (the “GUC CVRs”). The CVRs
and GUC CVRs are equity-linked instruments which are either only cash settled or in some instances share settled at the Company’s
sole discretion. The Company determined that these equity-linked instruments are not indexed to the Company’s stock and are
required to be recognized as liabilities which are, initially and subsequently, measured at fair value with changes in value reflected in
Net loss.
The Company’s Colocation segment generates revenue by licensing data center space to customers under licensing agreements.
These arrangements contain lease components for the right to use data center space and nonlease components for power delivery,
physical security, and maintenance services. The Company has elected the practical expedient available under ASC Topic 842, to
combine the nonlease revenue components that have the same pattern of transfer as the related operating lease components into a
single combined component. The single combined component is accounted for under ASC Topic 842 as an operating lease if the lease
components are the predominant components and is accounted for under ASC Topic 606 if the nonlease components are the
predominant components. The lease components are the predominant components in the Company’s current licensing arrangements
and the single combined component in these arrangements is accounted for under the operating lease guidance of ASC Topic 842.
The Company has concluded that it is probable that substantially all of the payments will be collected over the term of the
arrangements and recognizes the total combined component license payments under the agreements on a straight-line basis over the
non-cancellable term. The difference between straight-line license revenue and amounts billed or received is recorded as deferred
revenue in the consolidated balance sheets. Certain arrangements include options to extend the term. These extension options are not
reasonably certain to be exercised and are excluded from the lease term and calculation of lease payments at lease commencement.
Certain licensing arrangements provide for variable payments for power delivery services and maintenance services on
customer assets and reimbursements for lessor costs such as taxes. Payments for physical security and other routine maintenance
services are included in the fixed lease payments. Power delivery services represent a stand ready obligation to make power available
to the customer over the coterminous lease term and have the same pattern of transfer as the related operating lease components.
Customers may request and the Company may provide maintenance services on customer assets during the coterminous lease term.
Customers are charged monthly for fees incurred on these maintenance services delivered and actual power costs incurred at current
utility or fuel cost rates. These payments from customers for power delivery and maintenance services are recognized as variable lease
payments in accordance with the practical expedient elected. Variable lease payments are presented on a gross basis and are included
in Colocation revenue in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606.
One of the Company’s ongoing major or central operations is to provide hash calculations to third-party pool operators as a
participant in mining pools. The Company considers the third-party mining pool operators to be its customers under ASC Topic 606.
Contract inception and the Company’s enforceable right to consideration begin when the Company commences providing hash
calculation services to the mining pool operators. Each party to the contract has the unilateral right to terminate the contract at any
time without any compensation to the other party for such termination. As such, the duration of a contract is less than a day and may
be continuously renewed multiple times throughout the day. The implied renewal option is not a material right because there are no
upfront or incremental fees in the initial contract and the terms, conditions, and compensation amount for the renewal options are at
the then market rates.
80
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company is entitled to non-cash compensation based on the Full-Pay-Per-Share (“FPPS”) model of the mining pool in
which it participates. FPPS pools pay block rewards and transaction fees, net of mining pool fees, and participants are entitled to non-
cash consideration even if a block is not successfully validated by the mining pool operator. The Company is entitled to compensation
once it begins to perform hash calculations for the pool operator in accordance with the operator’s specifications over a daily 24-hour
period beginning 00:00:00 UTC and ending 23:59:59 UTC. The non-cash consideration for providing hash calculations to the pool
operator under the FPPS payout method is comprised of block rewards and transaction fees net of pool operator fees, determined as
follows:
•The non-cash consideration in the form of a block reward is based on the total blocks expected to be generated on the Bitcoin
Network for the daily 24-hour period beginning 00:00:00 UTC and ending 23:59:59 UTC in accordance with the following
formula: the daily hash calculations that the Company provided to the pool operator as a percent of the Bitcoin Network’s
implied hash calculations as determined by the network difficulty, multiplied by the total Bitcoin Network block rewards
expected to be generated for the same daily period.
•The non-cash consideration in the form of transaction fees paid by transaction requestors is based on the share of total actual
fees paid over the daily 24-hour period beginning 00:00:00 UTC and ending 23:59:59 UTC in accordance with the following
formula: total actual transaction fees generated on the Bitcoin Network during the 24-hour period as a percent of total block
rewards the Bitcoin Network actually generated during the same 24-hour period, multiplied by the block rewards the
Company earned for the same 24-hour period noted above.
•The block reward and transaction fees earned by the Company are reduced by mining pool fees charged by the operator for
operating the pool based on a rate schedule per the mining pool contract. The mining pool fee is only incurred to the extent
the Company performs hash calculations and generate revenue in accordance with the pool operator’s payout formula during
the same daily 24-hour period.
The above non-cash consideration is variable, since the amount of block reward earned depends on the amount of hash
calculations the Company performs; the amount of transaction fees the Company is entitled to depends on the actual Bitcoin Network
transaction fees over the same 24-hour period; and the operator fees for the same 24-hour period are variable since they are determined
based on the total block rewards and transaction fees in accordance with the pool operator’s agreement. The Company estimates
variable consideration at contract inception and includes amounts for which it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of
revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty is subsequently resolved. The Company recognizes the non-cash consideration
on the same day that control is transferred of the underlying bitcoin, which is the same day as contract inception.
The Company measures the non-cash consideration using the spot rate for Bitcoin as quoted on Coinbase Global, Inc., the
Company’s principal market. The Company recognizes non-cash consideration on the same day that control of the contracted service
is transferred to the pool operator, which is the same day as the contract inception.
Direct expenses associated with providing hash calculation services to a third-party operated mining pool are recorded as cost
of revenues. Depreciation and amortization expenses on fixed and right-of-use assets, including digital asset mining equipment, used
to provide the services are also recorded as a component of cost of revenues.
Revenue From Contracts With Customers - Digital Asset Hosted Mining Services
The Company generates revenue from contracts with customers from digital asset hosted mining services. The Company
recognizes revenue when the promised service is performed. Revenue excludes any amounts collected on behalf of third parties,
including sales and indirect taxes.
Hosting Services
The Company regularly enters contracts that include hosting services, for which revenue is recognized as services are
performed on a variable basis. The Company performs hosting services that enable customers to run blockchain and other high-
performance computing operations. The Company’s performance obligation related to these services is satisfied over time. The
Company recognizes revenue for services that are performed on a consumption basis, such as the amount of electricity used in a
period, based on the customer’s use of such resources. The Company recognizes variable consumption usage hosting revenue each
month as the uncertainty related to the consideration is resolved, hosting services are provided to our customers, and our customers
utilize the hosting services (the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits of the Company’s performance). The
Company generally bills its customers in advance based on estimated consumption under the contract. The Company recognizes
81
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
revenue based on actual consumption in the period and invoices adjustments in subsequent periods or retains credits toward future
consumption. The term between invoicing and when payment is due typically does not exceed 30 days.
As of December 31, 2025, the Company had no outstanding performance obligations for contracts with original terms
exceeding one year.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s performance obligation commitments related to digital asset hosted mining services.
The Company had performance obligations associated with commitments in customer digital asset hosted mining contracts for future
services that have not yet been recognized in the financial statements. As of December 31, 2024, for contracts with original terms that
exceed one year (typically ranging from 15 to 24 months), the Company expected to recognize approximately $8.4 million of revenue
in the future related to performance obligations associated with existing hosted mining contracts. The Company recognized
approximately 100 % of this amount over the next 12 months.
The Company’s Cost of colocation services, Cost of digital asset self-mining and Cost of digital asset hosted mining services
primarily consist of power fees, depreciation expense, facility operations expense and employee compensation, including stock-based
Under ASC 718, Stock Compensation, the Company accounts for stock-based compensation expense using a fair-value-based
method. Stock-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date based on the estimated fair value of the equity award. The
estimated fair value of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) with only service conditions is based on the closing market price of the
Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The estimated fair value of RSUs that include market conditions (“MSUs”) is
estimated on the date of grant using the Monte Carlo pricing model for each service and market condition tranche. The estimated fair
value of RSUs that include performance conditions (“PSUs”) is generally based on the closing market price of the Company’s
common stock on the date of grant; however, for PSUs that include market conditions, the estimated fair value is on the date of grant
using a Monte Carlo pricing model.
For RSU awards with only service conditions, the estimated fair value of the equity awards is recognized as expense on a
straight-line basis, less actual forfeitures as they occur, over the requisite service period for the entire award, which is generally the
vesting period. For RSU awards with service and market conditions, the compensation expense is recognized for each separately
vesting portion of the award, or tranche, as if it were a separate award with its own vesting and exercise conditions (i.e., on an
accelerated attribution basis). The estimated fair value of each tranche is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis, less actual
forfeitures as they occur, over the requisite service for the tranche. The requisite service period of each tranche is the greater of the
derived service period from the market condition or the service condition vesting period. For RSU awards with performance
conditions, compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period based on the number of awards expected to vest. The
Company recognizes compensation expense for awards with performance conditions only when it is probable that the performance
condition will be achieved and adjusts compensation expense using a cumulative catch-up approach for changes in the expected
outcome. Compensation expense for awards with performance conditions is reversed for awards that do not vest due to the failure to
satisfy the performance condition. Compensation expense for awards with market conditions is not reversed if the market condition is
service, market and performance conditions associated with the Company’s equity awards.
The Company is subject to income taxes mainly in the jurisdictions in which it provides various infrastructure, technology and
hosting services. The Company’s tax position requires significant judgment in order to properly evaluate and quantify tax positions
and to determine the provision for income taxes.
The Company uses the assets and liabilities method to account for income taxes, which requires that deferred tax assets and
deferred tax liabilities be determined based on the differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities,
using enacted tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to be reversed. The Company estimates its actual
82
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
current tax expense, including permanent charges and benefits, and the temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of
items, for tax and financial accounting purposes.
The Company assesses whether it is more likely than not that its deferred tax assets will be realized by considering both
positive and negative evidence. If the Company believes that recovery of these deferred tax assets is not more likely than not, the
Company establishes a valuation allowance. Significant judgment is required in determining any valuation allowance recorded against
deferred tax assets. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, the Company considered all available evidence, including recent
operating results, projections of future taxable income, the reversal of taxable temporary differences, and the feasibility of tax planning
strategies.
GAAP sets forth a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax
position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will
be sustained upon examination, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the
tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. Interest and penalties related to
unrecognized tax benefits are included within Income Tax Expense. Accrued interest and penalties are included in the related tax
liability line in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
The Company adjusts its reserves for tax positions in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax
audit, the refinement of an estimate based on new facts or changes in tax laws. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters
is different than the amounts recorded, the differences are recorded as adjustments to the provision for income taxes in the period in
which such determination is made. The provision (benefit) for income taxes includes the impact of reserve provisions and changes to
reserves that are considered appropriate.
The Company’s future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by changes in the valuation of the Company’s deferred tax
assets or liabilities, or changes in tax laws, regulations, accounting principles or interpretations thereof. In addition, the Company is
subject to examination of income tax returns by various tax authorities. The Company regularly assesses the likelihood of adverse
outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of its provisions for income taxes.
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures
(“ASU 2023-09”), which enhances income tax disclosure requirements, including (i) additional disaggregation of income tax
information and (ii) additional rate reconciliation disclosures, including specified categories and further disaggregation of items
meeting a quantitative threshold. The amendments in ASU 2023-09 are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15,
2024, and are to be applied prospectively (retrospective application is permitted). The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 effective
January 1, 2025, applied prospectively, and the required disclosures are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2025.
Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-04, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20):
Induced Conversions of Convertible Debt Instruments (“ASU 2024-04”), which clarifies the accounting for certain settlements of
convertible debt instruments as induced conversions versus extinguishments. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2025. The Company expects to adopt ASU 2024-04 on its required effective date and apply the guidance prospectively.
The Company does not expect adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense
Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (“ASU 2024-03”), which requires
disaggregation of certain expense captions into specified categories in disclosures within the footnotes to the financial statements. In
January 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-01 to clarify the effective date of ASU 2024-03 for all public business entities. The
amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods within
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied
prospectively; retrospective application is also permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact these ASUs will have on its
consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
83
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
During the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company
determined that property, plant and equipment was overstated as a result of the improper continued capitalization of carrying values of
assets committed to demolition in connection with the conversion of certain facilities from digital asset mining operations to high-
performance colocation infrastructure, which impacted the Company’s previously issued consolidated financial statements as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2024, as well as the condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2024, the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, the three months ended March 31, 2025, the three
and six months ended June 30, 2025 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025. Specifically, the carrying values of
assets committed to demolition were improperly capitalized rather than being written down to fair value through the recognition of
impairment charges in the periods in which the commitment to demolish was made.
The Company assessed the materiality of the errors, individually and in the aggregate, and concluded that the errors were
material to the previously issued consolidated financial statements and condensed consolidated statements set forth above and such
previously issued financial statements should no longer be relied upon. As a result, the Company has restated its previously issued
financial statements through the filing of an amended Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 and
amended Quarterly Reports on Forms 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2025, June 30, 2025, and September 30, 2025,
which are being filed concurrently with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
On January 16, 2024, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (the “Bankruptcy Court”) entered
an order confirming the Fourth Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Core Scientific, Inc. and certain of its affiliates (collectively, the
“Debtors”) (with technical modifications) (the “Plan of Reorganization”). On January 23, 2024 (the “Effective Date”), the conditions
to the effectiveness of the Plan of Reorganization were satisfied or waived and the Company emerged from bankruptcy. On January
24, 2024, the Company’s common shares began trading on Nasdaq under the ticker symbol “CORZ”.
On the Effective Date, the Company’s obligations under its notes sold pursuant to (i) the Secured Convertible Note Purchase
Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2021 (as amended, restated, amended and restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to
time) (the “Secured Convertible Notes”) and (ii) the Convertible Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 20, 2021 (as amended,
restated, amended and restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time) (the “Other Convertible Notes,” and together
with the Secured Convertible Notes, the “Convertible Notes”), as well as the replacement debtor-in-possession credit agreement and
substantially all other instruments directly or indirectly evidencing or creating any indebtedness or obligation of, or ownership interest
in, the Debtors giving rise to any claim or interest (except for instruments specifically reinstated pursuant to the Plan of
Reorganization), were canceled, and the duties and obligations of all parties thereto were deemed satisfied in full, canceled, released,
discharged, and of no force or effect.
On the Effective Date, pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization:
•The Company entered into a credit and guaranty agreement (the “Exit Credit Agreement”) providing for an $80 million first-
lien credit facility with certain holders of the Company’s Convertible Notes. The Exit Credit Agreement was paid in full on
August 19, 2024.
•The Company issued $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes due 2028 (the “Secured Notes”)
pursuant to a secured notes indenture (the “Secured Notes Indenture”). The Secured Notes were paid in full on August 19,
2024.
•The Company issued $260.0 million aggregate principal amount of secured convertible notes due 2029 (the “New Secured
Convertible Notes”) pursuant to a secured convertible notes indenture (the “New Secured Convertible Notes Indenture”). The
New Secured Convertible Notes were issued to holders of the Company’s Convertible Notes. The New Secured Convertible
Notes were mandatorily converted as of July 10, 2024, and are no longer outstanding.
•The Company entered into an agreement that provided for the issuance of contingent value rights (the “CVRs”) to holders of
the Company’s Convertible Notes and contingent value rights to holders of allowed general unsecured claims (the “GUC
CVRs”). On July 1, 2024, the GUC CVR obligations were extinguished pursuant to their terms when the volume-weighted
84
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
average price (“VWAP”) of the Company’s New Common Stock on Nasdaq exceeded $5.02 for 20 trading days within the
applicable 30 consecutive trading day period.
•Under the Plan of Reorganization, holders of the Company’s pre-emergence Secured Convertible Notes and Other
Convertible Notes received Secured Notes, New Secured Convertible Notes, post-emergence common stock and CVRs.
Certain holders of New Secured Convertible Notes also funded and received the Exit Credit Agreement.
See Notes 8 — Convertible and Other Notes Payable, 9 — Warrant Liabilities and Contingent Value Rights, and 13 —
Stockholders' Deficit for additional information about the Company’s emergence from bankruptcy.
Settlements
During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, settlements of claims with various entities were ordered by the
Bankruptcy Court and the satisfaction of those claims was recorded as Reorganization items, net in the Company’s consolidated
statements of operations.
In 2020, the Company entered into a master equipment finance agreement with NYDIG and received loans to finance the
Company’s acquisition of blockchain computing equipment (“NYDIG Loan”). On February 26, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court entered
an order approving a settlement with NYDIG which the Debtors agreed to transfer the miners serving as collateral under the NYDIG
Loan back to NYDIG over a period of several months in exchange for the full extinguishment of the NYDIG Loan. The final shipment
of miners serving as collateral under the NYDIG Loan occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2023, after which the NYDIG
Loan was extinguished in full and the Company recorded a $20.8 million gain on debt extinguishment in the Company’s consolidated
statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Reorganization items, net
Effective December 21, 2022, the date the Debtors filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code (the “Chapter 11 Cases”), the Company began to apply the provisions of ASC 852, Reorganizations (“ASC Topic 852”), which
is applicable to companies under bankruptcy protection and requires amendments to the presentation of certain financial statement line
items. ASC Topic 852 requires that the financial statements for periods including and after the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases
distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the business.
Expenses (including professional fees), realized gains and losses, and provisions for losses that can be directly associated with the
reorganization must be reported separately as Reorganization items, net in the consolidated statements of operations beginning
December 21, 2022, the petition date.
85
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, were as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, | |||
2024 | 2023 | ||
Professional fees and other bankruptcy related costs | $ | $ | |
Negotiated settlements | ( | ( | |
Satisfaction of allowed claims: | |||
Extinguishment of secured and other convertible notes | ( | ||
Extinguishment of miner equipment lender loans and leases | ( | ||
Satisfaction of general unsecured creditor claims | ( | ||
Satisfaction of cures and other claims | |||
Total satisfaction of allowed claims | ( | ||
Reimbursed claimant professional fees | |||
Debtor-in-possession financing costs | |||
Reorganization items, net | $( | $ | |
During the year ended December 31, 2024, there were significant reorganization related gains resulting primarily from
satisfaction of allowed claims under the Plan of Reorganization on the Effective Date and negotiated settlements, partially offset by
professional fees and other bankruptcy related costs. These reorganization related impacts were classified as Reorganization items, net
through the Effective Date. For the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, post-emergence bankruptcy advisory costs of
$1.8 million and $4.8 million, respectively, were recorded as Advisor fees in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | Estimated Useful Lives | |||
Land and improvements1 | $ | $ | |||
Building and improvements | |||||
Mining and network equipment | |||||
Electrical equipment | |||||
Other property, plant and equipment | |||||
Total | |||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | |||||
Total | |||||
Add: Construction in progress | |||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | $ | $ |
1 Estimated useful life of improvements. Land is not depreciated.
86
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Property, plant and equipment, net being leased to customers were immaterial as of December 31, 2024. As of December 31,
2025, property, plant and equipment, net being leased to customers consisted of the following (in thousands):
December 31, 2025 | |
Land and improvements | $ |
Building and improvements | |
Mining and network equipment | |
Electrical equipment | |
Other property, plant and equipment | |
Total | |
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | |
Property, plant and equipment, net leased to customers | $ |
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, was $68.1 million, $112.3 million, and
$95.7 million, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, $153.1 169.3
progress was placed into service.
During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company recognized impairment charges of $11.4 million and
$122.9 million, respectively, related to property, plant and equipment committed to demolition in connection with the conversion of
data center facilities from digital asset mining to high-density colocation operations. These charges represent the excess of the carrying
value of the identified assets over their estimated fair value. The fair value measurement date is the date on which the commitment to
demolish is made, which generally coincides with the execution of a colocation customer contract and commitment to site
redevelopment plans. Fair value was determined using a market approach based on estimated salvage and scrap proceeds for the
affected assets, which were determined to be nominal. These are non-recurring Level 3 fair value measurements, and the significant
unobservable input is the estimated salvage and scrap value of the affected assets, which was determined to be nominal. These charges
are presented as impairment of property, plant and equipment in the consolidated statements of operations. There were no other
indicators of impairment of long-lived asset groups for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
thousands):
December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | ||
Customer funding receivable | $ | $ | |
Other | |||
Total customer funding receivable and other current assets | $ | $ |
Customer funding receivable represents amounts due from our customer for construction related payables and accrued expenses
incurred on their behalf. The Company collects these amounts from the customer prior to payment to vendors. The net impact of the
account balance changes are reflected in the working capital components of the statement of cash flows. Obligations related to
customer items are paid soon after reimbursement. As of December 31, 2025, approximately $290.6 million of the related obligations
were included in accrued expenses and approximately $46.6 million were included in accounts payable.
87
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | ||
Accrued customer funded construction | $ | $ | |
Accrued capital expenditures | |||
Other | |||
Total accrued expenses | $ | $ |
December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | ||
Operating lease liabilities, net of current portion | |||
Other | |||
Total other noncurrent liabilities | $ | $ |
Lessee Accounting
thousands):
Financial statement line item | December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | ||||
Assets: | ||||||
Operating lease right-of-use assets | Operating lease right-of-use assets | $ | ||||
Finance lease right-of-use assets | Other noncurrent assets | $ | ||||
Liabilities: | ||||||
Operating lease liabilities, current portion | Other current liabilities | $ | ||||
Operating lease liabilities, net of current portion | Other noncurrent liabilities | $ | ||||
Finance lease liabilities, current portion | Other current liabilities | $ | ||||
Finance lease liabilities, net of current portion | Other noncurrent liabilities | $ |
88
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
Financial statement line item | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||
Operating lease expense | Cost of colocation services | $ | $ | $ | ||||
Operating lease expense | Cost of digital asset self-mining | |||||||
Operating lease expense | Cost of digital asset hosted mining services | |||||||
Operating lease expense | Selling, general and administrative | |||||||
Short-term lease expense | Cost of digital asset self-mining | |||||||
Variable lease expense | Cost of colocation services | |||||||
Finance lease expense: | ||||||||
Amortization of right-of-use assets | Cost of digital asset self-mining | |||||||
Interest on lease liabilities | Interest expense, net | |||||||
Total finance lease expense | ||||||||
Total lease expense | $ | $ | $ | |||||
December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | ||
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term (Years) | |||
Operating leases | |||
Finance leases | |||
Weighted Average Discount Rate | |||
Operating leases | |||
Finance leases |
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Lease Payments | |||||
Operating cash flows from operating leases | $ | $ | $ | ||
Operating cash flows from finance leases | $ | $ | $ | ||
Financing cash flows from finance leases | $ | $ | $ | ||
Supplemental Noncash Information | |||||
Finance lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations | $ | $ | $ | ||
Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations | $ | $ | $ | ||
Increase in operating right-of-use assets due to lease modification | $ | $ | $ | ||
89
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
follows at December 31, 2025, and thereafter (in thousands):
Operating Leases | Finance Leases | ||
2026 | $ | $ | |
2027 | |||
2028 | |||
2029 | |||
2030 | |||
Thereafter | |||
Total lease payments | |||
Less: imputed interest | |||
Total | $ | $ |
Lessor Accounting
We generate revenue by leasing property to a customer under licensing agreements. The manner in which we recognize these
transactions in our financial statements is described in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Revenue Recognition
— Colocation Segment. There was no lease revenue during the year ended December 31, 2023.
Year Ended December 31, | |||
2025 | 2024 | ||
Lease Revenue | |||
Operating lease revenue | $ | $ | |
Variable lease revenue | |||
Total lease revenue | $ | $ | |
and thereafter (in thousands):
Operating Leases1 | |
2026 | $ |
2027 | |
2028 | |
2029 | |
2030 | |
Thereafter | |
Total | $ |
1 Operating lease payments expected to be received excludes $8.17 billion in total future noncancellable minimum lease payments for operating leases that have not yet
90
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Stated Interest Rate | Effective Interest Rates | Maturities | December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | ||||
Convertible Notes: | ||||||||
2031 Convertible Notes | 2031 | $ | $ | |||||
2029 Convertible Notes | 2029 | |||||||
Equipment and Settlement: | ||||||||
Bremer loan | 2027 | |||||||
Didado note | 2027 | |||||||
HMC note | 2026 | |||||||
Harper note | 2026 | |||||||
Trilogy note | 2026 | |||||||
Other: | ||||||||
ACM note | 2025 | |||||||
Other | 2025 | |||||||
Notes payable | ||||||||
Less: Unamortized discounts | ||||||||
Total notes payable, net | ||||||||
Less: current portion1 | ||||||||
Convertible and other notes payable, net of current portion | $ | $ | ||||||
1 The current portion is included in Other current liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company fully repaid five higher-interest debt facilities, including the Bremer
loan, Didado note, HMC note, Harper note, and Trilogy note, totaling approximately $26.6 million in principal. The repayment
resulted in an aggregate of $1.4 million loss on debt extinguishment.
thousands):
Year Ended December 31, | |||
2025 | 2024 | ||
Coupon interest | $ | $ | |
Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs | $ | ||
Total | $ | $ | |
Convertible Notes | Other Notes Payable | ||
2026 | $ | $ | |
2027 | |||
2028 | |||
2029 | |||
2030 | |||
Thereafter | |||
Total | $ | $ |
91
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Convertible Notes
On December 5, 2024, the Company issued $625.0 million aggregate principal amount of 0.00 % Convertible Senior Notes due
2031 (the "2031 Convertible Notes"). The 2031 Convertible Notes mature on June 15, 2031, unless earlier converted, redeemed, or
repurchased. Noteholders may convert their 2031 Convertible Notes at their option only upon the occurrence of certain events,
including if the Company’s common stock price exceeds 130 % of the conversion price for a specified period or upon certain corporate
events. The Company may redeem the 2031 Convertible Notes, in whole or in part, at its option on or after June 22, 2028, subject to
certain conditions. Noteholders may require the Company to repurchase their 2031 Convertible Notes upon the occurrence of a
“Fundamental Change” (as defined in the 2031 Convertible Notes Indenture) or on December 15, 2027. The 2031 Convertible Notes
Indenture includes customary provisions relating to Events of Default, including payment defaults and certain bankruptcy or
insolvency events. The initial conversion rate is 44.4587 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 2031 Convertible
Notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $22.49 per share). The conversion rate is subject to adjustment upon
the occurrence of certain events. The net proceeds from the offering were approximately $608.7 million, after deducting the initial
purchasers’ discounts and commissions and the Company’s estimated offering expenses. The Company will recognize interest expense
on the 2031 Convertible Notes using the effective interest method over the term of the notes. The Company intends to use the net
proceeds for general corporate purposes.
On August 19, 2024, the Company issued $460.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.00 % Convertible Senior Notes due
2029 (the "2029 Convertible Notes"). The 2029 Convertible Notes mature on September 1, 2029, unless earlier converted, redeemed,
or repurchased. Noteholders may convert their 2029 Convertible Notes at their option only upon the occurrence of certain events,
including if the Company’s common stock price exceeds 130 % of the conversion price for a specified period or upon certain corporate
events. The Company may redeem the 2029 Convertible Notes, in whole or in part, at its option on or after September 7, 2027, subject
to certain conditions. Noteholders may require the Company to repurchase their 2029 Convertible Notes upon the occurrence of a
“Fundamental Change” (as defined in the 2029 Convertible Notes Indenture). The 2029 Convertible Notes Indenture includes
customary provisions relating to Events of Default, including payment defaults and certain bankruptcy or insolvency events. The
initial conversion rate is 90.9256 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 2029 Convertible Notes (equivalent to an
initial conversion price of approximately $11.00 per share). The conversion rate is subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of
certain events. The net proceeds from the offering were approximately $447.6 million, after deducting the initial purchasers’ discounts
and commissions and the Company’s estimated offering expenses. The Company will recognize interest expense on the 2029
Convertible Notes using the effective interest method over the term of the notes. The Company used approximately $62.0 million of
the net proceeds from the 2029 Convertible Notes Offering to repay in full the outstanding loans under the Exit Credit Agreement, of
which $0.8 million was paid for interest. Additionally, the Company used approximately $154.1 million of the net proceeds from the
2029 Convertible Notes Offering to redeem all of the outstanding Secured Notes, of which $4.1 million was paid for interest. The
Warrant Agreement
On the Effective Date and pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization and the Confirmation Order, the Company entered into a
warrant agreement (the “Warrant Agreement”) providing for the issuance of 98,313,313 warrants, each exercisable for one share of
New Common Stock at an exercise price of $6.81 per share (the “Tranche 1 Warrants”) and (ii) an aggregate of 81,927,898 warrants,
each exercisable for one share of New Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share (the “Tranche 2 Warrants” and, together
with the Tranche 1 Warrants, the “Warrants”).
Each whole Tranche 1 Warrant entitles the registered holder to purchase one whole share of New Common Stock at an exercise
price of $6.81 per share (the “Tranche 1 Exercise Price”). Each whole Tranche 2 Warrant entitles the registered holder to purchase one
whole share of New Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share at any time following the time the volume weighted
average price per share of New Common Stock equals or exceeds $8.72 per share on each trading day for 20 consecutive trading days
(the “Triggering Event”), which event occurred on July 11, 2024. The Tranche 1 and Tranche 2 Exercise Prices are subject to
adjustment for specific events as set forth in the Warrant Agreement. The Tranche 2 Warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis.
The Tranche 1 Warrants will expire on January 23, 2027, and the Tranche 2 Warrants will expire on January 23, 2029, in each
case, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the Warrant Agreement.
92
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
During the year ended December 31, 2025, 1.0 million Tranche 1 Warrants were exercised, which resulted in cash receipts of
$6.8 million. As of December 31, 2025, there were 96.7 million unexercised Tranche 1 Warrants.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, 12.9 million Tranche 2 Warrants were exercised, which resulted in cash receipts of
$0.1 million. As of December 31, 2025, there were 8.1 million unexercised Tranche 2 Warrants.
Contingent Value Rights Agreement
On the Effective Date, under the terms of the Plan of Reorganization, the Company entered into the Contingent Value Rights
Agreement and recorded the liabilities at fair value as of the Effective Date. Pursuant to the Contingent Value Rights Agreement, the
Company issued 51,783,625 CVRs to holders of the Company’s Convertible Notes who received New Common Stock (in such
capacity, the “Payees”) in an aggregate amount of 51,783,625 shares of New Common Stock (the “Corresponding New Common
Stock”). The CVRs require the Company to make payments to each Payee, of:
•(i) at the first testing date, cash equal to such Payee’s pro rata share (the “Year 1 Contingent Payment Obligation”) of the
lesser of (a) $43,333,333.33 and (b) the difference between (1) $260,000,000 and (2) the fair market value of the
Corresponding New Common Stock (the “First Anniversary Payment Amount”); provided that the Year 1 Contingent
Payment Obligation will be extinguished if the fair market value of the Corresponding New Common Stock is equal to or
in excess of $260,000,000 with respect to the first testing date; as of December 31, 2024, the fair market value of the
Corresponding New Common Stock was in excess of $260,000,000 . On January 23, 2025, the first testing date, the fair
market value of the Corresponding New Common Stock was in excess of $260,000,000 and the Year 1 Contingent
Payment Obligation was extinguished.
•(ii) at the second testing date, cash or New Common Stock (or a combination of cash and New Common Stock), in the
Company’s sole discretion, equal to such Payee’s pro rata share (the “Year 2 Contingent Payment Obligation”) of the
lesser of (a) $43,333,333.33 and (b) the difference between (1) $260,000,000 minus the First Anniversary Payment
Amount and (2) the fair market value of the Corresponding New Common Stock (the “Second Anniversary Payment
Amount”); provided that the Year 2 Contingent Payment Obligation will be extinguished if the fair market value of the
Corresponding New Common Stock is equal to or in excess of $260,000,000 minus the First Anniversary Payment
Amount, if any, with respect to the second testing date; and
•(iii) at the third testing date, cash or New Common Stock (or a combination of cash and New Common Stock), in the
Company’s sole discretion, equal to such Payee’s pro rata share (the “Year 3 Contingent Payment Obligation”) of the
lesser of (a) $43,333,333.33 and (b) the difference between (1) $260,000,000 minus the sum of the First Anniversary
Payment Amount and the Second Anniversary Payment Amount and (2) the fair market value of the Corresponding New
Common Stock (the “Third Anniversary Payment Amount”); provided that the Year 3 Contingent Payment Obligation
will be extinguished if the fair market value of the Corresponding New Common Stock is equal to or in excess of
$260,000,000 minus (1) the First Anniversary Payment amount, if any and (2) the Second Anniversary Payment
Amount, if any, with respect to the third testing date.
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants at the measurement date. To increase the comparability of fair value measures, the following hierarchy prioritizes
the inputs to valuation methodologies used to measure fair value:
Level 1 — Valuations based on quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 — Valuations based on observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar
assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other
inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 — Valuations based on unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions, consistent with reasonably
available assumptions made by other market participants. These valuations require significant judgment.
The Company uses observable market data when determining fair value whenever possible and relies on unobservable inputs
only when observable market data is not available.
93
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
initially and subsequently measured at fair value with changes in fair value reflected in Net loss. When these instruments were
recognized on the Effective Date, observable market data was not available. As of December 31, 2025, observable Level 1 market data
was available for the CVRs and Warrants.
On the Effective Date, the CVRs and GUC CVRs were recognized at their fair value of $86.3
December 31, 2024, a decrease in fair value of $82.1 million was included in Change in fair value of warrant and contingent value
rights on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. During the year ended December 31, 2025, a decrease in fair value of
CVRs of $0.9 million was included in Change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights in the Company’s consolidated
statements of operations.
On the Effective Date, the warrants were recognized at their fair value of $345.9 million. During the year ended December 31,
2024, an increase in fair value of $1.45 billion was included in Change in fair value of warrant and contingent value rights on the
Company’s consolidated statements of operations. During the year ended December 31, 2025, an increase in fair value of Warrants of
$34.0 million was included in Change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights in the Company’s consolidated statements
of operations.
recurring basis as of December 31, 2025 (in thousands):
Fair Value Hierarchy | |||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Fair value | ||||
Assets: | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | |||||||
Money market funds | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||
Digital assets | |||||||
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||
Liabilities: | |||||||
Contingent value rights1 | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||
Warrants | |||||||
Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||
1 The fair value of contingent value rights is included within Other current liabilities and Other noncurrent liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets,
based on the expected timing of settlement.
94
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following presents the levels of the fair value hierarchy for the Company's assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis as of December 31, 2024 (in thousands):
Fair Value Hierarchy | |||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Fair value | ||||
Assets: | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | |||||||
Money market funds | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||
Digital assets | |||||||
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||
Liabilities: | |||||||
Contingent value rights1 | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||
Warrants | |||||||
Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||
1 The fair value of contingent value rights is included within Other current liabilities and Other noncurrent liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets,
based on the expected timing of settlement.
Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value
The Convertible Notes are recorded at amortized cost in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The fair value is disclosed
for informational purposes only in accordance with ASC Topic 825-10, Financial Instruments, and is determined using trading
activity in over-the-counter markets. The following tables present the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Convertible
Notes as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 (in thousands):
December 31, 2025
Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Fair Value Hierarchy | ||||
$ | $ | Level 1 | ||||
$ | $ | Level 1 |
December 31, 2024
Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Fair Value Hierarchy | ||||
$ | $ | Level 1 | ||||
$ | $ | Level 1 |
Level 2 Recurring Fair Value Measurements
In October 2023, the Company entered into an energy forward purchase contract to fix a specified component of the energy
price related to forecasted energy purchases at the Pecos, Texas facility from November 1, 2023 through May 31, 2024 (the “Energy
Derivatives”). The energy forward purchase contract is not designated as a hedging instrument for accounting. The Energy Derivatives
are recognized as derivatives in accordance with ASC Topic 815 initially and subsequently measured at fair value with changes in
value reflected in Net loss. The Company measures the fair value of its energy forward purchase contract using the discounted cash
flow model and uses Intercontinental Exchange forward curves and risk-free rates as observable market inputs.
95
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
statements of operations (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||
Financial statement line item | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Energy forward purchase contract | Decrease in fair value of energy derivatives | $ | $ | $ | ||
The Company’s non-financial assets, including property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets (other than digital assets)
are measured at estimated fair value on a nonrecurring basis and are adjusted only upon impairment or when held for sale. Prior to the
adoption of ASU 2023-08, digital assets were subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments only when impairment was recognized.
Refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 5 — Property, Plant, and Equipment, for more information
regarding fair value considerations when measuring impairment.
No non-financial assets were classified as Level 3 as of December 31, 2025 or December 31, 2024.
The Company’s financial instruments, that are not subject to recurring fair value measurements, include cash and cash
equivalents (other than money market funds), restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, leases, notes payable and certain
accrued expenses and other liabilities. Except for the 2029 Convertible Notes and 2031 Convertible Notes, the carrying amount of
Commitments
As of December 31, 2025, the Company was contractually committed approximately $989.8 million of capital expenditures,
primarily related to infrastructure modifications, equipment procurement, and labor associated with the conversion of a significant
portion of our data centers to deliver high-density colocation services to customers. Of this amount, $716.8 million will be passed
through to the Company’s customer as invoiced and $30.1 million will be funded by the customer as prepaid base license fees for the
Colocation segment. These capital expenditures are expected to occur within the next 12 to 24 months.
Subsequent to December 31, 2025, and through February 26, 2026, the Company contractually committed for an additional
$418.1 million of capital expenditures. Of this amount, $107.4 million will be passed through to the Company’s customer as invoiced.
Legal Proceedings
The Company is subject to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company accrues losses for a legal
proceeding when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. However, the
uncertainties inherent in legal proceedings make it difficult to reasonably estimate the costs and effects of resolving these matters.
Accordingly, actual costs incurred may differ materially from amounts accrued and could materially adversely affect the Company’s
business, cash flows, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Unless otherwise indicated, the Company is unable to
estimate reasonably possible losses in excess of any amounts accrued.
Purported Shareholder Class Action (“Pang”)
On November 14, 2022, Plaintiff Mei Pang filed a purported class-action complaint against Core Scientific, Inc., its former
chief executive officer, Michael Levitt, and others in the United States District Court, Western District (Austin) of Texas asserting that
the Company violated the Securities Act and Exchange Act by allegedly failing to disclose to investors that among other things the
Company was vulnerable to litigation given its decision to pass power costs to its customers, that certain clients had breached their
contracts, and that this impacted the Company’s profitability and ability to continue as a going concern. The complaint seeks monetary
damages. Core filed a notice of suggestion of bankruptcy stating that its petition for bankruptcy—filed on December 21, 2022—
operates as a stay to the continuation of this matter. Plaintiff subsequently withdrew its claims against Core. A lead plaintiff was
appointed in April 2023 and proofs of claim were filed in the Company’s Chapter 11 Cases. After the Company filed its motion to
dismiss and a subsequent motion for consideration with respect to remaining claims not dismissed, all remaining claims in the
complaint against the individual defendants were subsequently dismissed without prejudice in April 2024.
96
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
On December 7, 2023, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas in Houston, sustained the
Company’s objection to the filed class proof of claim without prejudice to re-file a proof of claim on an individual basis by December
20, 2023; and denied plaintiff’s Motion for Class Treatment under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7023. No individual proof of claim was filed by
any of the class representatives of the purported class action by December 20, 2023, and a separately filed objection to confirmation of
Debtors’ Fourth Amended Chapter 11 Plan and Disclosure Statement was overruled by the Bankruptcy Court on January 16, 2024. On
January 29, 2024, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal of the order confirming the Company’s Plan of Reorganization.
On June 7, 2024, Plaintiff refiled its complaint asserting that the individual defendants violated the Securities Exchange Act by
allegedly failing to disclose to investors that among other things the Company failed to disclose known trends or uncertainties that
would have an impact on the Company’s financial performance. The Company’s motion to dismiss the refiled complaint is pending
with the United States District Court in Austin, Texas.
On March 7, 2025, the United States District Court for the Western District (Austin) of Texas referred Plaintiff's complaint to
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas in Houston for determination of the issues raised by the
Company's motion to dismiss, dismissed without prejudice Company's motion to dismiss as moot and administratively closed the case.
On March 19, 2025, the United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of Texas Houston Division dismissed Plaintiff's appeal of
the order confirming the Company's Plan of Reorganization as it related to the Plaintiffs as moot in light of the administrative closure
of the securities case brought by the Plaintiffs in the United States District Court Western District of Texas. On April 2, 2025, the
Plaintiff's filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the orders entered in each of the United States District Court for the Southern District
of Texas Houston Division and the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (Austin) and the Company filed its
motions opposing each of Plaintiff’s motions for reconsideration.
Shareholder Class Action (“Ihle”)
On July 24, 2023, Plaintiff Brad Ihle filed a class action complaint against certain officers and directors of Power & Digital
Infrastructure Acquisition Corp. (the former name of the current corporate entity operating our business, or “XPDI”) and XMS
Sponsor LLC et al, in the Court of Chancery State of Delaware. The complaint alleges breach of fiduciary duties arising out of the
merger of XPDI and the entity that conducted our business operations prior to the merger and the marketing and solicitation of
shareholders pursuant to that merger agreement dated July 20, 2021. Certain of the defendants have notified the Company of their
intention to seek defense and indemnification in this matter pursuant to Delaware law and the Company’s bylaws. The matter was
settled during the quarter ended December 31, 2025, with the Company’s payment in satisfaction of its existing indemnification
obligation. This payment is reflected in the Loss on legal settlements in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
Patent Infringement Claim
Malikie Innovations Ltd and Key Patents Innovations Ltd. (“Malikie”), filed suit in the United States District Court Eastern
District of Texas Marshall Division against Core Scientific, Inc. (the “Company”) alleging infringement in the Company’s bitcoin
mining business of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,788,827; 10,284,370; 8,666,062; 7,372,960; and 8,532,286. On July 20, 2025 the Company
filed a motion to dismiss the claims on the basis that the patents are invalid under 35 U.S.C §101 and on July 25, 2025 the Company
filed a motion to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (Austin). On November 14,
2025 Malikie filed a motion to amend the complaint to add allegations of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,712,039 by the
Company’s bitcoin mining business and its high performance computing business. Malikie also asserted infringement of the
previously asserted 8,532,286 patent against the Company’s high performance computing business. All motions are pending. The
court set a trial date of January 25, 2027.
As of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, there were no
Leases—See Note 7 — Leases for additional information.
Current income tax expense represents the amount expected to be reported on the Company’s income tax returns, and deferred
tax expense or benefit represents the change in net deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined
based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted tax rates that
will be in effect when these differences reverse. Valuation allowances are recorded as appropriate to reduce deferred tax assets to the
amount considered likely to be realized. The Company had $0.6 million, $0.9 million, and $0.7 million of income tax expense, for the
years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
97
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Year Ended December 31, | |
2025 | |
Domestic | $( |
Foreign | |
Total | $( |
The income tax expense and effective income tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 were as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Current tax: | |||||
Federal | $ | $ | $ | ||
State | |||||
Total current tax | |||||
Deferred tax: | |||||
Federal | |||||
State | |||||
Total deferred tax | |||||
Total income tax expense | $ | $ | $ | ||
Year Ended December 31, | |
2025 | |
Federal | $ |
State | |
North Carolina | ( |
Texas | |
Other State | |
Total State | |
Foreign | |
Total income taxes paid | $ |
98
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
presented (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, | |||
2024 | 2023 | ||
U.S. federal statutory income tax benefit applied to loss before income taxes | $( | $( | |
State income taxes, net of federal benefit | |||
Stock compensation | |||
Non-deductible interest | |||
Fair value adjustment - convertible notes | |||
Reorganization costs | |||
Valuation allowance | ( | ( | |
Other permanent items | |||
Total income tax expense (benefit) | $ | $ | |
The reconciliation between the U.S. statutory tax rate and the Company’s effective tax is presented as follows for the period
presented (in thousands, except percentages):
Year Ended December 31, 2025 | |||
US Federal statutory income tax rate | $( | ||
State and local income taxes, net of federal effect1 | ( | ||
Change in valuation allowance | ( | ||
Nontaxable and nondeductible items | |||
Fair value adjustment - convertible notes | ( | ||
Stock compensation | ( | ||
Cancellation of debt income | ( | ||
Other non-deductible items | ( | ||
Tax credits | ( | ||
Deferred tax adjustments | ( | ||
Worldwide changes in unrecognized tax benefits | ( | ||
Other | ( | ||
Total | $ | ( | |
1 State and local income taxes in Texas comprise the majority of the state and local income taxes, net of federal effect category.
99
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Deferred tax assets: | |||||
Net operating loss carryforward | $ | $ | $ | ||
Capital loss carryforward | |||||
Deferred interest carryforward | |||||
Research tax credit carryforward | |||||
Reserves and accruals | |||||
Stock-based compensation | |||||
Derivatives | |||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | |||||
Digital asset impairment loss | |||||
Debt extinguishment loss | |||||
Intangibles (other than goodwill) | |||||
Leases | |||||
Capitalized research and development expenses | |||||
Other | |||||
Gross deferred tax assets | |||||
Valuation allowance | ( | ( | ( | ||
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance | |||||
Deferred tax liabilities: | |||||
Deferred revenue | ( | ( | |||
Operating lease ROU assets | ( | ( | ( | ||
Deferred tax liabilities, net | ( | ( | ( | ||
Total net deferred tax assets (liabilities) | $ | $ | $ | ||
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | $ | $ | ||
Change related to current net operating losses and impairments | ( | ||||
Change related to deferred tax adjustments | ( | ( | |||
Change related to prior period adjustments | ( | ||||
Change related to restructuring | ( | ||||
Balance at end of period | $ | $ | $ | ||
Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income, if any, the timing and amount of
which are uncertain. The assessment regarding whether a valuation allowance is required on deferred tax assets considers the
evaluation of both positive and negative evidence when concluding whether it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets are
realizable. After reviewing the positive and negative evidence available, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance of
$275.5 million. The valuation allowance primarily relates to deferred tax assets for fixed assets, deferred interest carryforwards, net
operating loss carryforwards and capital loss carryforwards.
As of December 31, 2025, the Company has federal and state net operating loss carryforwards in the amount of $727.8 million
and $184.2 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2024, the Company has federal and state net operating loss carryforwards in the
amount of $312.4 million and $128.1 million, respectively. The federal net operating loss can be carried forward indefinitely, however
100
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
the utilization of the federal net operating loss for a tax year is equal to the lesser of (1) the aggregate of the net operating loss
carryovers to such year, plus the net operating carrybacks to such tax year, or (2) 80% of taxable income determined without regard to
the deduction. The Company's state net operating loss carryforwards expiration periods range from 2035 to indefinite. As of December
31, 2025, the Company had U.S. federal and state capital loss carryforwards of $220.7 million and $47.8 million, respectively. The
capital loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2027.
In addition, the Company's net operating loss and research and development credits may be subject to utilization limitations due
to changes of control, as defined by tax law under Internal Revenue Code Sections 382. Similar provisions may subject the capital loss
carryforwards to utilization limitation.
The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (“OBBBA”) enacted on July 4, 2025, introduced notable changes to the U.S. Internal
Revenue Code, including immediate expensing of domestic Section 174 costs. Section 174 costs are expenditures, which represent
research and development costs that are incident to the development or improvement of a product, process, formula, invention,
computer software, or technique. As previously required under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, we capitalized research and development
expenditures in the years ended December 31, 2022 through December 31, 2024. With the enactment of OBBBA, we began deducting
domestic Section 174 costs in 2025. As of December 31, 2025, we have a deferred tax asset of $3.6 million related to capitalized
Section 174 expenditures.
The Company also has net research and development credit carryforwards of $2.7 million and $1.9 million as of December 31,
2025 and 2024, respectively, which are available to reduce future tax liabilities.
Accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded as income tax expense. The Company continues
to believe its positions are supportable; however, due to uncertainties in any tax audit outcome, the Company's estimates of the
ultimate settlement of uncertain tax positions may change and the actual tax benefits may differ from the estimates.
thousands);
Year Ended December 31, | |||
2025 | 2024 | ||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | $ | |
Gross increases to tax positions in current periods | |||
Balance at end of period | $ | $ | |
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal and various state jurisdictions. The Company’s 2021 through 2025 tax
years are subject to U.S. federal and state examination.
Emergence from Bankruptcy
On the Effective Date, the Plan of Reorganization became effective in accordance with its terms and the Debtors emerged from
the Chapter 11 Cases. On the Effective Date, in connection with the effectiveness of, and pursuant to the terms of, the Plan of
Reorganization and the Confirmation Order, the Company’s common stock outstanding immediately before the Effective Date was
canceled and is of no further force or effect, and the new organizational documents of the Company became effective, authorizing the
issuance of shares of common stock, par value $0.00001 per share (the “New Common Stock”). In accordance with the foregoing, on
the Effective Date, the Company, as reorganized on the Effective Date and in accordance with the Plan of Reorganization, issued the:
(i) New Common Stock, (ii) Warrants, (iii) CVRs, (iv) New Secured Convertible Notes, (v) Secured Notes and (vi) the GUC CVRs.
Such securities, rights, or interests were issued in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) provided by section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code.
On the Effective Date, all equity interests in the Company that existed immediately prior to the Effective Date were cancelled,
including the Company’s then-existing common stock and warrants, and the Company issued or caused to be issued the New Common
Stock in accordance with the terms of the Plan of Reorganization.
On the Effective Date, pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, the Company issued or held in reserve as issuable:
101
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
•176,266,782 shares of New Common Stock;
•4,725,091 shares of New Common Stock held in reserve for disputed claims;
•180,241,211 Warrants, composed of 98,313,313 Tranche 1 Warrants and 81,927,898 Tranche 2 Warrants;
•51,783,625 CVRs; and
•GUC CVRs.
See Notes 4 — Emergence from Bankruptcy and 9 — Warrant Liabilities and Contingent Value Rights for additional
information on Warrants, CVRs and GUC CVRs.
New Common Stock and Preferred Stock
The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000,000 shares of New Common Stock and 2,000,000,000 shares of preferred stock
(the “Preferred Stock”), each having a par value of $0.00001
all times be subject to the rights of the Preferred Stock as may be set forth in one or more certificates of designations filed with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware from time to time in accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law and the
Charter.
The Charter authorized the Board of Directors to provide for the issuance of a share or shares of Preferred Stock in one or more
series and to fix for each such series (i) the number of shares constituting such series and the designation of such series, (ii) the voting
powers (if any) of the shares of such series, (iii) the powers, preferences, and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of
the shares of each such series, and (iv) the qualifications, limitations, and restrictions thereof. The authority of the Board of Directors
with respect to the Preferred Stock shall include, but not be limited to, determination of (i) the number of shares constituting any
series, (ii) the dividend rate or rates on the shares of any series, (iii) the voting rights, if any, of such series and the number of votes per
share, (iv) conversion privileges, (v) whether the shares of any series shall be redeemable, (vi) whether any series shall have a sinking
fund for the redemption or purchase of shares of such series, (vii) the rights of the shares in the event of voluntary or involuntary
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company and (viii) any other powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and
restrictions of any series.
Incentive Plan
The Company adopted an equity-based management incentive plan on April 26, 2024 (the “Incentive Plan”). The Incentive
Plan provides for the grant of non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units,
performance awards, dividend equivalent rights and other stock-based awards.
The Incentive Plan, was amended and restated on May 12, 2025 to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance from
the Incentive Plan, and limits the aggregate compensation that may be paid to the Company’s non-employee directors in respect of any
single fiscal year (including awards under the Incentive Plan) to a total of $800,000 .
The form of outstanding grants under the Incentive Plan currently includes RSUs and MSUs. The participants in the Incentive
Plan, the timing and allocations of the awards to participants, and the other terms and conditions of such awards (including, but not
limited to, vesting, exercise prices, base values, hurdles, forfeiture, repurchase rights and transferability) is determined by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors in its discretion, as plan administrator.
Under the Incentive Plan, certain executives have been granted MSUs which are subject to the achievement of market-based
share price goals and the executives’ continued service until the relevant vesting date. The number of shares which vest as of the end
of each measurement period on each vesting date are conditioned on the highest 20 -day volume weighted average price of the
Company's share price achieved during the tranche’s measurement vesting period since grant. The MSU vesting schedule is
proportionate over a three-year service period where such proportions are identified as tranches with separate service conditions and
measurement periods for the market conditions. If certain market-based share price goals are not met during certain tranche
measurement periods, the ability to satisfy such goals apply in subsequent measurement periods and permit vesting if such market
conditions are then met (and the service conditions are then satisfied). The following table presents additional information relating to
each MSU award:
102
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Share Price Goal | Incremental Units | Tranche Cumulative Units | ||
December 31, 2025 Vesting: | ||||
$ | ||||
$ | ||||
$ | ||||
$ | ||||
$ | ||||
$ | ||||
December 31, 2026 Vesting: | ||||
$ | ||||
$ | ||||
$ | ||||
$ | ||||
$ | ||||
$ |
Performance Share Units
In April 2025, the Company granted PSUs to certain executive officers under the Incentive Plan. The PSUs are eligible to vest
in three equal installments on April 15, 2026, March 15, 2027, and March 15, 2028, subject to satisfaction of the service condition and
the achievement of three separate market or performance conditions during the respective performance measurement period (for a total
of nine tranches). The performance measurement period is generally the calendar year preceding each vesting date. The number of
shares earned at each vesting date range from 0 % to 300 % of target based on measures of satisfaction of the market or performance
condition for each tranche. Market conditions include RTSR metric, which is a measure of the performance of the Company’s own
stock relative to the Russell 2000. Performance conditions include aggregate energized MW growth and colocation customer
acquisition targets.
The grant date fair value of the PSU tranches with RTSR market conditions were estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation
model. The following assumptions were used to determine the grant date fair value:
Year Ended December 31, 2025 | |
Expected term of awards in years | |
Expected volatility | |
Risk-free interest rate | |
Expected dividend yield |
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock Options—Stock options granted under the 2018 Plan were granted at a price per share not less than the fair value at the
date of grant. Options granted vest over 4 years and are exercisable for up to 10 years. No
ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. As of December 31, 2025, stock options outstanding and exercisable are immaterial, and the total
unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested stock options is immaterial .
Restricted Stock Units — RSUs granted in 2025 and 2024 generally vest over a 3-year service period.
Market Condition Restricted Stock Units — See “Incentive Plan” above for the vesting conditions of the MSUs.
103
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
per share amounts):
Restricted Stock Units | Market Condition Restricted Stock Units | Performance & Market Condition Restricted Stock Units | |||||||||
Number of Shares | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value | Number of Shares | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value | Number of Shares | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value | ||||||
Unvested - December 31, 2024 | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||
Granted | |||||||||||
Vested | ( | ( | |||||||||
Forfeited | ( | ( | |||||||||
Unvested - December 31, 2025 | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||
expected to be recognized for each award type were as follows (in thousands):
Unrecognized Compensation Cost | Weighted-Average Recognition Period | ||
RSUs | $ | ||
PSUs | |||
MSUs | |||
Total | $ |
consolidated statements of operations as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Cost of revenue | $ | $ | $ | ||
Colocation organizational and site startup costs | |||||
Selling, general and administrative | |||||
Stock-based compensation expense, net of amounts capitalized1 | |||||
Capitalized stock-based compensation2 | |||||
Total stock-based compensation cost | $ | $ | $ | ||
1 The year ended December 31, 2025, includes $3.0 million of stock-based compensation expense as a result of accelerated vesting of outstanding
RSUs for former board members.
2 Represents the amounts of stock-based compensation capitalized to property, plant, and equipment.
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is measured as the income or loss available to common stockholders divided by the weighted
average common shares outstanding for the period. Upon exercise of the Tranche 2 Warrants, shares are issuable for little or no
consideration, sometimes referred to as “penny warrants”. Under ASC 260-10-45-13, those issuable shares are considered outstanding
in the computation of basic EPS whether or not related warrants have been exercised. At December 31, 2025, approximately
outstanding shares used for the computation of basic EPS for the year then ended.
The basic EPS numerator excludes changes in the fair value of the Tranche 2 Warrants recognized in net loss during periods in
which the warrants were exercisable. Accordingly, changes in fair value recognized from the close of trading on July 11, 2024 through
104
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2024, as well as for the year ended December 31, 2025, have been eliminated from net loss for purposes of calculating
basic EPS. Changes in fair value recognized prior to July 11, 2024 remain included in net loss for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Diluted EPS includes and presents the dilutive effect on EPS from the potential issuance of shares from unvested restricted
stock units, conversion of convertible securities, or the exercise of options and/or warrants. The potentially dilutive effect of
convertible securities are calculated using the if-converted method. The potentially dilutive effect of options or warrants are computed
using the treasury stock method. When potentially dilutive securities have an anti-dilutive effect (i.e., increase income per share or
decrease loss per share), they are excluded from the diluted EPS calculation.
share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Numerator: | |||||
Net loss | $( | $( | $( | ||
Add: Change in fair value of Tranche 2 Warrants | |||||
Basic and diluted net loss | $( | $( | $( | ||
Denominator: | |||||
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted | |||||
Net loss per share - basic and diluted | $( | $( | $( | ||
dilutive. Shares which may be issued from potentially dilutive securities are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Tranche 1 Warrants | |||||
Convertible Notes | |||||
RSUs, PSUs, and MSUs | |||||
Stock options | |||||
Warrants | |||||
SPAC Vesting Shares | |||||
Total shares issuable from potentially dilutive securities | |||||
The Company’s operating segments are aggregated into reportable segments only if they exhibit similar economic
characteristics and have similar business activities.
The Company has three
customers employing AI and HPC related workloads. The Company’s Colocation operations met the criteria to be considered a new
segment during the second quarter of 2024. During fiscal year 2024, our “Colocation” segment was referred to as “HPC Hosting.”;
“Digital Asset Self-Mining”, consisting of performing digital asset mining for its own account; and “Digital Asset Hosted Mining”,
consisting of providing hosting services to third-parties for digital asset mining. The Colocation operation generates revenue through
licensing agreements and orders with licensees that include fixed and variable payments on a recurring basis. The Digital Asset Self-
Mining segment generates revenue from operating owned digital infrastructure and computer equipment as part of a pool of users that
process transactions conducted on one or more blockchain networks. In exchange for these services, the Company receives digital
assets. The Digital Asset Hosted Mining business generates revenue through the sale of consumption-based contracts for its digital
asset hosted mining services which are recurring in nature.
105
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company’s Chief Executive Officer is the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”). The CODM uses gross profit to
evaluate performance and allocate resources. Gross profit is used to evaluate actual results against expectations, which are based on
comparable prior results, current budget, and current forecast. Gross profit is also used in deciding how profits and cash flows will be
reinvested or otherwise deployed. The CODM does not evaluate performance or allocate resources based on segment asset or liability
information; accordingly, the Company has not presented a measure of assets by segment. The segments’ accounting policies are the
same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company excludes certain operating expenses and
other expenses from the allocations to operating segments.
106
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
(in thousands, except percentages) Colocation Segment | |||||
Colocation revenue: | |||||
License fees | $ | $ | $ | ||
Power fees passed through to customer | |||||
Maintenance and other | |||||
Total colocation revenue | |||||
Cost of colocation services: | |||||
Power fees passed through to customer | |||||
Depreciation expense | |||||
Employee compensation | |||||
Facility operations expense | |||||
Other segment items | |||||
Total cost of colocation services | |||||
Colocation gross profit | $ | $ | $ | ||
Colocation gross margin | |||||
Digital Asset Self-Mining Segment | |||||
Digital asset self-mining revenue | $ | $ | $ | ||
Cost of digital asset self-mining: | |||||
Power fees | |||||
Depreciation expense | |||||
Employee compensation | |||||
Facility operations expense | |||||
Other segment items | |||||
Total cost of digital asset self-mining | $ | ||||
Digital Asset Self-Mining gross profit | $ | $ | $ | ||
Digital Asset Self-Mining gross margin | |||||
Digital Asset Hosted Mining Segment | |||||
Digital asset hosted mining revenue from customers | $ | $ | $ | ||
Cost of digital asset hosted mining services: | |||||
Power fees | |||||
Depreciation expense | |||||
Employee compensation | |||||
Facility operations expense | |||||
Other segment items | |||||
Total cost of digital asset hosted mining services | $ | ||||
Digital Asset Hosted Mining gross profit | $ | $ | $ | ||
Digital Asset Hosted Mining gross margin | |||||
Consolidated | |||||
Consolidated total revenue | $ | $ | $ | ||
Consolidated cost of revenue | $ | $ | $ | ||
Consolidated gross profit | $ | $ | $ | ||
Consolidated gross margin | |||||
107
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, is as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Reportable segment gross profit | $ | $ | $ | ||
Decrease in fair value of digital assets | |||||
Gain from sale of digital assets | ( | ||||
Impairment of digital assets | |||||
Decrease in fair value of energy derivatives | |||||
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment | |||||
Impairment of property, plant and equipment | |||||
Colocation organizational and site startup costs | |||||
Advisor fees | |||||
Selling, general and administrative | |||||
Operating (loss) income | ( | ( | |||
Non-operating expenses (income), net: | |||||
Loss (gain) on debt extinguishment | ( | ||||
Interest (income) expense, net | ( | ||||
Change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights | |||||
Reorganization items, net | ( | ||||
Loss on legal settlements | |||||
Other non-operating expense (income), net | ( | ( | |||
Total non-operating expense, net | |||||
Loss before income taxes | $( | $( | $( | ||
Concentrations of Revenue and Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash
equivalents and accounts receivable. Credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is concentrated with a small number of customers.
The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with major financial institutions, which management assesses to be of high credit
quality, in order to limit the exposure to credit risk. As of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, all of the Company’s fixed
assets were located in the United States. For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, all of the Company’s revenue was
generated in the United States. For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, 72 %, 80 %, and 78 %, respectively, of the
Company’s total revenue was generated from digital asset mining of bitcoin from one customer. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024,
substantially all of our digital assets were held by one
108
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Company’s Colocation, Digital Asset Self-Mining, and Digital Asset Hosted Mining segment revenue were as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||
Percent of Colocation segment revenue: | Percent of Digital Asset Self-Mining segment revenue: | Percent of Digital Asset Hosted Mining segment revenue: | |||||||||||||||
Customer | |||||||||||||||||
F1 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||
G | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||
H | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
J | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
L | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
1 On the Effective Date, Customer F became a minority shareholder of the Company.
109
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Supplemental disclosure of other cash flow information: | |||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | $ | $ | ||
Income tax payments (refunds) | $ | $( | $( | ||
Cash paid for reorganization items | $ | $ | $ | ||
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities: | |||||
Purchases of PP&E in accounts payable and accrued expense | $ | $ | $ | ||
Noncash exercise of warrants | |||||
Reclass of other current and non-current assets to plant, property, and equipment | |||||
Reduction in plant, property, and equipment basis related to Bitmain purchase | ( | ||||
Increase in right-of-use assets due to lease commencement | |||||
Increase in lease liability and right-of-use assets due to lease modification | |||||
Extinguishment of convertible notes upon emergence | ( | ||||
Extinguishment of accounts payable, accrued expenses, finance lease liability, and notes payable upon emergence | ( | ||||
Cancellation of common stock in connection with emergence | ( | ||||
Issuance of new common stock in connection with emergence | |||||
Issuance of new common stock for Bitmain obligation | |||||
Issuance of new common stock for the Equity Rights Offering backstop commitment | |||||
Issuance of contingent value rights | |||||
Issuance of warrants | |||||
Issuance of New Secured Convertible Notes | |||||
Issuance of Secured Notes, net of discount | |||||
Issuance of Exit Credit Agreement including $ | |||||
Issuance of miner equipment lender facility loans | |||||
Issuance of notes related to settlement | |||||
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASU 2023-08, Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets | |||||
Issuance of new common stock for PIK interest on New Secured Convertible Notes | |||||
Issuance of new common stock for New Secured Convertible Notes conversion | |||||
Property, plant and equipment disposed of through settlements | |||||
Purchase of insurance policies financed by short-term note payable | |||||
Decrease in equipment related to debt extinguishment | |||||
Decrease in notes payable in exchange for equipment | ( | ||||
There were no related party transactions during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. During the year ended December
31, 2023. the Company had entered into various transactions with related parties in the ordinary course of business.
The Company previously had agreements to provide digital asset hosted services to various entities that are managed and
invested in by individuals that were directors and executives of the Company. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company
recognized digital asset hosted revenue from the contracts with these entities of $10.1 million.
110
Core Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Subsequent to December 31, 2025 and through February 26, 2026, the Company sold 1,924 bitcoin for aggregate proceeds of
$175.9 million.
In January 2026, the Company entered into a long-term power supply arrangement under which the Company is obligated to
purchase firm utility power capacity beginning in 2028. In connection with this arrangement, the Company made a cash deposit of
$80 million into a restricted, interest-bearing escrow account, subject to contractual terms, including termination provisions.
111
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, have conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2025.
Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31,
2025, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to the material weakness in internal control over financial
reporting described below.
Per Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), the term disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures of an
issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the
Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s
rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principle executive and principle financial officers, or persons performing
similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable
assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Our management recognizes that any control system, no matter how well
designed and operated, will not prevent all errors and all fraud due to inherent limitations of internal controls. Because of such
limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over
financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible
to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Rule 13a-15(f) or Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Our management, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2025. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria established in the Internal
Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the
“COSO Framework”). Based upon this evaluation, our management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2025, our internal control
over financial reporting was not effective due to the material weakness described below.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
(1)pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the company;
(2)provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and
(3)provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there
is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected
on a timely basis. Management identified the following material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2025:
112
We did not effectively operate controls to account for intended demolition of building and infrastructure assets, including
evaluation of impairment, related to the conversion of facilities from digital asset mining operations to HPC colocation infrastructure
due to insufficient complement of trained personnel.
This material weakness resulted in material misstatements to property, plant and equipment on the consolidated balance sheet
and impairment of property, plant and equipment on the consolidated statement of operations, which were corrected prior to the
issuance of the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025, however, resulted in the restatement
of previously issued annual and interim financial statements. The control deficiency described above created a reasonable possibility
that a material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis, we concluded
the deficiency represents a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and our internal control over financial
reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2025.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, who audited the consolidated financial statements included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K, issued an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting. KPMG LLP’s report appears on page 111 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Remediation Plan for the Material Weakness
With the oversight of senior management and the Audit Committee, we are in the process of developing and implementing a
remediation plan to address the material weakness. Elements of the plan include the following:
•implementing additional training for accounting personnel on the evaluation of novel transactions related to property,
plant and equipment.
•implementing additional levels of management review and oversight, including consultation with external technical
accounting resources as necessary, over significant accounting conclusions related to property, plant and equipment,
including those involving the application of accounting guidance to novel or non-routine transactions.
We believe our remediation plan will be sufficient to remediate the material weakness. However, the material weakness will not
be considered remediated until management completes the design and implementation of the actions described above and the controls
operate for a sufficient period of time, and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are effective. As we test our
internal controls over financial reporting, we may determine that additional measures or modifications to the remediation plan are
necessary or appropriate.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the most recently completed fiscal quarter, there was no change in Core Scientific, Inc.’s internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
113
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
Core Scientific, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Core Scientific, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness, described below, on the
achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2025, the related consolidated statements of operations,
changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial
statements), and our report dated March 2, 2026 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a
reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or
detected on a timely basis. A material weakness related to controls over the accounting for assets intended for demolition has been
identified and included in management’s assessment. The material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and
extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2025 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report on
those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Controls
over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the
Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control
based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect
on the financial statements.
114
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 2, 2026
Item 9B. Other Information
Trading Arrangements
During the three months ended December 31, 2025, the following directors or officers of the Company adopted or terminated
“Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-
K:
Name & Title | Date of Adoption/ Termination | Character of Trading Arrangement1 | Aggregate Number of Shares of Common Stock to be Purchased/Sold pursuant to Trading Arrangement | Duration of Plan2 |
Rule 10b5-1 | April 1, 2026 - | |||
Chief Legal and Administrative Officer, and Secretary | Trading Arrangement | |||
Rule 10b5-1 | December 26, 2025 - | |||
Trading Arrangement | ||||
Rule 10b5-1 | January 9, 2026 - | |||
Trading Arrangement |
1 Each trading arrangement marked as a “Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangement” is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule
10b5-1(c), as amended (the “Rule”).
2 Each trading arrangement marked as a “Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangement” only permits transactions after the indicated duration start date and, in
any case, upon expiration of the applicable mandatory cooling-off period under the Rule, and until the earlier of the indicated duration end date or
completion of all sales contemplated in the Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangement.
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
Not applicable.
115
Part III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement for our 2026 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after December 31, 2025 pursuant to Regulation
14A (the “2026 Proxy Statement”). For the relevant information within the 2026 Proxy Statement, see the information included under
the principal headings “Information Regarding Director Nominees and Directors”; “Executive Officers”; “Section 16(a) Beneficial
Ownership Reporting Compliance”; and the sub-headings “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics”; “Audit Committee”; and “Insider
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the 2026 Proxy Statement under the principal headings
“Compensation Discussion and Analysis”; “Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors”; “Executive
Compensation”; “Non-Employee Director Compensation”; “Pay versus Performance”; and the sub-heading “Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” under the principal heading “Corporate Governance and Related Matters.”
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the 2026 Proxy Statement under the principal headings
“Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans”; “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management”; and, with respect to the narrative description of the 2025 Stock Incentive Plan, the sub-heading “Narrative Disclosure
to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” under the principal heading “Compensation Discussion
and Analysis.”
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the 2026 Proxy Statement under the principal heading
“Transactions with Related Persons” and the sub-heading “Board of Directors Independence” and, with respect to determining
whether the members of a committee of the Board of Directors are independent, the sub-headings “Audit Committee”; “Compensation
Committee”; and “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee” under the principal heading “Corporate Governance and
Related Matters.”
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the 2026 Proxy Statement under the sub-headings
“Principal Accountant Fees and Services” and “Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures” within the principal heading “Proposal 3 —
Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”
116
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
1. Consolidated Financial Statements
The following consolidated financial statements of Core Scientific, Inc. are filed as part of this report.
Contents | Page |
2. Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules
All schedules are omitted as the information required is inapplicable or the information is presented in the consolidated
financial statements or the related notes.
117
3. Exhibits
Exhibit Description | ||
2.1†† | ||
2.2†† | ||
2.3†† | ||
2.4 | ||
3.1 | ||
3.2 | ||
4.1 | ||
4.2†† | ||
4.3†† | ||
4.4 | ||
4.5 | ||
4.6 | ||
10.1# |
118
Exhibit Description | ||
10.2# | ||
10.3# | ||
10.4# | ||
10.5# | ||
10.6# | ||
10.7# | ||
10.8# | ||
10.9++ | ||
10.10†† | ||
10.11++ | ||
10.12++ | ||
10.13††++ | ||
10.14††++ | ||
10.15††++ |
119
Exhibit Description | ||
10.16 | ||
10.17 | ||
10.18 | ||
10.19# | ||
10.20# | ||
10.21# | ||
10.22# | ||
10.23# | ||
10.24# | ||
10.25# | ||
10.26# | ||
10.27# | ||
10.28# | ||
16.1 | ||
19 | ||
21.1* |
120
Exhibit Description | ||
23.1* | ||
23.2* | ||
31.1* | ||
31.2* | ||
32.1* | ||
32.2* | ||
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document. | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase. | |
104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (the cover page XBRL tags) |
___________
* | Filed or furnished herewith. |
# | Indicates management contract or compensatory plan. |
†† | Certain of the exhibits and schedules to these exhibits have been omitted in accordance with Regulation S-K Item 601(a)(5). The registrant agrees to furnish a copy of all omitted exhibits and schedules to the SEC upon its request. |
++ | Portions of this Exhibit (indicated by asterisks) have been omitted as the Registrant has determined that the omitted information is (i) not material and (ii) the type of information that the registrant customarily and actually treats as private or confidential. |
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
Not applicable.
121
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Core Scientific, Inc. | |||
By: | /s/ Adam Sullivan | ||
Name: | Adam Sullivan | ||
Title: | Chief Executive Officer | ||
Date: | March 2, 2026 | ||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf
of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature | Position | Date | ||
/s/ Adam Sullivan | Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) | March 2, 2026 | ||
Adam Sullivan | ||||
/s/ Jim Nygaard | Chief Financial Officer (Duly Authorized Officer & Principal Financial Officer) | March 2, 2026 | ||
Jim Nygaard | ||||
/s/ Elizabeth Crain | Director | March 2, 2026 | ||
Elizabeth Crain | ||||
/s/ Jeff Booth | Director | March 2, 2026 | ||
Jeff Booth | ||||
/s/ Jordan Levy | Director | March 2, 2026 | ||
Jordan Levy | ||||
/s/ Yadin Rozov | Director | March 2, 2026 | ||
Yadin Rozov | ||||
/s/ Eric Weiss | Director | March 2, 2026 | ||
Eric Weiss | ||||